On 24/09/13 05:35, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 23/09/2013 20:46, Cameron Shorter ha scritto:
From what I can gather from the outside, it seems osgeo4w's primary
requirement is a
1+ dedicated developer(s) who will drive the core functions of the
I agree that with some love, OSGeo4W has the potential to be an
excellent asset to the OSGeo community.
It also shares many synergies with OSGeo-Live, and I could see many
opportunities for the two projects to benefit each other.
For instance, the OSGeo-Live Project Overviews could be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 23/09/2013 20:46, Cameron Shorter ha scritto:
From what I can gather from the outside, it seems osgeo4w's primary
requirement is a
1+ dedicated developer(s) who will drive the core functions of the project.
Namely,
setting a release
On 23 September 2013 20:35, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
what we mainly need IMHO is a clear direction, and
therefore a mechanism to take decisions (e.g. the approach from Tamas is quite
interesting, and different from the current one; Mateusz has suggested an
alternative
2013/9/23 Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net
Although I suggested CoApp route as I think it's the right modern way
to package FOSS for Windows,
I don't think I will be able to get actively involved in this project I'm
afraid
(I'm no longer able to target Windows with my volunteered
On 23 September 2013 22:49, Tamas Szekeres szeker...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/9/23 Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net
Although I suggested CoApp route as I think it's the right modern way
to package FOSS for Windows,
I don't think I will be able to get actively involved in this project I'm
Some of us use OSGEO4W just because we have to, Windows is still, by far,
the most widely used OS in the world. I think it's a great idea to give it
some more attention, especially to the new experimental 64-bit version.
I would be glad to contribute in any manner possible, but I need to learn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
OSGEO4W is a crucial piece of our infrastructure, and is one of the
main services we are giving for the spread of GFOSS.
I think it does not get the attention it deserves. The active
developer team is very small, many packages are obsolete,
2013/9/20 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it
I suggest to make a Steering Committee
for OSGEO4W, so to have a clear roadmap, and give Windows (urgh!)
users a predictable environment. I think some of our million users
would be happy to support this effort, if they would know they
On 09/20/2013 02:45 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
2013/9/20 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it
I suggest to make a Steering Committee
for OSGEO4W, so to have a clear roadmap, and give Windows (urgh!)
users a predictable environment. I think some of our million users
would be happy to support
Paolo,
As you know I am in support of establishing a PSC for the OSGeo4W project,
and would be pleased to participate. I would encourage you to email
osgeo4w-dev and lets get this under way.
(unable to sleep at 3am in Notthingham)
Best regards,
Frank
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Paolo
Done, thanks. Glad to see things are moving.
I think before tackling the tech issues, we have a problem with
governance here: once we have a PSC, we can go on deciding the way to
go. Before that, we risk having discussions, duplications, and few
packages.
Glad to see we have a good response
12 matches
Mail list logo
