Having [OSGeo-Discuss] in the subject field also helps with *visual* filtering.
For those of us who have 1 folder for all the listserv they are on (geo and
non-geo). Or, for emails that get fwd to non-listserv colleagues.
Dave
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024, at 08:58, Jody Garnett via Discuss wrote:
Thanks folks, and thanks to Sandro and system admin team for managing all
this stuff.
I know from my own experience (website reboot) that by the time a change is
shared with disc...@osgoe.org list that the topic is already well underway;
and it is hard to slow down and introduce the change to the
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 10:06:11AM -0500, Daniel Morissette wrote:
> On 2024-01-12 08:05, Jeroen Ticheler wrote:
> > Hi Sandro and others,
> > My suggestion would be to re-instate the old configuration and first
> > propose and discuss a possible update. Such discussion and eventual
> > update shou
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 02:37:26PM +, Luís Moreira de Sousa wrote:
> Please read below, in addition to my questions, I note that with the new
> setup my e-mail application no longer replies automatically to the list.
I went looking at the mails before the change also had Reply-To: real
author
[ Adding discuss list back as I think this is of general interest )
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 02:34:52PM +, Luís Moreira de Sousa wrote:
> Dear Sandro,
>
> I am not qualified to opine on the DKIM configuration, but I would question
> the removal of the prefix. All other pipermail list I am sub
I second Jeroen's thoughts and suggestion.
Daniel
On 2024-01-12 08:05, Jeroen Ticheler wrote:
Hi Sandro and others,
My suggestion would be to re-instate the old configuration and first
propose and discuss a possible update. Such discussion and eventual
update should be announced first before
Please read below, in addition to my questions, I note that with the new setup
my e-mail application no longer replies automatically to the list.
Thank you.
--
Luís
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Forwarded Message ---
From: Luís Moreira de Sousa
Date: On Friday, 12 January
Hi Sandro and others,
My suggestion would be to re-instate the old configuration and first propose
and discuss a possible update. Such discussion and eventual update should be
announced first before it is applied. The Discuss mailing list, as other lists,
has always worked well for me too. The h
I am all for opening up the conversation and adding additional
interfaces to participate, but pleas without messing up or breaking the
existing discussion channels.
Am 01.01.24 um 16:28 schrieb Sandro Santilli via Discuss:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 04:16:03PM +, Cannata Massimiliano via Dis
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 09:35:30AM +0100, Christian Willmes wrote:
> As far as I understood it, the mailing list will continue to work as is in
> the future? And discourse is only a mirror or an additional interface for
> those who prefer to communicate via this app?
This change has nothing to do
I notice, that the discuss list is *not* working as it was before.
Please re-add the [OSGeo-Discuss] prefix to the subject, you are messing
with my filter configuration and I dislike this (very much).
Thank you for your service on the SAC but please can we at least have a
formal vote on such
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:32:06PM +0100, Javier Jimenez Shaw wrote:
> Hi Sandro
>
> It is surprising, but this is the first email from "discuss" that Gmail is
> suggesting it could be spam. It says
>
> "Be careful with this message
> The sender hasn't authenticated this message, so Gmail can't v
As far as I understood it, the mailing list will continue to work as is
in the future? And discourse is only a mirror or an additional interface
for those who prefer to communicate via this app?
I will not use the discourse app, if this mailing list stops its
service, I am out of the conversat
Well said Florian,
I won’t be far behind you.
…and we wonder why user engagement on the lists has dropped off.
I have made some great friends within the OSGeo community over the years. Best
wishes to you all.
I’ll be decommissioning this email address in the near future. If you’d like
to sta
I'm unsubscribing in protest of those changes.
I was hoping that this proposal would be objected by more active
community members, but as a mere lurker it is not worth it for me to
engage in lengthy discussions, if the people in charge decide to break
decodes-long established UX conventions on
15 matches
Mail list logo
