I agree with your premises. Having been a CAD operator who, at times,
had to send drawing files to others, I felt it was MY responsibility to
find out what the other person could read, or at least provide him/her
with a way to contact me if there were problems opening the file. This
carried over
On 01/02/2011 09:08 AM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
--- SNIP ---
Is that what you think it would be to implement the OOXML Strict
formats? I sure don't see it that way -- we would simply be supporting
an ISO standard, however it was arrived at. The fact that we could
possibly do it before MS
I remember my days of working for an outfit that used Outlook and MS
products. I looked into Outlook for myself. I was not amused.
Years later I turned to Linux, and the particular distribution I chose
installed Evolution by default. I looked into it. I was not amused.
So I tried uninstalling
...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/01/11 19:20, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
So, what am I saying? You don't NEED to add something useless like
Outlook or Evolution to LO. You just have to allow Thunderbird to
connect to it, and people can make their own choice as to whether they
want all the other bells
Barbara,
First, ODF IS the ISO standard - honestly made so without the dirty
tricks that MS used to stuff the committee and force it to approve
something that wasn't ready to be used by anyone.
Second, MS refuses to support any ODF except the one that is actually an
ISO standard. That makes
There are many times in which HTML doesn't translate correctly to a
recipient. The lowest common denominator, then, is plain text. That
being the case I habitually set my email reader to send in plain text.
Also, for one who uses gpg (or it's equivalent), even occasionally, the
encrypting
Happy New Year from The Valley of the Sun in Arizona. Although it
tried to be The Valley of the Snow with this last storm.
Despite strange weather patterns, here's wishing all of you a BETTER new
year.
Craig A. Eddy
Tyche
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h
And thank you very much. I hadn't noticed that link (it's VERY obscure)
until you mentioned that it was there and the approximate location.
Craig
Tyche
On 12/06/2010 03:10 AM, Sigrid Carrera wrote:
Hello Rainer,
2010/12/6 Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com:
Hi
I am using ubuntu, but on the
Rictec,
Modicum - a small amount
Standard Information - In the way that Robert Holtzman used the term, he
means certain facts about your computer and operating system, and the
software you're running at the time (for example, Linux operating
system, LibreOffice 3.3 Beta, Writer. These are only
On 11/25/2010 07:27 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
Hi Robert:
Yes this would be ideal. However, this would also impact our developers
and add to their work. I, myself, would favour Barbara's suggestion of
having a link offering the user the to download extra packages such as
manuals. BTW ... I
On 11/23/2010 02:50 PM, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 23 November 2010 21:25, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
On Tue Nov 23 2010 12:36:35 GMT-0800 (PST) Robert Derman wrote:
Assuming that it is, I think the primary users manual should focus on
Writer, with just one chapter on each of
On 11/22/2010 05:33 AM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 08:04:29AM -0700, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
listed in the README_en-US file. I'm not familiar with dpgk, though I
Then get. You administer a Debian-based system without knowing dpkg? Oh my.
(Besides that, http
for an Ubuntu system. I'll
draft a how-to over the next few days, file a bug and suggest it for
inclusion in the Linux downloads.
HTH.
David Nelson
Mr. Nelson,
Thank you, on behalf of myself and all the unknown nameless people who
will benefit in the future.
Craig A. Eddy
Tyche
On 11/22/2010 06:37 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/22/2010 06:43 AM, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
...
René
It isn't so much that I administer a Debian release as that I USE a
Debian release and do what I can. What I do is what I have managed to
learn to do over time, but without any formal training
Recently (like 4:00 AM local time, November 20, 2010) I downloaded the
.tar.gz of the .deb files from TDF
(http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/3.3.0-beta3/deb/).
On unpacking the archived files I discovered that LO is subjecting poor
unsuspecting users to the same problem
On 11/20/2010 08:04 AM, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
On 11/20/2010 07:59 AM, Stefan Weigel wrote:
Hi,
Am 20.11.2010 15:51, schrieb Craig A. Eddy:
there is no obvious way to start to install the files. Dependencies for
each .deb have to be met, but nothing indicates the order with which
On 11/20/2010 03:24 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
Hi Craig, *,
Craig A. Eddy schrieb:
On 11/20/2010 07:59 AM, Stefan Weigel wrote:
Am 20.11.2010 15:51, schrieb Craig A. Eddy:
there is no obvious way to start to install the files.
Dependencies for each .deb have to be met
Potential problem:
When searching for a word, if the various choices are not correct to
find that particular word (for instance, if you have a word highlighted
and it just searches that word), then changing the choices does not
result in changing the behavior of the plug-in (for instance,
Robert, I'm sorry, but I must
disagree with you.I'm not a developer, I'm a user.I will admit that
I started with Microsoft Word (More years ago than I'm comfortable
admitting), but switched to OO.o as soon as it came out.It's only
just recently that I've begun to understand how to use (and create)
19 matches
Mail list logo
