Re: Re[2]: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java still broke on LibreOffice 5.1.1

RichardH wrote > Either fill out a bug report, > move this to the developer's list > or close this thread. Sorry, but it does NOT belong on the dev list. And all needed bugs are filed... OP was informed of such some time ago on the User ML: > ... Oracle must fix the JRE, or Apple must

[tdf-discuss] Re: Installing on Mac OS X

Larry, * Sorry, nothing new here. This is an open issue in the BZ tracker--please read tdf#89657 regards need for refactoring the packaging. Compounded by changes in Apple OS X codes igning requirements. The actual cause of the

[tdf-discuss] Re: Install path for LibreOffice under Windows

The enhancement was discussed at ESC mtg today ( http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/minutes-of-ESC-call-td4043820.html ) Install directory to be adjusted to LibreOffce 4, rather than dropping numbered versioning completely as proposed. Also won't adopt for 4.0.3, so soonest implementation

[tdf-discuss] Re: Install path for LibreOffice under Windows

Pedro wrote So my question is: is there any reason that LibreOffice under Windows does not install to \LibreOffice\? There are a few issues that make it problematic. Paramount is that the .MSI packaging for Microsoft Installer is kind of fragile, and Andras Timar is just one deep as primary