Hi all,
Am 28.05.2011 01:58, schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier:
Hi all,
installing LibO 3.4.0RC2 I noticed there is no tag describing the
release version.
So LibO 3.3.2 shows up:
LibreOffice 3.3.2
OOO330m19 (Build:202)
tag libreoffice-3.3.2.2
LibO 3.4.0RC2 shows:
LibreOffice 3.4.0
OOO340m1
2011/5/28 Friedrich Strohmaier damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de:
Hi all,
installing LibO 3.4.0RC2 I noticed there is no tag describing the
release version.
So LibO 3.3.2 shows up:
LibreOffice 3.3.2
OOO330m19 (Build:202)
tag libreoffice-3.3.2.2
LibO 3.4.0RC2 shows:
LibreOffice 3.4.0
@Andras
Yes. That is quite obvious for developers.
But can't it simply say RC2 somewhere so that *USERS* KNOW which version
they have?
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RC2-no-3-4-0-x-tag-in-help-about-libreoffice-tp2994857p2995756.html
Sent from the Discuss
A hyperlink to gnuplot was provided
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.gnuplot.user/5655) but
as originally stated, how this would help is not understood.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more:
Usually I have a look at the package and i keep it away :-)
plino a écrit :
@Andras
Yes. That is quite obvious for developers.
But can't it simply say RC2 somewhere so that *USERS* KNOW which version
they have?
--
View this message in context:
Hi Hans-Peter,
On 28/05/2011 03:21, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
On Thursday 26 May 2011, 12:28:07 Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know, how it is archived to setup the LO equivalent
to the method described here:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/ProUN
Original Message
From: Marius Popa marius.mar...@gmail.com
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 08:36:32 +0300
Probably, I should first convert the PDF to ODT and then remake the
file and convert it to PDF again. How to convert a PDF to an ODT
file?
I've been wondering for some time why downloading a stable Swedish version
of LO is more complicated than downloading a stable Swedish version of OO (I
presume this is also the case for other non-English languages, but I've not
tried). Below a table which displays the difference :
*(64-bit)
Hi,
Am 28.05.2011 19:44, schrieb M Henri Day:
If the respective helppacks and langpacks
can be included in stable versions of OO for non-English languages, I fail
to understand why the same thing cannot be done for LO versions. But perhaps
I am missing something here ?...
As far as I know,
2011/5/28 Stefan Weigel stefan.wei...@bildungskreis.org
Hi,
Am 28.05.2011 19:44, schrieb M Henri Day:
If the respective helppacks and langpacks
can be included in stable versions of OO for non-English languages, I
fail
to understand why the same thing cannot be done for LO versions.
Hi Henri, *,
M Henri Day schrieb:
2011/5/28 Stefan Weigel stefan.wei...@bildungskreis.org
Am 28.05.2011 19:44, schrieb M Henri Day:
If the respective helppacks and langpacks can be included in stable
versions of OO for non-English languages, I fail to understand why
the same thing cannot be
M Henri Day wrote:
2011/5/28 Stefan Weigel stefan.weigel@...
As far as I know, it´s an issue of data volume on the download servers.
Which, no doubt, is an question of money.
Actually it is just a choice: it does lower the barrier for someone to
host a mirror, but the size and upload time are
Hi NoOp, *
NoOp schrieb:
[...] that page is on
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Local_Mailing_Lists/ so even if
translated and cleaned up wouldn't suffice.
The place for such a FAQ should be on
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/ and apply to all
locales. Suggestions:
Hello,
I received various inquiries of having fixed times for the SC calls, to
avoid confusion and help better planning. I do not want to decided that
on my own, so I would like to ask for feedback, especially from the SC
members, as they have to participate. :)
What I could imagine is
14 matches
Mail list logo
