On 22/4/17 8:45 am, Jody Garnett wrote:
2. In/exclude projects
Given the fact that OSGeo Live serves as an introduction, I think
the libraries are far less important to include.
I think the libraries are in use by the other applications (example
GeoTools, GDAL/OGR). Having some
> 2. In/exclude projects
> Given the fact that OSGeo Live serves as an introduction, I think the
> libraries are far less important to include.
>
I think the libraries are in use by the other applications (example
GeoTools, GDAL/OGR). Having some documentation about the libraries does no
harm.
ss; geofor...@lists.osgeo.org
Onderwerp: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Reducing scope of OSGeo-Live for next 11.0
release
From a education/training perspective i think lowering the release frequency
of OSGeo Live to a yearly base will be helpful esp. if we are planning to
build educational materials to link
.
Best wishes,
Suchith
From: Discuss <discuss-boun...@lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Gert-Jan van der
Weijden (OSGeo.nl) <gert-...@osgeo.nl>
Sent: 18 April 2017 4:39 PM
To: Astrid Emde (OSGeo); Discuss
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Reducing scope o
Hi OSGeo-Live team and others,
1. Frequency
In order to reduce the workload one might consider to lower the release
frequency to a yearly base.
(In which case I'd also suggest to name the version after their year of
release: "OSGeo Live 2017" etc..)
For my purposes it doesn't add much value
Reducing scope of OSGeo-Live for next 11.0 release
18 April 2017
For our next OSGeo-Live release, 11.0, we propose to reduce the number
of packages included, and only support a 64 bit distribution, (32 bit
will be built but not tested or officially supported).
Factors leading to this
