The major problem with that as far as I can see is that there is NO
RECORD ANYWHERE of the emails sent by that process.
Surely in the days of Sarbanes-Oxley and other legislation that is an
appalling omission?
If you represent a major company for which stuff like this is important, and
your
Karl Behler karl.behler at ipp.mpg.de writes:
What I know from other platforms (Solaris/Linux) is that autosave saves
into a hidden file in the background not destroying your last saved
document.
You are confusing autosave as implemented in random applications (including OOo
and LO) for a
Send me a link to a build and a test scenario
That would be fairly pointless, as I don't have interest currently in working on
it any more anyway. I can send the patch to anybody interested, though.
--tml
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems?
E.g. I know it doesn't really matter to the devs that a user can no longer
load a docx document which contains an OLE object because docx is from the
evil MS.
You do?
You are barking up the wrong tree here. I have not seen any actual developers
use language like evil MS or M$ and
Wouldnt that require us to migrate from the current 10.4 sdk which
everything is built against to the latest 10.7 in regards to API's?
Not necessarily. This is not a technical list, so this will probably make the
eyes glaze over for most readers, but still:
As long as only calling new
Do you think these features could be tested in a development build ???
Read my first reply in this thread. The little experimentation I did is
certainly not good enough to be committed.
--tml
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems?
Larry Gusaas larry.gusaas at gmail.com writes:
When will LibreOffice add support for using the Versions,
Full-Screen mode, and Resume features in Mac OS X version 10.7 Lion ?
When somebody writes the code. (And offers it for inclusion under the
license(s) we use.)
NeoOffice already
So here is my suggestion: I propose the everyone here head over to the
Apache Incubator and join the proposal as an initial member.
Well, at least for me the problem is:
I *work* on LibreOffice. I f I wasn't paid to do it, I doubt I would touch it.
Or maybe I would, hard to know. As far as
But can't it simply say RC2 somewhere so that *USERS* KNOW which version
they have?
Think harder. The point is that if a Release Candidate build is determined to be
good *enough* to be released, the *exact* *same* *bits* will become the release
then instead. Just the names of the download
(Note that I am not subscribed to the discuss list, and I don't intend to
subscribe, so please Cc: me in replies explicitly.)
1. The file named as msvc90.dll appears wrong. I believe that it
should be msvcm90.dll, with that second m in the file name.
Or msvcr90.dll. But both msvcr90.dll and
I have collected some features enteprises will love to have implemented
in LibreOffice and listed them in
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Crazy_Ideas#Features_Enterprises_Will_Love_To_Have_Implemented
Great, but why is this on the Crazy Ideas page? Those are far from crazy
11 matches
Mail list logo
