I'd be
happy to help you out Yehuda. I could even shoot it past my wife...she does
editing duties for a travel book writer who recently released a new
book.
!//--andy matthewsweb
developercertified advanced coldfusion programmerICGLink,
Inc.[EMAIL PROTECTED]615.370.1530
Are you saying that there should be a section on jQuery set aside for womens
issues?
Did I say such a thing? :-D
I just point to the fact that using invalid XHTML will discourage *some*
XHTML-savvy users, as putting a bimbo picture on the Magazine (p 12) -- with
no explanation whatsoever of
On 9/26/06, Fil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you saying that there should be a section on jQuery set aside for womens issues?Did I say such a thing?:-DI just point to the fact that using invalid XHTML will discourage *some*XHTML-savvy users, as putting a bimbo picture on the Magazine (p 12) --
Lol!
I agree though! When it comes to HTML in sample code, it's always good to
have it XHTML standards compliant. That way, people won't complain that your
code won't validate.
We call them 'validation nazi's by the way! ;)
Klaus Hartl wrote:
I'd like to review HTML stuff if desired*. For
No matter. No harm done! :)
Dan
Karl Swedberg-2 wrote:
I see. Point taken, and appreciated. I'm afraid my reply may have
sounded more offended and/or defensive than I had intended it. I
wanted to put an emoticon in there somewhere to indicate that I
wasn't wrapped around the axle
On Sep 26, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Dan Atkinson wrote:
I'm referring to the ones on Digg!
Ah! Good to know.
As for the term 'grammar nazi', it's a fairly legitimate term:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammar_nazi
No offence was implied by the use of 'nazi', it's just a regularly
used
On Sep 26, 2006, at 5:59 AM, Dan Atkinson wrote:
I would have just ignored the grammar nazis. Sometimes it's fun to
make
mistakes and bait these guys.
Wow! Don't you think that might be a little harsh? Nobody on this
list as far as I could tell meant any disrespect by calling out typos
I'd be happy to.
Feel free to Gmail me - (dandementia) about it if you'd like.
wycats wrote:
I, for one, was quite pleased with the corrections, and may call on some
of
the list members who made corrections to proofread the magazine in future
issues. Anyone interested?
-- Yehuda
On
On Sep 26, 2006, at 9:40 AM, Yehuda Katz wrote:I, for one, was quite pleased with the corrections, and may call on some of the list members who made corrections to proofread the magazine in future issues. Anyone interested?I'd love to help out. As a former high-school and college writing
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Dan Atkinson
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 4:59 AM
To: discuss@jquery.com
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Magazine Typo corrections
I would have just ignored the grammar nazis. Sometimes it's fun to make
mistakes and bait these guys.
wycats wrote:
With the exception
Guess what? I'm a pretty strong feminist myself. The constant use of the
Devo hat throughout the magazine should provide a clue that the three-tiered
object is some kind of jQuery icon.
Yeah, I had figured this :) The misunderstanding came from the fact that I
had never seen the DEVO logo
I would have just ignored the grammar nazis. Sometimes it's fun to make
mistakes and bait these guys.
wycats wrote:
With the exception of the semantic issues, I have corrected the errors
that
have been reported. The updated issue (which also has several other small
improvements) can be
Karl Swedberg schrieb:
I'd love to help out. As a former high-school and college writing
instructor, maybe I still have a bit of the grammar nazi in me after
all. ;-)
How on earth could possibly someone running a site named 'englishrules'
not be a grammar nazi?
-- Jörn
With the exception of the semantic issues, I have corrected the errors that have been reported. The updated issue (which also has several other small improvements) can be downloaded at
http://www.visualjquery.com/magazine.html-- Yehuda KatzWeb Developer | Wycats Designs(ph)718.877.1325
14 matches
Mail list logo
