Karl Swedberg schrieb:
When that jQuery book comes out, I hear it's going to have an awesome
Appendix dealing with closures. ;-)
No way!!
--
Jörn Zaefferer
http://bassistance.de
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
I have no formal programming training, so I often brute-force things that
could be a lot more elegant. One thing I'm struggling with in particular
now is the benefits of creating object prototypes over just storing data in
a global tree. A few people on this list have taken a shot at explaining
Daemach schrieb:
I have no formal programming training, so I often brute-force things
that could be a lot more elegant. One thing I'm struggling with in
particular now is the benefits of creating object prototypes over just
storing data in a global tree. A few people on this list have
Daemach schrieb:
I have no formal programming training, so I often brute-force things
that could be a lot more elegant. One thing I'm struggling with in
particular now is the benefits of creating object prototypes over just
storing data in a global tree. A few people on this list have
Cisco.com-Interface Development
A: ncy1717
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daemach
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:16 AM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: [jQuery] Gurus - best Javascript references?
I have
Nathan, you beat me to it!
That is best reference I've seen on identifier resolution and scope
chains. I *highly* recommend reading it as many times as it takes to
sink it. You'll be glad you did.
Mike
Here's a great article on closures, references, scope, etc:
] Gurus - best Javascript references?
I have no formal programming training, so I often brute-force
things that could be a lot more elegant. One thing I'm
struggling with in particular now is the benefits of creating
object prototypes over just storing data in a global tree. A
few people
10:16 AM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: [jQuery] Gurus - best Javascript references?
I have no formal programming training, so I often brute-force
things that could be a lot more elegant. One thing I'm
struggling with in particular now is the benefits of creating
object
.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._
.:
||:.
Nathan Young
Cisco.com-Interface Development
A: ncy1717
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daemach
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:16 AM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: [jQuery] Gurus - best
I picked up John's book over at http://ejohn.org/. He gets a few extra
pennies when you order thru his page!
On 3/23/07, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daemach schrieb:
I have no formal programming training, so I often brute-force things
that could be a lot more elegant. One thing I'm
I just ordered it myself along with Flanagan's book.
On 3/23/07, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daemach schrieb:
I have no formal programming training, so I often brute-force things
that could be a lot more elegant. One thing I'm struggling with in
particular now is the benefits of
Any recommendations? ;)
My stumbling block is the following:
I have a masking function that lets you define a mask for an input field:
$(#myInput).fieldMask((999) 999-) This lets me force an input into
a certain pattern. At the moment I have a root global object which is just
a place to
12 matches
Mail list logo
