RE: [tdf-discuss] Help vendor-lock-in awareness

2013-02-15 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Dennis,

Not wanting to feed a big fat troll(the OOXML topic) I srill would like to 
point out that un terms of IPR ODF has a very clean and simple RF basis 
(royalty free) while OOXML is much more unclear on that point although it 
appeaes you don't have to pay fees for implementing what's covered in the ISO 
standard.

Best,

Charles
(who's a former director of the OASIS consortium)


Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org a écrit :

To be clear, the OOXML File Format is the subject of an International
Standard, the same way that ODF is an International Standard.  (OOXML
started off in ECMA, ODF started off in OASIS.  Both are ISO
Standards.)

So the specifications are open and freely available.  You can download
them
for free.

In addition, Microsoft has provided its Open Specification Promise and
other
declarations so that implementations of consumers and producers of the
format are not subject to any patent claims from Microsoft and it is
not
necessary to obtain a license.  Sun did something similar for ODF.

The Microsoft Office *implementation* is not open source.  Likewise,
the
built-in support of ODF in Microsoft Office is not open source.  The
standards for the formats are open.  Open-source implementations are
not
required.

Support for OOXML in products like LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice,
and in
the Apache POI Project, to name three, is open source -- they are open
source projects and the source code is available under open source
licenses.
Just as support for ODF in LibO, AOO, and the ODF Toolkit is with
open-source code.

-Original Message-
From: lj [mailto:ljelou...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 00:08
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Fwd: [tdf-discuss] Help vendor-lock-in awareness

-- Forwarded message --
From: lj ljelou...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Help vendor-lock-in awareness
To: dennis.hamil...@acm.org dennis.hamil...@acm.org


Thank you for the explanation of OOXML.
But I am still confused.
To Clear Things Up I need to know if the OOXML File Format, is open
sourced... or proprietary?
(This was probably mentioned before...)
Then I would definitely have a clearer understanding.
Thanks,
LJ


On 08/02/2013, at 5:49 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:

 Yes there is an International Standard for OOXML.  I *suspect* that
the
 provision of two-different Save As ... cases is (1) for the
Transitional
 Standard OOXML which is the closest to what is acceptable by all
Microsoft
 Office applications that accept .docx, .xlsx, and .pptx, and (2) for
Strict
 Standard OOXML that is accepted only by Office 2010 and 2013 and can
be
 produced by 2013.  I have no idea how close the alignment of
LibreOffice
is
 to those two flavors of Standard OOXML, which is a different
question.
 There are those who think that Transitional is somehow not truly
OOXML,
but
 both are specified in the International Standard.  Microsoft Office
also
 takes advantage of the extension mechanism, MCE, that is provided in
the
 International Standard.  I don't know how that sorts out in the
 interoperability between LibreOffice and Microsoft Office using
OOXML.

 The Wikipedia article is not bad.  However, there has been
significant
 maintenance of IS 29500:2008 and that has impacted the original
separation
 of Transitional and Strict by making them syntactically separate
while
 having considerable overlap in terms of function and semantics.  The
current
 edition of the International Standard for OOXML is IS 29500:2012. 
There
is
 also an in-process amendment.

 - Dennis

 -Original Message-
 From: lj [mailto:ljelou...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 15:38
 To: Simon Phipps
 Cc: Jonathan Aquilina; Boudi van Vlijmen;
discuss@documentfoundation.org
 Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Help vendor-lock-in awareness

 Isn't there a standard Office Open XML Document Format?
 What is the difference between office open xml and standard microsoft
docx
 formats in LibreOffice and why does LibreOffice include both?
 is there also a link where I can read about this... the only think I
have
 found useful is what open xml is.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_Open_XML






 On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
wrote:

 I don't know anyone who uses Office so I'm afraid I can't answer.
That's
 why I send PDFs - everyone can open those and see the same document.

 On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Jonathan Aquilina
eagles051...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 My question though Simon is how well is ODF formatting preserved
when
 opening up ODF formats in office 2010 and above on windows.

 -Original Message-
 From: Simon Phipps [mailto:si...@webmink.com]
 Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 4:11 PM
 To: Boudi van Vlijmen
 Cc: discuss@documentfoundation.org
 Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Help vendor-lock-in awareness

 I generally advise people to send me PDFs rather than editable
documents
 

[tdf-discuss] Article about LibreOffice, brands, etc

2013-02-15 Thread Keith Curtis
Hi;

I wrote an article in support of LibreOffice, submitted it to lxer.com, and
it was their top story of the day: http://keithcu.com/wordpress/?p=3163

Some of what I wrote might be impolitic about a sensitive issue. I'm not
trying to troll this old topic, I just write about important things I care
about and hope it is food for thought.

You guys are doing great for just 2.5 years!

Warm regards,

-Keith

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted