I would also urge OSGeo to try to get third-party input (e.g., GIS
Geography[5], folks from some of the GIS curriculum bodies) into the
evaluation/maintenance process to inhibit (to paraphrase) unduly preferring the
taste of our own koolaid.
FWIW, Tom Roche <tom_ro...@pobox.com>
[1]:
rcGIS triumph?
> Where does QGIS have an edge?
IMHO we/OSGeo/FOSS4G should be using these sorts of documents as a guide toward
managing/investing development and marketing efforts; YMMV.
HTH, Tom Roche <tom_ro...@pobox.com>
[1]: https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2016-May/016
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:03:19 +
From: "Neil Chue Hong (SSI)"
Subject: [Discuss] Recruiting Associate Editors for the Journal of Open
Research Software
> The Journal of Open Research Software is an international, open-access,
> peer-reviewed journal that
Location=RTP, just south of Durham, NC. Search closes T 16 Feb 2016. Much more
at following link.
https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/428985700 (rearranged, excerpted)
> DUTIES:
> Facilitate and collaborate educational programs; serves on scientific task
> forces, committees, and
I'm guessing this has been previously discussed, but JIC, here's yet another
item for the todo list:
We should try to present open-GIS alternatives @ GIS Day[1] events. Esp
academic ones like this[2].
apologies if this has been previously discussed-to-death, Tom Roche
<tom_ro...@pobox.
, IIUC,
the latter is the most active).
FWIW, Tom Roche tom_ro...@pobox.com
[1]: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/
[2]: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-June/014403.html
[3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_system
[4]: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianGis
[5]: http
Tom Roche Fri, 29 May 2015 18:37:09 -0400[0]
Nature Physics commentary [Hey and Payne 2015[1]] claiming that ''[one] of
the first scientists to recognize the need for reproducibility in
computational science was the geophysicist Jon Claerbout. As early as 1990,
he set a goal
and useful.
TIA, Tom Roche tom_ro...@pobox.com
[1]: http://go.nature.com/FMw34h
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_Exploration_Project
[3]: http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v11/n5/pdf/nphys3313.pdf
(unfortunately it does not seem to have a DOI)
[4]: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss
? Then the community could start
contributing and commenting at those locations (possibly augmented by
project-specific maillists[2]).
HTH, Tom Roche tom_ro...@pobox.com
[1]: For a more comprehensive list than given above, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
. (The more important question here should probably be, why would anyone care
that one humanoid seems to be privileged over the others ?-) Perhaps make the
green humanoid brown, and leave the globe green.
FWIW, Tom Roche tom_ro...@pobox.com
___
Discuss mailing
10 matches
Mail list logo