I understand you're probably frustrated with not being able to use
libreoffice yet; however, I think you're demanding tone is a bit harsh on
the *volunteer* developer's of libreoffice. I myself have been *very*
frustrated sometimes; however, I have to remind myself that *voluntary*
developers are
Thanks Stuart, appreciate the thought.
Tomorrow will be a better day. :)
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:25 PM, V Stuart Foote
wrote:
> RichardH wrote
> > Either fill out a bug report,
> > move this to the developer's list
> > or close this thread.
>
> Sorry, but it does NOT
RichardH wrote
> Either fill out a bug report,
> move this to the developer's list
> or close this thread.
Sorry, but it does NOT belong on the dev list. And all needed bugs are
filed...
OP was informed of such some time ago on the User ML:
> ... Oracle must fix the JRE, or Apple must
g>
> To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
> Sent: 3/15/2016 9:32:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1
>
> On 3/14/2016 9:51 PM, Larry Gusaas <larry.gus...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> My "Fix it" comment was aimed
t; <tansta...@libertytrek.org>
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: 3/15/2016 9:32:14 AM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1
On 3/14/2016 9:51 PM, Larry Gusaas <larry.gus...@gmail.com> wrote:
My "Fix it" comment was aimed at LibreOffice in general, no
On 3/14/2016 9:51 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> My "Fix it" comment was aimed at LibreOffice in general, not to you
> specifically.
Oh, so you prefer to issue 'general purpose' commands and edicts rather
than ones aimed at spoecific people. How very thoughtful.
> You are
On 2016-03-14, 4:48 PM Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 11/03/2016 18:51, Larry Gusaas a écrit :
Dear Mr. Gussas,
That is not a fix but a workaround. Fix it.
No doubt if I had the skills to do so, I might, but I'm afraid my poor
brain can only cope with installing a JDK and occasionally
Le 11/03/2016 18:51, Larry Gusaas a écrit :
Dear Mr. Gussas,
> That is not a fix but a workaround. Fix it.
>
No doubt if I had the skills to do so, I might, but I'm afraid my poor
brain can only cope with installing a JDK and occasionally offering some
of my time to try and answer the
On 2016-03-12, 9:28 AM Tanstaafl wrote:
And every time a new bug crops up in OSX, it is on every other software
developer to work around their bugs?
You just don't get it. It's not a new bug. LibreOffice's database was working fine on Macs
until the update to LibreOffice 5.1 made it unusable.
On 3/11/2016 6:22 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> On 2016-03-11, 4:11 PM Tanstaafl wrote:
>> On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
>>> No. It is a LibreOffice bug. You broke the usability of LibreOffice
>>> on Macs with your code change.
>> *I*
Ah . the typical mac user like I know them.
The most important reason I well never get a mac: I don't want to become
such a person...
Am 12.03.2016 um 2.17 schrieb Larry Gusaas:
In other word you don't give a fuck about Mac users.
I am now going to recommend, on all forums and users lists I
On 03/11/2016 11:51 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
>
>
> On 2016-03-11, 4:18 AM Alexander Thurgood wrote:
>> Le 11/03/2016 01:47, Larry Gusaas a écrit :
>>> LibreOffice 5.1.1 on Macs still doesn't recognize Java Runtime
>>> Environment (JRE 1.8.0_73 & OS X ver.10.11.3)
>>>
>>> You need to fix this bug.
I have solutions for my needs.
I posted so you can provide a workable product for other Mac users. LibreOffice database used
to work. Now the developers have broken it. And it seems no one cares.
Jeez. That is the thanks I get for pointing out problems with LibreOffice.
By the way, why do
In other word you don't give a fuck about Mac users.
I am now going to recommend, on all forums and users lists I provide support on, that Mac users
not use LibreOffice.
Just goes to show what a bunch of a-holes LibreOffice developers are.
On 2016-03-11, 6:33 PM Joel Madero wrote:
All I
In shortno.
On 03/11/2016 03:49 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> On 2016-03-11, 5:32 PM Joel Madero wrote:
>> Please take this off discuss@ list, it belongs at best on dev list, QA
>> list, or user listdiscuss list isn't the appropriate place.
> Why???
> I am not a developer and don't follow
On 2016-03-11, 5:32 PM Joel Madero wrote:
Please take this off discuss@ list, it belongs at best on dev list, QA
list, or user listdiscuss list isn't the appropriate place.
Why???
I am not a developer and don't follow that list.
I am not asking for help.
I am reporting a problem with the
Please take this off discuss@ list, it belongs at best on dev list, QA
list, or user listdiscuss list isn't the appropriate place.
You can also report a bug (no clue if you did), it will get closed as
NOTOURBUG if it's not our bug.
Thanks.
Best,
Joel
On 03/11/2016 03:22 PM, Larry Gusaas
On 2016-03-11, 4:11 PM Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
No. It is a LibreOffice bug. You broke the usability of LibreOffice
on Macs with your code change.
*I* broke it?
Seems that from Mac users point of view,
there was no bug until LibO fixed their bug
and exposed the Mac bug.
Wonder who the Mac users will blame?
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Tanstaafl
wrote:
> On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 3/11/2016 4:19 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> No. It is a LibreOffice bug. You broke the usability of LibreOffice
> on Macs with your code change.
*I* broke it? Sorry Larry I'm just a user like you.
> It
On 2016-03-11, 2:39 PM Tanstaafl wrote:
So, you are complaining about a Mac bug here... please take it to the
appropriate place (wherever you report Mac bugs)...
No. It is a LibreOffice bug. You broke the usability of LibreOffice on Macs with your code
change. It worked before.
Any new
Why is this thread in the tdf-discuss list?
On 3/11/2016 3:28 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> Proof??? JRE works with 5.0 and doesn't work with 5.1. That is pretty
> objective proof.
> LibreOffice code changed and now does not find JRE on OS X.
>
> In case you weren't
On 2016-03-11, 1:30 PM Joel Madero wrote:
Why? Change in LibreOffice code broke it. Nothing to do with Apple.
Proof? Maybe we fixed something that just triggered a bug already in
Javado you have some objective proof that this is our bug?
Proof??? JRE works with 5.0 and doesn't work
>
>
> Why? Change in LibreOffice code broke it. Nothing to do with Apple.
>
Proof? Maybe we fixed something that just triggered a bug already in
Javado you have some objective proof that this is our bug?
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems?
On 2016-03-11, 12:47 PM Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/11/2016 12:51 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2016-03-11, 4:18 AM Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 11/03/2016 01:47, Larry Gusaas a écrit :
LibreOffice 5.1.1 on Macs still doesn't recognize Java Runtime
Environment (JRE 1.8.0_73 &
On 3/11/2016 12:51 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> On 2016-03-11, 4:18 AM Alexander Thurgood wrote:
>> Le 11/03/2016 01:47, Larry Gusaas a écrit :
>>> LibreOffice 5.1.1 on Macs still doesn't recognize Java Runtime
>>> Environment (JRE 1.8.0_73 & OS X ver.10.11.3)
>>>
>>> You
On 2016-03-11, 4:18 AM Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 11/03/2016 01:47, Larry Gusaas a écrit :
LibreOffice 5.1.1 on Macs still doesn't recognize Java Runtime
Environment (JRE 1.8.0_73 & OS X ver.10.11.3)
You need to fix this bug. Can't use database without JRE.
Cf. bug 96163
Hi
Am 11.03.16 um 10:18 schrieb Alexander Thurgood:
> Install the JDK instead, it really isn't that hard. A PITA yes, but not
> hard.
Wow - that helps! Find it here:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk8-downloads-2133151.html
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Uwe Altmann
--
Le 11/03/2016 01:47, Larry Gusaas a écrit :
> LibreOffice 5.1.1 on Macs still doesn't recognize Java Runtime
> Environment (JRE 1.8.0_73 & OS X ver.10.11.3)
>
> You need to fix this bug. Can't use database without JRE.
>
Cf. bug 96163
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96163
29 matches
Mail list logo