Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Marketing] Call for Papers for FOSS4G 2013 Academic Track

2013-01-23 Thread Massimiliano Cannata
Dear Dr. Beher, apologize me for this question, but it is not clear to me if at this stage you are asking to submit an abstract for evaluation or a full paper for evaluation. In last years, generally I submitted an abstract, then if selected for presentation in academic track I where asked for a

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Marketing] Call for Papers for FOSS4G 2013 Academic Track

2013-01-23 Thread Barry Rowlingson
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Massimiliano Cannata massimiliano.cann...@supsi.ch wrote: Dear Dr. Beher, apologize me for this question, but it is not clear to me if at this stage you are asking to submit an abstract for evaluation or a full paper for evaluation. In last years, generally I

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Marketing] Call for Papers for FOSS4G 2013 Academic Track

2013-01-23 Thread Dr. Franz-Josef Behr
Thanks for the discussion, and I can imagine that there might be a risk involved if somebody decides to make a submission. But that's the way reviewed contributions are going to be published. 7 months before the conference is not early, if we are lucke, we can handle the review, selection,

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Marketing] Call for Papers for FOSS4G 2013 Academic Track

2013-01-23 Thread Venkatesh Raghavan
On 2013/01/23 18:49, Massimiliano Cannata wrote: From the web page: We invite academics and researchers to submit full papers in English, of maximum 6,000 words, before the deadline of 1 February 2013. Templates for submissions in a variety of formats can be found here, and detailed