[OSGeo-Discuss] Welcome OSGeo and its members to the Geospatial World Forum (from 13-16 May 2024, in Rotterdam, the Netherlands).

Dear all, I recently had a meeting with the organisers of the Geospatial World Forum conference in May this year in Rotterdam - The Netherlands. The following opportunity has been offered by GWF for OSGeo members for which I will act as intermediary.  >From GWF: Open source is an

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Planet

Thanks for taking care Jorge! On Fri, 08 Mar 2024 15:38:15 +0100 Jorge Sanz via Discuss wrote --- Hello everyone!  This message is a friendly reminder that OSGeo maintains a blog aggregator for community members who write about Geospatial and Open Source topics.

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Email filtering (was: Change in mailing list configuration)

Hi Sandro, First of all, thanks for taking such great care, restoring the default list behaviour and taking time to discuss with a wider audience!  Second, my personal experience with filtering based on header content is completely new. What you describe makes sense, but at the same time it

[OSGeo-Discuss] Bolsena code sprint 13-23 June 2022 - 5 places left and cost reduced due to our sponsors

Hi OSGeo developers, Our last code sprint in Bolsena - Italy was in 2019. And this year we are back! The code sprint will cover an extended period of 10 days, giving all that participate a chance to work and meet a little bit longer. You, developers of OSGeo software projects, can still

[OSGeo-Discuss] Bolsena code sprint 2022 - call for interest

Hi OSGeo developers, Our last code sprint in Bolsena - Italy was in 2019. And this year we are back! The code sprint is planned for an extended period of 10 days, giving all that participate a chance to work and meet a little bit longer. This email is intended to investigate interest from you,

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Conf] Poll: Change FOSS4G structure to have some continuity of organization and management

Hi Maxi, Thanks! I completely agree with those type of changes indeed. It makes sense we have a list of scenario’s forward and have a vote on that by the community. For what the membership of the conference committee is concerned, I left simply because of the supposed/imposed barrier of not

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [OSGeo-Conf] Poll: Change FOSS4G structure to have some continuity of organization and management

Hi Maxi, Thanks for sharing your view on this. Although I sympathize with the idea of a whole community having a say in how conference locations is selected and organized, I’m not in favor of the process you propose. Reading LOI’s and full proposals takes a lot of time and voting a lot of

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Conference selection transparency (Was Announcement: Call for Location global FOSS4G 2023)

My philosophy is and hopefully will always be that we have trust in the committee members that do the voting. They all put in their time and more importantly their heart. Whatever method you come up with, bias and personal preferences come into play. I trust in the people/members + the

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Announcement: Call for Location global FOSS4G 2023

+1 Very well said Mark! Jeroen (fellow idiot) > Op 13 jan. 2022 om 03:14 heeft Mark Iliffe via Discuss > het volgende geschreven: > >  > Hi Everyone, > > I would like to start this email with the caveat, statement, and admission > that "I am an idiot" to ensure all are provided with the