GIS?
Bruce
> From: Discuss <discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Tom Roche
> <tom_ro...@pobox.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 May 2016 9:17 AM
> To: discuss@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Recent comparison of desktop GIS and image
> pro
Bruce Bannerman [1]
>> Your spreadsheet[2] comparison shows a lot of potential, but I can see that
>> will take a lot of effort to keep it current.
Markus Neteler[3]
> to my knowledge the effort is stalled. In my view the maintenance of this
> table is a perfect task for OSGeo :-)
+1. I
Hi Bruce,
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Bruce Bannerman
wrote:
> @Markus,
>
> Your spreadsheet comparison shows a lot of potential, but I can see that it
> will take a lot of effort to keep it current.
>
> Is this something that projects are doing currently?
Hi Paolo, Markus, Tom and Till,
You have provided some good links there that will be sufficient for my
immediate need.
Many thanks for your help.
@Markus,
Your spreadsheet comparison shows a lot of potential, but I can see that it
will take a lot of effort to keep it current.
Is this
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
> previous attempts proved difficult, as a proper comparison involves a
> lot of work. The ESRI document seems a good starting point. Unsure we
> would be allowed to reuse it.
> Would you be willing to help
till.ad...@fossgis.de [1]
> http://gisgeography.com/qgis-arcgis-differences/
Thanks for that: quite a detailed comparison of ArcGIS and QGIS, at least, and
also has some interesting comments and pointers to books. This particular
document is also archiveable, so I saved the most recent
already some days ago, but here is at least a comparison between AG and
QG:
http://gisgeography.com/qgis-arcgis-differences/
Till
Am 2016-05-13 08:08, schrieb Paolo Cavallini:
Il 12/05/2016 23:57, Bruce Bannerman ha scritto:
Has anyone done a recent comparison of desktop GIS and image
Il 12/05/2016 23:57, Bruce Bannerman ha scritto:
> Has anyone done a recent comparison of desktop GIS and image processing
> capability?
>
> It would be interesting to see where we stand now with FOSS4G software
> functionality.
>
> It appears that this is what ESRI is using to compare the
Has anyone done a recent comparison of desktop GIS and image processing
capability?
It would be interesting to see where we stand now with FOSS4G software
functionality.
It appears that this is what ESRI is using to compare the functionality of
their various license levels: