On 24/01/11 13:14, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
Obviously if I have a stable version installed, I don't expect to be
notified for RCs, but if I have an RC version installed I would expect to be
notified for any new versions.
Something akin to Mozilla's release, beta and nightly update channels
should
have an issue with
implementing by graduations (in line with Microsoft) strict OOXML via a
series of transitional specifications?
Kind Regards,
Lee Hyde.
--
In order to offer someone a financial reward without him working for
it, the government must first ensure that somebody else works
behaviour.
Such would be a public relations nightmare for Microsoft would it not,
and against its own best interests.
Also, are there any previous cases where a proprietary standard has been
withdrawn or locked down via legal action such as this?
Lee Hyde.
--
We Americans claim to be a peace-loving
). The politics of this decision may be contentious to the
community (or rather this mailing list) but basing decisions on a
political platform such as this will only lead to LibO falling into
obscurity because it doesn't *just work*.
Regards,
Lee Hyde.
--
The division of mankind threatens
Foundation* should not be bogged down by
politics, else it'll run itself into the ground.
Kind Regards,
Lee Hyde.
On 03/01/11 03:17, Larry Gusaas wrote:
I guess I will quit wasting my time here and go back to just giving
support to OpenOffice.org users.
--
Patriotism is the last refuge
, the standardisation of language requires
(I assume) very different skill-sets to those required for coding, and
organisations like dicollect and wiktionary are probably best placed to
take the lead in that arena.
Also, I agree with everything Zaphod said.
Kind Regards,
Lee Hyde.
--
Patriotism is the last
On 01/01/11 17:35, Charles Marcus wrote:
What I think we are or should be striving for is to simply be the best
Office/Productivity software available, whether free or commercial.
We do and should NOT have to put Microsoft Office Down in order to raise
ourselves up. If we cannot stand on our
the above suggestion into
other territories involving language. Which is why I suggested starting
up a separate (from LibO) language standardisation project under the
broader banner of The Document Foundation.
Kind Regards
Lee Hyde
--
I foresee a universal information system (UIS), which will give
On 01/01/11 19:20, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
So, what am I saying? You don't NEED to add something useless like
Outlook or Evolution to LO. You just have to allow Thunderbird to
connect to it, and people can make their own choice as to whether they
want all the other bells and whistles.
On 31/12/10 16:00, sophie wrote:
You can reach them on the FR list, they are part of our community since
a long time. But adding the code won't be enough, there is a lot of work
behind that needs several hands. So my advice should be first to look
for a community to handle the effort.
Kind
On 22/11/10 17:50, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:52:41PM +, Lee Hyde wrote:
Nonsense. dpkg -i *.deb is user friendly, despite what you want to claim.
That graphical tools might make it difficult is no argument.
It is obvious that the dpkg method described is a more
On 22/11/10 17:58, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Beisde that, you agree that .deb is what users should know. How on earth are
they
then NOT to know how to install them? (And install all of debs one program
consists
of?)
I'm but a lowly Ubuntu user Rene, and I usually favour the use of
12 matches
Mail list logo
