From: Jody Garnett [jody.garn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 6:36 PM
To: Suchith Anand
Cc: Darrell Fuhriman; OSGeo Discussions; mvloem...@boundlessgeo.com
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Question(s) for board candidates
Hi Jody,
Thank you for your
Hi Jody,
> Thank you for your insightful inputs. I would like to also use this
> opportunity to invite Industry like Boundless team who are committed to
> OSGeo ideals be more actively involved in Geo4All as Industry partner for
> rapidly expanding opportunities.
>
Using my personal email here,
-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] on
behalf of Jody Garnett [jody.garn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 9:26 PM
To: Darrell Fuhriman
Cc: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Question(s) for board candidates
Great set of open ended questions Darrell, and difficult to answer
-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] on
behalf of Jody Garnett [jody.garn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 9:26 PM
To: Darrell Fuhriman
Cc: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Question(s) for board candidates
Great set of open ended questions Darrell, and difficult to answer
vrijdag 25 september 2015 17:13
> Aan: dirk.fri...@geosparc.com
> CC: discuss@lists.osgeo.org; managementsupp...@geosparc.com
> Onderwerp: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Question(s) for board candidates
>
> Dirk:
>
> Thanks for taking time to answer the questions. If I could follow-up
-boxes...
>>
>>
>> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
>> Van: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
>> discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] Namens Michael Gerlek
>> Verzonden: vrijdag 25 september 2015 17:13
>> Aan: dirk.fri...@geosparc.com
>> CC: discuss@l
jk bericht-
Van: discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org]
Namens Michael Gerlek
Verzonden: vrijdag 25 september 2015 17:13
Aan: dirk.fri...@geosparc.com
CC: discuss@lists.osgeo.org; managementsupp...@geosparc.com
Onderwerp: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Question(s) for board
For the record, the OSGeo Board was not involved in the FOSS4G video
debate (most of those 47 messages were at the OSGeo Conference Committee
level, where they should happen); I saw that and quickly motioned to the
Board to approve, so the Conference Committee can move on. The board
quickly
Great set of open ended questions Darrell, and difficult to answer as there
is a gap between what OSGeo is in position to do as a volunteer
driven organization and all the opportunities available in our industry. Since
OSGeo is a transparent organization we all had a ring side seat for the
decline
Dear Darrel,
On 21-09-15 20:03, Darrell Fuhriman wrote:
> I have a set of inter-related questions for board candidates.
>
> 1) What do you see as OSGeo’s purpose today?
OSGeo should promote the rights for free software, from a geo
perspective. Data and standards from the other points of the
Dirk:
Thanks for taking time to answer the questions. If I could follow-up, though,
more details would be helpful. (I don’t mean to pick on you personally, I’m
just trying to get a better feel for what sorts of specific ideas you and the
other candidates might have.)
>> 2) What do you see as
Dear Darrell,
Here are my answers to your questions.
1) What do you see as OSGeo’s purpose today?
-> Promoting FOSS4G spirit world wide.
1a) What is OSGeo doing today that it shouldn’t be doing?
-> Giving too much organising burden to FOSS4G LOC. Eventually much burden to
LOC will damage
I have a set of inter-related questions for board candidates.
1) What do you see as OSGeo’s purpose today?
1a) What is OSGeo doing today that it shouldn’t be doing?
2) What do you see as OSGeo’s purpose in five years?
2a) What should OSGeo be doing in five years that it *isn’t* doing today?
3)
13 matches
Mail list logo
