Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Funding code Sprints

> On Feb 22, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) > wrote: > > For my two-pence, which won't even get you a cup of chai in Mumbai Correct. The current going rate is about 15¢ or 10p. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Notice] Email List Maintenance

> On Oct 7, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Alex M wrote: > > All of OSGeo email lists and aliases, will be migrated > to the new "osgeo6" Was kinda expecting the new machine to be called the FOSS4G6 machine… phew ! ___ Discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Renaming FOSS4G

A resounding YES !!! > On Oct 6, 2015, at 5:12 PM, Barry Rowlingson > wrote: > > Okay, this is probably sticking a match under a pile of dry wood but > here goes... > > Can we rename The FOSS4G Conference to The OSGeo Conference? > > Cons: > > 1. FOSS4G is an

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Renaming FOSS4G

> On Oct 6, 2015, at 11:11 PM, Paragon Corporation wrote: > > OSGEO is the Go To for all your FOSS4G needs. Reminds me how I used to do GIS on my IBM then go home and watch CBS on my VCR. Thankfully, those days are over. ___ Discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Board election: no re-elections this year?

> On Sep 23, 2015, at 9:17 AM, Gert-Jan van der Weijden > wrote: > > - Is the board membership such a demanding job that members always resign > after 2 years? I didn’t realize there was no term-limit. In fact, I believe there *should* be one to get new ideas, new

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Discuss Digest, Vol 103, Issue 20

Hello all, hi Jonathan, On Jul 27, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Jonathan Moules j.mou...@hrwallingford.com wrote: These systems may fail from a GIS perspective, but that's because their primary design goal is ease-of-use by the general public. Ease-of-use from the POV of the general public

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Proposed process for selecting OSGeo charter members

On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:08 PM, Howard Butler how...@hobu.co wrote: Do you lose a significant benefit by not being a Charter Member? Just the ability to vote for the board and the ability to tout your exclusivity on a vita/resume. Anything else? Lack of membership does not prevent anyone

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Maps and the Geospatial Revolution from Jul 17th 2013 at Coursera

Snipped a bunch of the email below for brevity -- On Sep 4, 2013, at 6:18 AM, Suchith Anand suchith.an...@nottingham.ac.uk wrote: .. It will be very helpful, if you can share your ideas and experiences to OSGeo Edu community so we can think of ideas for MOOC program entirely using OSGeo

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G 2013 Nottingham update

On Oct 1, 2012, at 8:26 AM, Barry Rowlingson b.rowling...@lancaster.ac.uk wrote: social trips (caves anyone? http://bldgblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/caves-of-nottingham_11.html), Even though Kimbereley is no more, how 'bout ye olde trip to jerusalem? http://www.triptojerusalem.com/ --

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G presentation review process

On Oct 1, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Barry Rowlingson b.rowling...@lancaster.ac.uk wrote: * some names are big draws, and it would be disappointing to not have someone because their abstract wasn't that exciting. If they don't have anything interesting to say, they should not be big draws.

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open Source Geospatial Atlas

On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Seven (aka Arnulf) se...@arnulf.us wrote: Btw: OdbL will be a great enabler for this because it requires to maintain this breadcrumb track when publishing the results. Confused as to how ODbL (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/) is relevant here. Unless,

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Geodata] Open Source Geospatial Atlas

On Jul 31, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Seven (aka Arnulf) se...@arnulf.us wrote: On 07/31/2012 02:14 PM, Mr. Puneet Kishor wrote: On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Seven (aka Arnulf) se...@arnulf.us wrote: Btw: OdbL will be a great enabler for this because it requires to maintain this breadcrumb

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open Source Geospatial Atlas

On Jul 29, 2012, at 9:43 PM, Andrew Turner ajtur...@highearthorbit.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Dimitris Kotzinos kotz...@csd.uoc.gr wrote: Dear all, I would like to second Arnulf's suggestions for the committee and the white paper. Slight amendment : let's name it Open

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open Source Geospatial Atlas

On Jul 28, 2012, at 7:33 AM, Barry Rowlingson b.rowling...@lancaster.ac.uk wrote: Do you think an atlas of beautiful maps produced with open-source technology (software and data) could be made? Here's what I was thinking: .. Great idea, but a physical book in today's day and age?

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The importance of a project's license

On Jul 27, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Andrew Ross andrew.r...@eclipse.org wrote: BSD, MIT, Apache wouldn't have this issue - at the expense of not having the weak copyleft. Basically people can take the code and do what they wish with it. +1 -- Puneet Kishor

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The importance of a project's license

On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Seven (aka Arnulf) se...@arnulf.us wrote: On 07/27/2012 11:45 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: On 27 July 2012 05:55, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote: This is a really interesting debate. Reading the links provided it also appears to be a mixed bag about

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The importance of a project's license

On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Landon Blake sunburned.surve...@gmail.com wrote: I think there is a tradeoff in the licensing decision between the greater adoption that comes with a weaker license, and the stricter adherence to open source principles that come with a stronger license.

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The importance of a project's license

On Jul 27, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Ian Turton ijtur...@gmail.com wrote: On 27 July 2012 15:50, Mr. Puneet Kishor punk.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Landon Blake sunburned.surve...@gmail.com wrote: I think there is a tradeoff in the licensing decision between

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The importance of a project's license

On Jul 27, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Michael P. Gerlek m...@flaxen.com wrote: I hesitate to get into this discussion, but... Puneet wrote: [...] I short-circuit all license discussions in my personal domain by not having any license. Life is too short and precious, in my view, to encumber with

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] The importance of a project's license

On Jul 27, 2012, at 2:39 PM, doug_newc...@fws.gov wrote: I would have to echo that. I do not see using code at work that does not have any licensing information attached. Agreed. -- Puneet Kishor ___ Discuss mailing list

Re: [Board] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Defining an OSGeo Ambassador role

I second Michael's sentiments. Use of terms such as distinguished and elite in the context of OSGeo community makes me extremely uncomfortable. On May 5, 2012, at 2:15 PM, Michael P. Gerlek wrote: Your points have actually been discussed, but so far there hasn't apparently been enough

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: FOSS4G South America

On Feb 13, 2012, at 1:20 PM, slesage wrote: El 2012-02-12 22:25, Alex Borrell escribió: Thanks for your nice reply, Sylvain. I would certainly like to Bolivia (People say it's beatiful). Anyway, if there is something I coul do to help, count on it! Probably we'll see the day of a Latin

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Report from the OSGeo Board meeting

On Sep 21, 2011, at 2:59 AM, Michael P. Gerlek wrote: I wrote recently that there three kinds of functions needed here: administrative (bookkeeping, answering mail, etc), tactical (project management, sys admin), and strategic (fundraising, outreach). The first can be done by a mixture of

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] designing databases, organizing data formats to work with open source and proprietary GIS

Karsten, On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:12 PM, karsten vennemann wrote: Hi all, in the near future I will have the opportunity to help design databases, decide on data formats (files data) for an international organization that wishes to be able to use both proprietary and open source based

[OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo-ers in Sydney

I am in Sydney till the end of the week. If there are any Sydney OSGeo-ers on this list, I would love to meet up with you and get tips on where to find affordable beer. Puneet.___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Re: [Live-demo] Impacts of OSGeo-Live document license selection on OSGeo

On Jun 19, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Charlie Schweik wrote: On 6/18/2011 7:00 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: Are education institutions allowed to license material they create under CC BY-SA? I don't know if there is a yes or no answer to this or to what degree this has been addressed in academic

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] F4G 2012

On May 9, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Eduardo Kanegae wrote: Hi there, I'll not be able to visit F4G2011 but I´d like to start planning myself for the next year conference. Is there any proposal of places for hosting 2012 conference or am I asking this too early? I believe São Paulo is a top

[OSGeo-Discuss] Workshop on Open Government: Open Data, Open Source and Open Standards

## Workshop on Open Government: Open Data, Open Source and Open Standards You are invited to attend a workshop titled [Open Government: Open Data, Open Source and Open Standards][og] organized jointly by [Dr. Hanif Rahemtulla][hr], Horizon Digital Economy Research and [Puneet Kishor][pk],

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO booth is up at AAG in Seattle

On Apr 12, 2011, at 3:20 PM, karsten vennemann kars...@terragis.net wrote: Hi GIS Folks, the OSGEO booth is set-up at AAG 2011 http://www.aag.org/cs/annualmeeting in Seattle. Please please stop by and chat with us if you are in the areas or attending AGG. We have volunteer staffing

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO booth is up at AAG in Seattle

On Apr 12, 2011, at 3:20 PM, karsten vennemann kars...@terragis.net wrote: Hi GIS Folks, the OSGEO booth is set-up at AAG 2011 http://www.aag.org/cs/annualmeeting in Seattle. Please please stop by and chat with us if you are in the areas or attending AGG. We have volunteer staffing at

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Finding position based on horizon profile?

On Mar 29, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Ian Turton wrote: On 28 March 2011 16:48, Michael P. Gerlek m...@flaxen.com wrote: Consider the following hypothetical problem: Assume we have a good elevation data set for a large region of the earth -- say, an entire mountain range. Now let's say we have a