On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:26 PM, M Henri Day <[email protected]> wrote: > > Bernhard, you must have missed my most recent reply to Christian above. My > error was *not* in attempting to «reconvert» a hexadecimal representation to > yet another hexadecimal,
Yes, you did... > but rather in simply mistaking a decimal > representation (2204, which represents the same number as the hexdecimal No - your mistake is to mistake 2204 as decimal. > 089c), found as I explicitly noted, on p 1 of the Unicode table, as being > that of the Unicode glyph (∄) in question, whereas it codes for an entirely > different glyph. But 2204 /is/ the (hex)representation of ∄ ∄ = 2204₁₆ (hex) = 8708₁₀ (decimal) but well, I guess that's clear now, I don't really know why I did reply... Sorry for the noise. ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
