RE : Re: [steering-discuss] Version numbering of LibO

2010-11-03 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hi, Top posting from my phone... This is not an easy answer to give. Both strategies have pros and cons. My advice would be to start where we are but alter the numbering scheme wildly: 3.3, 3.5 and then 4.0 instead of 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 like OOo. Charles. Le 3 nov. 2010, 12:03 PM, Michael Meeks

Re: RE : Re: [steering-discuss] Version numbering of LibO

2010-11-03 Thread Stefan Weigel
Hi, Am 03.11.2010 14:54, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz: Hi, Top posting from my phone... This is not an easy answer to give. Both strategies have pros and cons. My advice would be to start where we are but alter the numbering scheme wildly: 3.3, 3.5 and then 4.0 instead of 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 like

Re: RE : Re: [steering-discuss] Version numbering of LibO

2010-11-03 Thread Jesús Corrius
Hi all, On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Stefan Weigel stefan.wei...@bildungskreis.org wrote: Hi, Am 03.11.2010 14:54, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz: Hi, Top posting from my phone... This is not an easy answer to give. Both strategies have pros and cons. My advice would be to start where we are