Hello David,
Le Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:42:12 +0800,
David Nelson comme...@traduction.biz a écrit :
Hi, :-)
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 00:52, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
yup. But after Michael's points, I also think we might clarify and
simplify all this a
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (22-11-10 11:50)
Hi guys,
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 01:57 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Cor Nouws schrieb:
Has been considered that this leads to a situation where each year
people have to get used to the tasks, the other board members etc. so
that maybe it is a
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 17:52 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
1) the ESC does not get to vote, it's not elected, and it's a technical
body. The AB can propose candidate(s), but cannot vote.
2) BoD appoints the CH, by vote or by consensus. People can nominate
themselves and send their
Hi guys,
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 01:57 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Cor Nouws schrieb:
Has been considered that this leads to a situation where each year
people have to get used to the tasks, the other board members etc. so
that maybe it is a bit inefficient?
This is fairly
Hello David,
Le Mon, 22 Nov 2010 21:03:21 +0800,
David Nelson comme...@traduction.biz a écrit :
Hi, :-)
Having been given permission to proofread and revise the initial
draft, I presumed it would be OK to do the same for subsequent
amendments. I hope I did not overstep myself there; if I
Hello,
Le Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:08:30 +,
Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com a écrit :
Hi there,
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 21:03 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
It seems that there are still some big ambiguities that would need
to be resolved:
Well detected :-)
The Chairperson
Hi Charles, :-)
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 00:18, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
thank you a lot for this!!!
No problem. I've got a watch on the page, and will visit whenever
there's a change then. ;-)
1) (however, ESC members who are also members of the BoD can
Hi Drew,
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 07:56 -0500, drew wrote:
May I ask here then, the term 'release team' is used above and this is a
question that has been on my mind for a few days.
Ah - the GNOME 'release team' is about as close as GNOME gets to having
a central body that stewards
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 16:07 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 07:56 -0500, drew wrote:
The ESC, do you see this as a very active group, for instance working as
the release team, meeting often and looking at individual issues?
Wrt. looking at individual issues,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote (14-11-10 13:49)
I have a question about the Board of Directors. I see that the draft
says all members are chosen every year (from the Community Members)
and that one can be member only twice consecutively.
Has been considered that this leads to a situation where each
Volker Merschmann wrote (16-11-10 22:14)
I have a question about the Board of Directors. I see that the draft says
all members are chosen every year (from the Community Members) and that one
can be member only twice consecutively.
Has been considered that this leads to a situation where each
Hi ,
Thorsten Behrens wrote (17-11-10 16:05)
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
possible solution: sponsor's paid developers shouldn't participate in
ESC as *single* persons. Contributions in their free time and
following cooptation in ESC should be carefully evaluated from BoD or
Membership Committee.
Hi, :-)
Could i have permission to proofread the draft community bye-laws
purely from a grammatical and punctuation viewpoint, and make the
necessary corrections, so as to eliminate these little things from
your debate, so that people can be discussing just the real meat of
the matter?
David
Hi, :-)
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 01:07, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Le Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:30:58 +0800,
David Nelson comme...@traduction.biz a écrit :
Hi, :-)
Could i have permission to proofread the draft community bye-laws
purely from a grammatical and
Hi Charles,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote (12-11-10 18:40)
please read the first real draft of the Community Bylaws here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/CommunityBylaws
Feel free to comment on our beloved discuss list.
Thanks for this draft. Looks really really good!
I have a question about
Hi Charles, *
thanks for this profound and important work!
Hello all,
please read the first real draft of the Community Bylaws here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/CommunityBylaws
done :-)
Feel free to comment on our beloved discuss list.
Do you mean this steering discuss list?
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:55:35 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Here's the result of our discussions with respect to the Community
bylaws so far.
Can we add some blurb in the long run on what the benefits/rights of members
are?
:-). Such as voting for a board of directors etc.
Sebastian
--
17 matches
Mail list logo
