On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
May I suggest we call time[1] on this discussion please?
+1
S.
[1] http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Time%20Gentlemen%20Please
- Sam Ruby
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h
(within their
ability to do so) to distribute this Work.
Thanks,
Sigrid
- Sam Ruby
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www
/msg29185.html
A full detail of the results of the vote will posted in about 27 hours.
André
- Sam Ruby
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http
, for the ongoing support!
EXCELLENT!
- Sam Ruby
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list
and consolidate there, choose a
name for the product ...)
The ASF is not a consortium. There is no mechanism for a foundation
to participate as an entity, only individuals.
I agree that naming is an important discussion.
- Sam Ruby
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h
. Ever.
- Sam Ruby
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived
to free yourself of constraints made by
historical choices. AGPLv3 and MPL are both possibilities, as well as
a number of others
Ian Lynch described the best case here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@documentfoundation.org/msg06533.html
- Sam Ruby
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 4 Jun 2011, at 19:06, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
I should think there is probably
broader commercial or legal reason for Oracle to hold on to the copyright
/msg06542.html
I will also note that these options are not mutually exclusive. There
could be a small core of close cooperation and a large amount of code
which could be the basis for the relicensing aspirations that I have
heard expressed numereous times on this list.
S.
- Sam Ruby
there is much work that would need to be done.
It will involve getting the consent of those that participate in this
foundation and LibreOffice to relicense their work. It won't be easy,
but I will be a part of making it happen.
- Sam Ruby
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h
, and as someone who is very interested in licensing
discussions, can I ask for recommendations as to where discussions as to
licensing should go?
Thank you
Volker
- Sam Ruby
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http
is the most appropriate choice. It is fully
compatible not only with GPLv3 and LGPLv3, but also with use in 100%
proprietary software.
Norbert
- Sam Ruby
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http
. Schulz.
- Sam Ruby
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list
list for discussions. Just in case, here are the details:
OK, I'm now subscribed there. Sorry for the noise/confusion.
- Sam Ruby
disc...@documentfoundation.org
Subscription: discuss+subscr...@documentfoundation.org
Digest subscription: discuss+subscribe-dig...@documentfoundation.org
Archives
over time as people make contributions based on the terms specified in
the Individual Contributor License Agreement and in the Apache
License, Version 2.0 itself.
- Sam Ruby
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http
.
- Sam Ruby
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived
their choice in licenses. However I
will state that in cases where widespread use of the code is vital for
advancing the cause of free software that the Apache License, Version
2.0 is an appropriate choice:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-recommendations.html
- Sam Ruby
--
Unsubscribe instructions
17 matches
Mail list logo
