On 22 July 2011 02:06, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org wrote:
On 07/21/2011 09:43 AM, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
On 21/07/2011 14:23, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I am of the opinion that good inter-operability with MSO products makes
it easier to attract new users and that
On 22/07/2011 02:06, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 07/21/2011 09:43 AM, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
On 21/07/2011 14:23, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I am of the opinion that good inter-operability with MSO products
makes it easier to attract new users and that poor inter-operability
While that is certainly advisable, I think we need some good CYA. Some
people in this sad sad world just like to sue.
Marc-André Laverdière
Software Security Scientist
Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services
Hyderabad, India
On 07/21/2011 11:57 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I think the DMCA
Le 2011-07-21 04:32, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
Hello,
I'd like to quote my colleague Thorsten Behrens on this:
==
With the upcoming extension website,
we'll need some kind of click-through license agreement, for someone
submitting software, and a disclaimer on the front page, refusing
On 21/07/2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org wrote:
On 07/21/2011 08:47 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 21/07/2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyakand...@pitonyak.org wrote
I am more comfortable in OOo than I am in MSO, so, I have created many
MSO deliverables in OOo and LO. The only time that I
On 21/07/2011, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Yes, don't confuse ODF compatibility with OpenOffice.org (or LibreOffice)
compatibility. I was in the room on one occasion when Microsoft was asking
for advice on their approach to ODF 1.1 Spreadsheet documents.
Unfortunately,
On 22/07/2011 15:24, e-letter wrote:
Fine. People are/should be free to choose whichever program they
prefer. If someone likes the interface of m$o, good for them. The
point of the original post, is that priority should be for LO
performance in native odf to be better than m$o performance in
At 02:33 21-7-2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 07/20/2011 05:02 PM, e-letter wrote:
On the users mailing list, a significant proportion of a random view
of questions seems to be with relation to using LO is some way with m$
document formats.
(...)
I might also conclude that there is
I don't find it credible that Microsoft would intentionally deviate in ways to
break a format, considering the level of scrutiny they receive from
regulatory authorities and everyone else.
I find it more creditable that they didn't do a terrific job in their first
effort and it might not have
On 07/22/2011 10:24 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 21/07/2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyakand...@pitonyak.org wrote:
On 07/21/2011 08:47 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 21/07/2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyakand...@pitonyak.org wrote
I am more comfortable in OOo than I am in MSO, so, I have created many
MSO
10 matches
Mail list logo
