In IE or not in IE, I think that essential calculations in rotator.js
referencing to document.body should be performed on $(document).ready - this
is what this function is for. After implementing this change and making
necessary adjustments, there is no problem with IE more.
With simpler
Hi,
I'm experiencing the same.
Probably this is due to overhelming popularity of jQuery after reaching rel.
1.0.
Everybody in the world is trying to get latest version...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-jQuery.com--tf2177454.html#a6021489
Sent from the
John Resig wrote:
It's not so much an issue of jQuery ignoring the style element - it's
an issue of browsers ignoring it. If memory serves me correctly, using
style elements and innerHTML is particularly dicey.
Couldn't STYLE tags in delivered HTML snippet be stripped out and inserted
John Resig wrote:
Brandon -
For example, Prototype has
Object.extend(), jQuery has jQuery.extend() - they work nearly
identically.
--John
On 8/31/06, Brandon Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1] http://dean.edwards.name/base/Base.js
Brandon Aaron
I hope that jQuery.create()
John Resig wrote:
(...)Please, if you spot 'bugs', missing pages, let me know. (...)
--John
1. I would prefer links to other pages be accessible on the top or in a side
column, not in the bottom part. I have to scroll down to switch to another
page. This is annoying.
2. On main page,
Blair McKenzie-2 wrote:
Is there any reason not to simply use a javascript snipit in a script tag?
There are good reasons to put code at the start of a page or in a separate
file, but in this case I would say that putting it at the top of the
relevant tag is perfectly reasonable:
ul
I've experienced many problems when converting date from database to usable
format, so your work is great.
But copying date taken after pressing Current time, from:
Current Time in ODBCDateTime format: {ts '2006-11-9 14:57:5'}
and pasting it into Enter a string to convert box, gives an error:
Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
(...)
Or escape the expression so we know it is explicitly XPath, or provide
a separate function that is dedicated to XPath.
-Steve
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Both
New layout is great and much more efficient.
Two remarks:
- after going in one branch, e.g. DOM, deeper in hierarchy, e.g. showing
path 'DOM /Manipulation /clone()', and switching to another branch, e.g.
Effects, the path reads: 'Effects /Manipulation /clone()';
- pressing Ctrl, Shift or Alt
John Resig wrote:
jQuery 1.1 has just been released, ...
This is really a great thing. I am looking onto jQuery architecture,
development and possibilities with great interest and admiration.
John Resig wrote:
..., along with an overhaul of the site design, ...
Some remarks to the
Hi,
It seems that each developer can prove his results are the best. I've just
compared the following sites:
http://john.jquery.com/speed/ http://john.jquery.com/speed/ (comparing
jQold and jQuery as delivered by JResig - obviously new jQuery won, second
column)
11 matches
Mail list logo