dear all,
i'm using $(elm).load(url, function() {...}) to insert new content, but i
found this cost me extra 3-5 times than
using standar ajax methods, and then insert responseText to elm using
innerHTML.
inserting simple content, using standard ajax cost me 0.2s but using jquery
cost me 1.1s
all the words look good, but that trailing comma I noticed a while
back that firefox permits it... safari doesn't like it.
On 1/17/07, Kenneth Love [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all.
I have a bit of JQuery magic that works great in Firefox, but not in Safari
or IE at all. Here's the code:
What kinds of select strings are you using ( $(in here) ). This can have a
big impact on speed.
Blair
On 1/18/07, byan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dear all,
i'm using $(elm).load(url, function() {...}) to insert new content, but i
found this cost me extra 3-5 times than
using standar ajax
The jQuery ajax methods take callbacks which are run when the data is
recieved/loaded, so:
$(...).load(url,params,function(){
$('.notify',this).fadeOut('slow'); // '.notify',this, looks for .notify
elements inside the element being updated
});
Blair
On 1/17/07, Vaska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jake:
Thanks a lot, that worked great for Safari. Everything is now hidden in IE,
though, and clicking doesn't show it. Any ideas there?
On 1/17/07, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
all the words look good, but that trailing comma I noticed a while
back that firefox permits it... safari
Actually, using an id is as good as it gets. Sorry, that's the only thing I
could think of that would effect the speed so much.
Blair
On 1/18/07, byan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have page like this
body
div id=cleft/div
div id=cmain/div
div id=cright/div
/body
new content always fetch into
j. siefer wrote:
--
.Draggable({
zIndex:1000,
ghosting:true,
opacity:0.5,
containment:[_dtP.left,_dtP.top,_dtP.w,_dtP.h],
insideParent:true
})
---
Hi,
i have
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
