2006/10/4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is it possible to extend this accordion such that I maintain its
> features and can then extend it with new features?
>
The code of accordion (dian?) is pretty locked... means, no way to extend it.
But I could integrate your new features if you
Hi I am using the jq-corner.js written by Dave Methvin. I was wondering how I
could add a option for color when calling the corner.
$("#content").corner("round tl 10px color");
Heres the script
//
// jq-corner.js - JQuery method for creating corner effects
//
// If this works, it was written b
no comments? did you even like my puppy? did any versions work in IE?
No safari gurus out there? does Jan Sorgalla have any idea?
On 10/2/06, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My first jquery page was to celebrate my new puppy, I had a few
> pictures, and I read about JCarousel, so it was simple
I rooted around in some Atlas stuff I found on the web and saw some uses,
but not a definition, of their $() function. Do you know where it is
defined?
> I'd love to talk our developers out of using Atlas altogether,
> but as a designer I lack the appropriate credentials in
> this department. ...
>That's cool. How does this get around the "no opening content from
>other domains" restriction?
>-pat
I think that the bookmarklet is running locally so it gets around the domain
restrictions.
This is kind of like something I was considering. I used to write occasional
HTA files to complete t
Anyone else use Jesse Ruderman's js shell?
http://www.squarefree.com/categories/javascript-shell/
I love that thing, use it every day. Using this
I'm in the process of compiling a jQuery widget pack for forms. I will probably release it together with the second issue of the Visual jQuery Magazine. I've posted about this before, so if you want to bring a widget to my attention, please post about it here or email me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] offli
Klaus,Thanks. I discovered that solution on my own, but right on the money. Re: the bad XHTML, you're correct. I was trying to come up with an example for the question, and I guess I failed. Still, thanks!-- Yehuda
On 10/3/06, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yehuda Katz schrieb:> Say I have
> However, relying on this behavior may be risky -
> the Douglas Crockford quote on the
> following page comes to mind:
In fact, it is the complete opposite of 'risky' - it is very safe.
It's not going to change anytime in the foreseeable future
(considering that it would require every single bro
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Patrick Hall wrote:
>> On 10/3/06, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Another mention of JQuery, this time in a bookmarklet.
>>
>> http://blogs.pathf.com/agileajax/2006/10/using_bookmarkl.html
>
> That's cool. How does this get around the "no opening content from
> other d
On 10/3/06, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another mention of JQuery, this time in a bookmarklet.
>
> http://blogs.pathf.com/agileajax/2006/10/using_bookmarkl.html
That's cool. How does this get around the "no opening content from
other domains" restriction?
-pat
--
ᗷɭoℊẚᗰսɳᑯѲ⁈⁈⁈
__
This does limit the $().hover and $().toggle to once per an element.
Multiple uses will overwrite the pervious handler. Any tips on how to
manage this along with keeping the un version would be greatly
appreciated.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 10/3/06, Brandon Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I've
yeah... it hurt for a while because I used to overridemimetype for my
htmls and JQ doesn't.
On 10/3/06, Matt Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Jake, that was the problem exactly. My PHP script was sending
> the XML string with a Content-Type of text/html. Once I changed it to
> text/xml,
1 more vote for John's approach the documention can explain that
these functions can be run destructively or non-destructively. It's a
beauty!
On 10/3/06, Blair McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to adding my vote.
>
> I like Johns approach because it fits in with the style of other jQ
Well I've gone ahead and done it. I've added an unhover and untoggle method.
Here is the example/test page:
http://brandonaaron.net/jquery/unevents/unevents.html
Here is the patch: http://brandonaaron.net/jquery/unevents/unevents.diff
--
Brandon Aaron
On 10/3/06, Brandon Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another mention of JQuery, this time in a bookmarklet.
http://blogs.pathf.com/agileajax/2006/10/using_bookmarkl.html
Rey...
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Okay so I've modified the offset plugin to take an optional param
called referenceElement. If passed in, then it will be used to get the
relative offset. Now here is the situation. If the referenceElement is
a parent, then the number is positive. If the referenceElement is a
child, then the number
> Thought it would be more useful on the website until it was decided
> whether it might be included with the form plugin. Mike (Alsup), is it
> ultimately your call how this gets incorporated? I liked Brian's idea to
> use a boolean argument for semantic order, and it should be trivial to
> add th
FYI, I posted the FastSerialize plugin in the jQuery wiki:
http://jquery.com/docs/Plugins/FastSerialize/
Thought it would be more useful on the website until it was decided
whether it might be included with the form plugin. Mike (Alsup), is it
ultimately your call how this gets incorporated? I li
http://interface.eyecon.ro/demos/sort_floats.htmlBlairOn 10/3/06, Dominik Hahn <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hello,
Is it possible to create a Sortable Puzzle with jQuery (probably using Interface) to create something like this:
http://wiki.script.aculo.us/scriptaculous/page/print/SortableFloatsDemot
> So... is there any chance, to use an ajax-call in the unload-function? Or is
> this simply not possible?
Most likely not possible - all in-progress AJAX requests are canceled
whenever you leave a page. Doing the image src trick is probably your
best bet.
--John
___
Just to adding my vote.I like Johns approach because it fits in with the style of other jQuery methods. All the event and attribute methods have two sided functionality (bind/unbind, set/get), so it makes sense that the filtering methods would also have two sided functionality (persistent filter/no
Thanks, Jake, that was the problem exactly. My PHP script was sending
the XML string with a Content-Type of text/html. Once I changed it to
text/xml, jQuery was all sexy again.
m.
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 14:06 -0700, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ wrote:
> Since I can't see what your script is or how your server is serving
Hello John,
thanks for the answer. The bind("unload") is working right now. One
further question: I would like finaly to log-off the user from the
AjaxChat, if he leaves the page. So I tried this:
$(window).bind("unload", function() {
$.load("logoff.html");
});
This does not work. This work
Since I can't see what your script is or how your server is serving
it.. I'll share my experience
when you get a pure xml file or a cgi created xml file with the
correct headers the parameter 'xml' is actually a dom tree. If it is a
"text/whateveelse" mimetype, you get text only! no dom!
Down ins
Hi all,
Glaring newbie here, please be gentle. I'm working on some UI widgets
built using jQuery. I started by extending the simple accordion code
found on the plugins page (http://fmarcia.info/jquery/accordion.html),
and so far I've got this:
http://redmonk.net/files/tmp/js/accordion2.html
I've
Hi Matt,
Thanks again for the patch. I just found the time to test it out and it
seems to work nicely so I have integrated it into the date picker plugin,
Cheers,
Kelvin :)
>
> On Thu, September 28, 2006 5:06 am, Matt Good wrote:
>> The datePicker plugin[1] won't work for multiple date inputs
Glad to see that Remy posted it here. Now, others such as myself that
didn't see Remy's original posting can benefit from my follow-up email.
Rey...
Dan Atkinson wrote:
> http://www.nabble.com/Upgraded-Plugin%3A-Spy-tf2362753.html#a6582559
___
jQuery
Jason,
I had a similar problem which ended up being a problem with the way that
my server-side programming language, ColdFusion, was returning the rows.
There was a ton of leading and trailing spaces in the response packet so
once I trimmed that, it was able to insert my rows successfully. My c
>
> Whenever you .load() html the incoming scripts are automatically
> evaluated. To make that happen with $.ajax() you need to specify the
> dataType property. If you want HTML to come back with embedded
>
> 1) This is never working:
> $(window).unload(function() {
> $.get(url);
> });
>
> I simply don't get it to work. How to add an unload-event for
> document/window?
Right now there's some ambiguity between removing a load handler and
adding an unload event, I recommend that you use:
$
Disregard. I solved the problem.
m.
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 12:56 -0800, Matt Grimm wrote:
> I was under the impression that the following code should work, but I'm
> having no luck at all. I have a PHP script that returns a simple XML
> string and I need to get the value of the one and only elemen
http://www.nabble.com/Upgraded-Plugin%3A-Spy-tf2362753.html#a6582559
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/NEWS%3A-JQuery-Digg-Spy-Updated-tf2377394.html#a6629182
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery ma
Hello,
I'm using jQuery since a few days, switched totally from prototyp.js to
jQuery and there a now a few questions:
1) This is never working:
$(window).unload(function() {
$.get(url);
});
I simply don't get it to work. How to add an unload-event for
document/window?
2) I have a
On 10/3/06, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about using 'px' as default unit? That way you could write:
> $().top(10).left(10) - and the 'px' is added automatically. In case a
> string is passed you would take that value as is:
> $().top('10%').left('10%').
That works for me.
--
Bra
Okay ... So instead of this:
while ( p && p != this ) try { p = p.parentNode } catch(e) { p = null; };
I should have set p = this like this:
while ( p && p != this ) try { p = p.parentNode } catch(e) { p = this; };
You can see it working here:
http://brandonaaron.net/jquery/hoverbug/hover.patched
I was under the impression that the following code should work, but I'm
having no luck at all. I have a PHP script that returns a simple XML
string and I need to get the value of the one and only element.
$.get('/path/to/script', function(xml) {
// xml variable is '1'
// r variable is []
Brandon Aaron schrieb:
> I was also thinking about taking a hash of top and left as a param.
> The top and left would be numbers to relatively offset the element by.
> This sounds like what you are talking about and would remove the
> annoyance of the + 'px' all over the place. However, the call w
Sure enough... looking into a better fix now.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 10/3/06, Choan C. Gálvez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> There has been some recent posts on this mailing list about a bug in
> Firefox related to jQuery`s `hover` functionality. (Subjects "Uncaught
> exception (Autocomple
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Brandon Aaron wrote:
> On 10/3/06, Dave Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not too crazy about .top() and .left() because of the need to
>> concatenate and un-concatenate 'px' everywhere.
>
> I can understand this and it is something I'm trying to decide how I
> want to
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
> Jason Levine schrieb:
>> I've updated JTicker to 0.5 Beta now. I added the ability to have multiple
>> tickers on a single page. This was a feature I really wanted to add and had
>> to learn a lot of new JavaScript to implement it. So it was a win-win
>> situation fo
Do you have a URL that we can reference? That would help us to debug
the problem.
--John
On 10/3/06, Glen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I continue to get "jQuery is not defined" on each page load.
>
> According to http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/64/, this is coming from
> the interface plugins not
Hi all.
There has been some recent posts on this mailing list about a bug in
Firefox related to jQuery`s `hover` functionality. (Subjects "Uncaught
exception (Autocomplete / jQuery 1.0.1)", "bug: hover over table cells
containing form elements" and "Input text hover error".)
Theoretically, this b
I ran into this problem today, trying to replace the contents of a ,
but so far John's suggested workaround isn't quite doing the trick. .load()
works everywhere except in IE.
Using alternate code as suggested:
$.get('/path/to/ajax/page/', function(thehtml){
$("tbody#foo").empty().append
Yehuda Katz schrieb:
> Say I have something like this:
>
> $("p").attr("rel", "someRel")
>
> But instead of setting it as static, I want to set it based upon the
> attributes of the p's in question. For instance, say I want to set the
> rel to be the same as the class. Is there any way to get
It's nice that we agree on so many levels! ! It's even good when we
don't! at least we learn about other opinions!
--
Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ
▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒
░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░
▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒
░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░
▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒░▒
___
On 10/3/06, Brandon Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> look like this: $().offset({ top: 10, left: 10 }); I guess that is
> less typing than: $().top(10+'px').left(10+'px');
I really meant to say that it isn't much of an advantage over doing it
with top and left.
--
Brandon Aaron
___
On 10/3/06, Dave Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not too crazy about .top() and .left() because of the need to
> concatenate and un-concatenate 'px' everywhere.
I can understand this and it is something I'm trying to decide how I
want to handle. The offset plugin I wrote returns a unit-l
Is there a reason why there isn't an unhover and an untoggle? I could
really use unhover in my current project and was thinking about
building it and just logging it as an enhancement. Just calling
.unmouseover().unmouseout() is not enough b/c I have other handlers
for those as well and don't want
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Brandon Aaron wrote:
> jQuery has two methods named .top() and .left() for setting the top
> and left offset via css. I just wrote a plugin for getting the offset
> of an element and did some pretty extensive cross-browser testing.
I'm not too crazy about .top() and .left() be
Jason Levine schrieb:
> I've updated JTicker to 0.5 Beta now. I added the ability to have multiple
> tickers on a single page. This was a feature I really wanted to add and had
> to learn a lot of new JavaScript to implement it. So it was a win-win
> situation for me. ;-) I hope you like i
jQuery has two methods named .top() and .left() for setting the top
and left offset via css. I just wrote a plugin for getting the offset
of an element and did some pretty extensive cross-browser testing.
Here is the blog entry:
http://brandonaaron.net/articles/2006/10/02/jquery-plugin-offset
--
B
Say I have something like this:$("p").attr("rel", "someRel")But instead of setting it as static, I want to set it based upon the attributes of the
p's in question. For instance, say I want to set the rel to be the same as the class. Is there any way to get access to the DOM element being worked on
Is there any plan to add jQuery methods to retrieve and set the
coordinates of an element on the page? It seems like a good addition to
dimensions.js, perhaps. Here's what I currently use:
$.fn.x = function(n) {
var result = null;
this.each(function() {
var o = this;
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Michael Geary wrote:
> No need to go to the extra work. jquery.js begins with this:
>
> window.undefined = window.undefined;
>
> So "undefined" exists in every browser. This is a handy line of code to put
> in any JavaScript - it's completely compatible with both old and new
>
I've updated JTicker to 0.5 Beta now. I added the ability to have multiple
tickers on a single page. This was a feature I really wanted to add and had to
learn a lot of new JavaScript to implement it. So it was a win-win situation
for me. ;-) I hope you like it too:
http://www.jasons-tool
I continue to get "jQuery is not defined" on each page load.
According to http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/64/, this is coming from
the interface plugins not being used with the latest version of jquery.
I've made sure that I have the latest stable versions of both jquery
& interface, yet this
> Also notice that .innerHTML (and thus jQuery's .html() method) doesn't
> always return the live checked state. In IE it tracks any dynamic changes to
> the script, but in Firefox it only reflects the initial state from the
> source. You can see the form text by putting this into the URL:
>
> java
Ah, this isn't a browser bug, but something of a jQuery one.
removeAttr does obj.removeAttribute("checked") under the hood, which
is not sufficient to remove these built-in properties. It would have
to do obj.checked = undefined; or some such under the hood.
--John
On 10/3/06, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL
>>> John, these are great additions, but please be advised that in some
>>> browsers this.attr('checked', 'checked') won't work as expected.
>>
>> Do you know which browsers those are offhand? It'll help me to test
>> the methods, when I make them
>
> I think there are overall inconstencies. I
thanks John! That's what I was after.
- Original Message From: John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: jQuery Discussion. Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2006 8:27:44 PMSubject: Re: [jQuery] Rev: 259, where is now?
I do have one pre-built one that I re-generate every couple days, youcan find it here:ht
> > $.fn.checked = function(b) {
> >if ( b || b == undefined )
> >this.attr( "checked", "checked" );
> >else
> >this.removeAttr( "checked" );
> > };
> I strongly suggest you to compare if a variable is equal to
> undefined using the typeof unary operator, because if you,
John Resig schrieb:
>> John, these are great additions, but please be advised that in some
>> browsers this.attr('checked', 'checked') won't work as expected.
>
> Do you know which browsers those are offhand? It'll help me to test
> the methods, when I make them
I think there are overall inconst
Hi,
> I wasn't claiming that for was any less great than each! I was
> complaining about looping a concat vs. doing a join at t the end...
Erm, did I discuss that somewhere? You answered to my posting. The concat vs.
join stuff was Sam.
My point was to take the check for XMLSerializer out of th
leandro nascimento camarg schrieb:
> I strongly suggest you to compare if a variable is equal to undefined using
> the typeof unary operator, because if you, someday, dicide to get these
> things work on IE 5, you can not compare to the undefined constant (?),
> after all, it doesn't exist on IE 5.
I sent an email yesterday, but maybe it didn't got through.
Anyway, this is it:
I have this simple markup:
componentDom.innerHTML =
I'm executing this xpath calls with the following results:
$('form/[EMAIL PROTECTED]', componentDom).length = 3
$('form/[EMA
I do have one pre-built one that I re-generate every couple days, you
can find it here:
http://jquery.com/src/jquery-svn.js
Having a nice historical listing would be nice too, as you suggest -
but this should be good for now.
--John
On 10/3/06, Andrea Ercolino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ok
>
I use to have all the *type selectors implemented, but after a quick
survery I couldn't find anyone who actually used them (and who
could've just used :nth-child() instead). Although, its' probably a
good idea to have these in an external plugin, for completeness, in
case anyone wants them. Good wo
Raziel Alvarez schrieb:
> I've been testing and I see many really simple XPath queries that just
> don't work, or they even break.
>
> Is this broken in jQuery? Are they working for somebody?
jQuery does not claim to implement the XPath standard. It just supports
a small subset, and these shoul
I've been testing and I see many really simple XPath queries that just don't work, or they even break.
Is this broken in jQuery? Are they working for somebody?
thanks
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
The jquery.com plugins page has a couple validators listed:
Form Validation (no AJAX)
http://fuzz.bassistance.de/jQueryFormValidation/validateTest.html
Add validation rules to your markup and apply the form plugin to
your form. Work is still in progress. Have a look at the different
examples
I wasn't claiming that for was any less great than each! I was
complaining about looping a concat vs. doing a join at t the end...
and other micro effeciencies. I gave up tiny-tuning code when I gave
up assembler.
I tell this to all my programmers, You can't compare a little
application code time
That's a lot of stuff!
Seriously, I think that what is being requested here, more than anything
else, is organization.
Can we start grouping our code into "plugin packs", or something? One for
forms and friends, one for all kinds of visual effects (perhaps a package
that groups the "best of the
Hello,Is it possible to create a Sortable Puzzle with jQuery (probably using Interface) to create something like this: http://wiki.script.aculo.us/scriptaculous/page/print/SortableFloatsDemothanks,Dominik___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://j
I strongly suggest you to compare if a variable is equal to undefined using
the typeof unary operator, because if you, someday, dicide to get these
things work on IE 5, you can not compare to the undefined constant (?),
after all, it doesn't exist on IE 5.0. Compare like this one:
if(b || typeof
What about you doing something like this:
$.fn.checked = function(b) {
b && this.attr('checked', 'checked') || this.removeAttr('checked');
}
but doing this we counting on both *attr* and *removeAttr* methods return
*true* on success (at least *attr* method).
John Resig wrote:
>
> $.fn.chec
One thing I'd also like to request is a complete form widgets plugin. At the
moment there are a plethora of form widgets, each of them single plugins.
That's not very useful for someone that wants something that gets included
once and called multiple times. Ideally, someone would come out with a fo
ok
Now I understand that there is no release newer thah the 249, which is currently linked as the latest one in jquery.com
Would it be possible to post a build, once in a while?
The dev page in jquery.com should be the right place for a section of this type.
<
Latest Rev: 387 (to be built). P
Actually I've built a library much like the one you are using for
in-house at our company and was thinking about porting it to a jQuery
plugin because I haven't seen one like it yet either.
--
Brandon
On 10/3/06, Andy Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I've been using a form validation lib
I saw this on Ajaxian and I'm not sure if its been posted here but this
JQuery Digg Spy has been updated:
http://leftlogic.com/info/articles/jquery_spy2
Rey..
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
So I've been using a form validation library called TMT_validator for the
last year or so. It's very full-featured (probably a little too
full-featured for what I need it for). But it's the best one I've found. I
just checked the plugins page for form validation libraries and really only
found one
2006/10/3, Andrea Ercolino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Thanks Franck, but I feel a dummy now.
> Where is the link to download this 387 version?
>
There's currently no prebuilt jquery.js from svn. You must do it
yourself using a svn client. On Windows, you can use TortoireSVN
(http://tortoisesvn.net/)
OK, I've made several modifications thanks to your suggestions and
corrections. This is publishable; should I go ahead and create a new
wiki page under Plugins or maybe wait until it's decided whether this
will be merged somehow with the existing form plugin?
m.
---
$.fn.fastSerialize = function
Thanks Franck, but I feel a dummy now.
Where is the link to download this 387 version?
- Original Message From: Franck Marcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: jQuery Discussion. Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2006 6:09:43 PMSubject: Re: [jQuery] Rev: 259, where is now?
> I don't know how I got Rev: 259,
Good point, Jörn. Not only would you want to be able to submit an empty
string value for an option, but if the "value" attribute is excluded
from the option tag, this.value will return the text between the tags
anyway.
m.
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 11:17 +0200, Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
> Matt Grimm schri
The "option:selected" is the only syntax that has worked for me in the
past. The XPath method only gets those options that literally have an
attribute of "selected" in the XHTML.
I also agree with you on the matter of excluding this.id as a fallback
for n. It's unnecessary and possibly confusing b
> I don't know how I got Rev: 259, because current latest is 249. I wandered
> around but I cannot find a link to it in jquery.com.
>
The last rev is #387, accessible via svn (http://jquery.com/src/)
> 259 works better with IE than 249
> For example, 259 let me access tabs in a pre tag, while 249
Good call, I've updated it to use your syntax for "f". Added benefit:
the selector reads "f this".
m.
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 00:35 -0700, Michael Geary wrote:
> Nice.
>
> You could simplify this:
>
> var f = ['INPUT', 'TEXTAREA', 'SELECT', 'BUTTON'];
> $(f.join(','), this).each(function(
Thanks for catching this Klaus, I've updated the code to normalize tag
names.
m.
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 11:21 +0200, Klaus Hartl wrote:
>
> Klaus Hartl schrieb:
> > Please make it XHTML as XML compatible (hm, why is it always me
> > complaining about that?)...:
>
>
> There's missing a part, I'
thanks, but really I meant "where do I get a Rev >= 259?"
- Original Message From: Webunity | Gilles van den Hoven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: jQuery Discussion. Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2006 6:06:34 PMSubject: Re: [jQuery] Rev: 259, where is now?
Andrea Ercolino wrote:> I don't know how I got
I don't know how I got Rev: 259, because current latest is 249. I wandered around but I cannot find a link to it in jquery.com.
259 works better with IE than 249
For example, 259 let me access tabs in a pre tag, while 249 doesn't
___
jQuery mailing lis
Brian wrote:
> Looks good, but please don't use "eval" as the function name. It's a Bad
> Idea to overload reserved/predefined words, even if namespaced.
Oops, sorry. I was going to rename it before submitting the suggestion.
How about:
evalScript()
exec()
execScript()
a
> any ideas?
>
maybe evaluate()?
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Andrea Ercolino wrote:
> I don't know how I got Rev: 259, because current latest is 249. I
> wandered around but I cannot find a link to it in jquery.com.
Each time someone of the developers (like me) commit something, the
version number is increased. Therefore since your last download, 10
commi
Looks good, but please don't use "eval" as the function name. It's a Bad
Idea to overload reserved/predefined words, even if namespaced.
- Brian
> $.fn.eval = function(callback) {
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss
2006/10/3, Mark Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The solution is to wait for each script to load before executing the
> next. Here's my solution as a plugin:
>
It reminds me of a post I made: http://jquery.com/discuss/2006-June/005496/.
It was not specific to scripts loads but could be tweaked to wo
nice. i like that regular expression example. but i agree that the split
method is probably quicker. thanks
Christof Donat wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> i want to grab just the filename and extension from the following string:
>>
>> str1="F:\\Test1\\Test2\\Test3\\test.txt";
>>
>> i want to grab "test
Hi Guys,
I have decided to share my subModal class. I started this "lightbox" of
me right after i saw the first lightbox for prototype (so i have been
coding on this one for almost 1 year now). It is going to have a lot of
features and will off-course be shared with you guys. At the current
st
Hi,
> i want to grab just the filename and extension from the following string:
>
> str1="F:\\Test1\\Test2\\Test3\\test.txt";
>
> i want to grab "test.txt"
>
> i use this code:
>
> file1=(str1.split("\\"))[(str1.split("\\")).length-1];
>
> i was wondering if there is a better way to grab that part
yes. this was the elegance i was looking for. thx
Blair Mitchelmore-2 wrote:
>
> To avoid running split twice, you could do it this way (removes IE5 from
> compatibility however):
>
> var file1 = str1.split("\\").pop();
>
> -blair
>
> Tombo wrote:
>> this might not be jquery related, but
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
