Screen Flow http://varasoftware.com/products/screenflow/ might look
like a better alternative for just $50 more: build-in viewer-editor,
capturing both camera and screen images with ability to arrange them
later. Plus Mic/System sound recording%u2026
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I really live a FREE tool called OvoLogger. it's just for taking
notes (well, actually, it's a lot more than that but only the
note-taking part is free).
You can't catch mouseclicks with it but otherwise, it gives you much
of Morae functionality. You can measure task completion times, you
can
If you're willing to give up the ability to moderate a usability
session then for $19 per tester you can outsource the whole thing to
www.UserTesting.com (I work there). We've built an online network of
pre-screened user testers who can think out loud and stay on task
without a moderator. So you
Hey all, I'm doing some research on different tiers of usability testing,
and I love the new Silverback app that Clear Left just put out (
http://www.silverbackapp.com/) as a potential lower-end solution (we already
have partnerships in place for the high-end services). Are there any other
apps
I've used Morae in the past. It's sort of like Silverback (from what I
can see on the site), but more sophisticated. Main differences:
- it's Windows based
- in addition to recording sessions, you can stream live to observers'
computers
- it has tools for annotating sessions and creating
I am not sure what to think of Silverback, I like a really simple
solution that works really well if you do on-site testing. But Morae
(UserVue) has great remote usability testing posiblites. And nowdays for
testing websites, there are a lot of great solutions that record the
users screen with
I use Morae for all observation testing in a lab-like setting. It has
three components - Recorder, Observer, and Manager; you can buy each
individually. Recorder is installed on the participant machine and not
only records screen video and any audio, it also allows you to deliver
a survey
We've completely removed Morea from our testing environment for a
number of reasons:
* Doesn't work on Mac (we test both Mac/Windows and need a solution
that will work on both)
* Proprietary video format that can only be edited in their video editor
* Video editor — have you tried to use this
On Jul 29, 2008, at 8:55 PM, Mary Deaton wrote:
I have been using Morae for over two years and have never had any of
the problems you report with patches or video corruption. It is not
necessary to edit video in Morae, you can export it and edit in
anything you want. However, you lose the
I haven't used Silverback yet - and as a Mac user it would certainly
simplify things. I do see a big limitation for remote testing - only Mac
users (with the proper setup) can be recruited for testing. That will (in
most cases) significantly decrease your pool of participants.
I have used
10 matches
Mail list logo
