Hi Marco, *,
M. Fioretti schrieb:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 15:16:35 PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier
(lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com) wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:05 AM, NoOp wrote:
>>> 1. Why are unsubscribed posts even allowed? It would seem that
>>> folks would have learned from the OOo l
Hi all,
M. Fioretti wrote (09-03-11 19:45)
please note that I explicitly acknowledge in that page that "it is
unavoidable that such a support list must accept (after moderation)
even messages from unsubscribed users". So (in this case) I agree with
you that non-subscribers messages must pass.
(sorry if this is a duplicate, my mail server had problems earlier
today)
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 15:16:35 PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier
(lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:05 AM, NoOp wrote:
>
> > 1. Why are unsubscribed posts even allowed? It would seem that
> > f
Do you see any need for that? There does not seem to be much spam coming in.
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-03-09 15.30:
I guess if you would like i can work on beefing up the spam filtering
--
Florian Effenberger
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 834
On 3/9/11 3:27 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-03-09 15.25:
Have you tried using spamassassin with baysian filtering. the way I have
things setup on my mail server is that emails are checked and given a
score default being 5. anything 5 or higher is automatica
Hi,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-03-09 15.25:
Have you tried using spamassassin with baysian filtering. the way I have
things setup on my mail server is that emails are checked and given a
score default being 5. anything 5 or higher is automatically filtered as
spam. my friends server setup i
On 3/9/11 3:23 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-03-09 14.53:
Can mailman integrate with spamassassin? if it can why not route the
lists through a spamassassin? My reasoning for this is that we will
eliminate list moderation and free up moderators for other thin
Hi James, *,
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:50 AM, James Wilde wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2011, at 04:05 , NoOp wrote:
> [...] We have no way of making public that a message has been moderated,
That's just wrong, as the sure hint for that is that it is actually
sent to the list subscribers.
So when you receiv
Hi,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-03-09 14.53:
Can mailman integrate with spamassassin? if it can why not route the
lists through a spamassassin? My reasoning for this is that we will
eliminate list moderation and free up moderators for other things.
we do Greylisting, in-SMTP-policy checkin
Hi *,
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:05 AM, NoOp wrote:
> [...]
> I'm not versed on mailman, so I don't know the answer. However, the
> current issue of mail list subscribers not being able to
> subscribe/unsubscribe/modify user settings/etc in mlmmj as they can in
> mailman is an issue. And it will li
On 3/9/11 9:04 AM, James Wilde wrote:
On Mar 9, 2011, at 08:50 , James Wilde wrote:
On Mar 9, 2011, at 04:05 , NoOp wrote:
Of late there are multiple posts on the users list regarding mail list
subscribe and unsubscribe issues.
Florian points out an issue with mailman:
http://permalink.
On 3/9/11 11:07 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
Mailman has not been chosen mainly out of two reasons:
1. Moderation via e-mail is not comfortable. It especially requires
one password shared among all moderators, which is inconvenient.
2. Although virtual domains are supported, the lis
Hello,
Mailman has not been chosen mainly out of two reasons:
1. Moderation via e-mail is not comfortable. It especially requires one
password shared among all moderators, which is inconvenient.
2. Although virtual domains are supported, the list name can only exist
once per Mailman installa
On Mar 9, 2011, at 08:50 , James Wilde wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2011, at 04:05 , NoOp wrote:
>
>> Of late there are multiple posts on the users list regarding mail list
>> subscribe and unsubscribe issues.
>>
>>
>
>
>> Florian points out an issue with mailman:
>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gman
On Mar 9, 2011, at 04:05 , NoOp wrote:
> Of late there are multiple posts on the users list regarding mail list
> subscribe and unsubscribe issues.
>
>
> Florian points out an issue with mailman:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/226
>
> We use mlmmj for good
Of late there are multiple posts on the users list regarding mail list
subscribe and unsubscribe issues.
A post back in October "[tdf-discuss] Mailing list user preferences?":
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/100
[Note: I tried to find the thread in:
http://listarchi
16 matches
Mail list logo