[steering-discuss] additional German confcall numbers

2011-05-06 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hello,

some participants from Germany had problems with dialing in to the 
steering committee calls as well as the marketing conference calls. Our 
phone conference provider informed us about additional numbers that are 
currenty not listed on the public page. If you have issues dialing in, 
try one of these.


For landline users, there's now also

+49 89 66 6 66 08 93
+49 40 95 06 99 70

In addition, for users of German mobile networks, there's one number in 
the vistream network available. In case your provider locks 
participation in the conference, try this number:


+49 15 70 - 333 6000

In all cases, to be sure about coverage with flatrates, please ask your 
provider directly.


Thanks to talkyoo for their generous sponsorship, and their providing of 
additional numbers!


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice Math: There is no

2011-05-06 Thread Christian Lohmaier
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:26 PM, M Henri Day mhenri...@gmail.com wrote:

 Bernhard, you must have missed my most recent reply to Christian above. My
 error was *not* in attempting to «reconvert» a hexadecimal representation to
 yet another hexadecimal,

Yes, you did...

 but rather in simply mistaking a decimal
 representation (2204, which represents the same number as the hexdecimal

No - your mistake is to mistake 2204 as decimal.

 089c), found as I explicitly noted, on p 1 of the Unicode table, as being
 that of the Unicode glyph (∄) in question, whereas it codes for an entirely
 different glyph.

But 2204 /is/ the (hex)representation of ∄

∄ = 2204₁₆ (hex) = 8708₁₀ (decimal)

but well, I guess that's clear now, I don't really know why I did
reply... Sorry for the noise.

ciao
Christian

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted