On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Sam Hague wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Tom Pantelis
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Sam Hague wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Tom Pantelis
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Sam Hague wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Tom Pantelis
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Sam Hague wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Sam Hague
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Tom Pantelis wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Sam Hague wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Sam Hague wrote:
>>
>>> What is the preferred or suggested best practice for
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Jamie G. wrote:
> You could always use Blueprint with Config Management; you're able to
> set default values in BP, than override via config file.
>
> ex:
>
> http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0;
>
You could always use Blueprint with Config Management; you're able to
set default values in BP, than override via config file.
ex:
http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0;
xmlns:cm="http://aries.apache.org/blueprint/xmlns/blueprint-cm/v1.1.0;>
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Sam Hague wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Sam Hague wrote:
>
>> What is the preferred or suggested best practice for service level
>> configuration? There are two methods we have been using and would like to
>>
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Sam Hague wrote:
> What is the preferred or suggested best practice for service level
> configuration? There are two methods we have been using and would like to
> know the pros and cons of each. Genius and NetVirt went with the blueprint
> xmls