index3.html and index2.html both fail in IE7 but only index2.html
fails in IE6. I really doubt this has anything to do with how jQuery
applies the opacity in IE but more to do with IE and its filter.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 12/7/06, Kelvin Luck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandon Aaron wrote:
> > S
Brandon Aaron wrote:
> So in my little bit of testing IE7 shows that the filter is applied
> because the text has the smoothing removed. Also, it only works for me
> (IE6 and 7) by removing position: relative; and it doesn't matter if
> it has a width or not. Position absolute made it fail also.
>
So in my little bit of testing IE7 shows that the filter is applied
because the text has the smoothing removed. Also, it only works for me
(IE6 and 7) by removing position: relative; and it doesn't matter if
it has a width or not. Position absolute made it fail also.
I ran into some weird CSS issu
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback, I've put my comments in below...
Dave Methvin wrote:
>>> OK - I've managed to break the problem down to a simple test case:
>>>
>>> http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/
>>>
>>> As you will see, the fade doesn't happen in IE but the callback does.
>>> If you g
On 12/7/06, Dave Methvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, $('fade-me').attr('opacity', 0.5) document.ready gives an IE script
> error in jQuery.attr on the line with elem.filter, because style.filter is
> undefined at that point. Even after fixing that, IE doesn't honor the
> opacity although I
>> OK - I've managed to break the problem down to a simple test case:
>>
>> http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/
>>
>> As you will see, the fade doesn't happen in IE but the callback does.
>> If you get rid of position:relative or any width in the styles of the
>> UL then the fade works f
Brice Burgess wrote:
> Kelvin Luck wrote:
>> OK - I've managed to break the problem down to a simple test case:
>>
>> http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/
>>
>> As you will see, the fade doesn't happen in IE but the callback does.
>> If you get rid of position:relative or any width in the
Kelvin Luck wrote:
> OK - I've managed to break the problem down to a simple test case:
>
> http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/
>
> As you will see, the fade doesn't happen in IE but the callback does. If
> you get rid of position:relative or any width in the styles of the UL
> then the
OK - I've managed to break the problem down to a simple test case:
http://kelvinluck.com/assets/jquery/fadeBug/
As you will see, the fade doesn't happen in IE but the callback does. If
you get rid of position:relative or any width in the styles of the UL
then the fade works fine...
Any ideas?
I've still got the issue with r670 (built from svn about an hour ago) so
I guess I should put together an example page? Seems like it's a
different issue...
Cheers,
Kelvin :)
Brandon Aaron wrote:
> It is a known issue. The next release should be just around the corner
> ... or just grab the la
It is a known issue. The next release should be just around the corner
... or just grab the latest from svn.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 12/5/06, Kelvin Luck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any known issues with 1.0.3 and the latest svn which should
> effect fadeTo in IE? On a page I'm buil
Hi,
Is there any known issues with 1.0.3 and the latest svn which should
effect fadeTo in IE? On a page I'm building it seems fadeTo is being
ignored (although the callback for after the animation is still firing).
Of course everything works fine in Firefox...
If it's not a known issue I'll at
12 matches
Mail list logo
