Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

Hi Jeff, many thanks for undoing, and for the clarification. This was exactly what I was asking for, nothing else. As Bruce stated, I highly value you personally as well as your relentless work for and with OSGeo to steer the tall ship, and by no means I was implying malice. I was somewhat upset

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

Hi Cameron, thank you for confirming the appropriateness of requesting a correction. To me this is a serious issue of conduct - unless CoC exclusively has been established to persecute gender issues, in which case (i) CoC should be renamed and (ii) a general conduct observing any other conduct

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

Hi Jeff, no problem: on the OpenHub page for rasdaman, OSGeo is listed as owner. This is misinformation, owner is rasdaman GmbH. You are right, this upsets me, and I am requesting that OSGeo restores the real owner immediately. -Peter On 2015-09-17 22:56, Jeff McKenna wrote: > Hi Peter, > >

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

hm, if this is not a case of conduct violation, in this case in the name of OSGeo and hence harming the reputation of the whole organization, then I cannot see what else qualifies. -Peter On 2015-09-17 23:17, Camille Acey wrote: > I am having a hard time seeing how this is a CoC matter. > Camille

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

Hi Peter, Please understand that OSGeo is having its big annual conference FOSS4G in Seoul now, and that you sent all this right before the big final day (lots going on). I note that you chose to send this to the entire community, and not tell and ask me directly, since, just now you sent me

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

Hi Peter, Could I request that you please take a deep breath and then temper your language before posting again. It appears you feel quite offended that ownership of rasdaman has been incorrectly assigned to OSGeo. That is understandable. I've personally taken offense to your suggestions of

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

I agree: Peter’s issue doesn’t seem to be a Code of Conduct issue, it seems closer to a Code of Ethics issue — but even that’s not quite right. I think this is more properly a grievance to be taken up directly with the Board. Suggestion: the CoC team right want to consider a couple lines on the

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

Ok, maybe I don't understand, but why doesn't somebody just fix this issue. It seems everyone agrees the listing is wrong on the site. Somebody should have a cease and desist letter sent to the site to change the owner to the correct name or remove the posting. whois openhub.net for the site

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

hm, this is not my current interest, but I observe in passing that the term "code of conduct" in OSGeo appears ...let's say... used by some people with very focused interests. But as said, my concern gets first, and to me it is secondary who acts as long as somebody acts :) -Peter On 2015-09-18

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

so first OSGeo steals a project identity and then just says "go cure yourself"? That won't fly. -Peter On 2015-09-18 17:30, Markus Neteler wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Stephen Woodbridge > wrote: >> Ok, maybe I don't understand, but why doesn't somebody

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

I am baffled how easy this incident is taken. I cannot believe that OSGeo takes responsibility and professional behavior so lightly - after all, an organization fraudulently usurpates a project for improving its external. Compare this to the rave and concerns over open LIDAR formats. What I want

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

just to clarify: it is a _very_ simple step: OSGeo needs to login to OpenHub (obviously they have one, otherwise this false claim could not have been established) to undo that claim. That simple. So, when will OSGeo do that? -Peter On 2015-09-18 17:02, Stephen Woodbridge wrote: > Ok, maybe I

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

Give the guy his project back and be done with it. That way all of us can go along our separate ways unfettered by each other. -- Puneet Kishor > On Sep 18, 2015, at 6:41 PM, Peter Baumann > wrote: > > just to clarify: it is a _very_ simple step: OSGeo needs

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Stephen Woodbridge wrote: > Ok, maybe I don't understand, but why doesn't somebody just fix this issue. > It seems everyone agrees the listing is wrong on the site. Somebody should ... just check the page itself:

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

This might just be an accidental bit of confusion. At some point the Marketing and Outreach committee did want to make sure that all OSGeo projects had listings on OpenHub because we pull these stats into OSGeo-Live and other materials. We also wanted all OSGeo projects to show up if someone

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

Looks like Jeff or Mateusz needs to login (the designated managers on openhub), and go to https://www.openhub.net/orgs/OSGeo/manage_projects then remove Rasdaman from OSGeo projects. Am I correct in understanding that is what you are requesting? I can't see anything on OpenHub that allows

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

Peter, If you are unable to explain your conduct issue in detail (since you mention the issue is one single person), you can take this to the Code of Conduct Committee (possibly privately at coc-private-ow...@lists.osgeo.org or publicly at

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

Hi Peter, It may be early here at FOSS4G-Seoul, but I am finding it hard to understand your full issue. Can you please explain here to everyone what you mean by "I found that OSGeo has claimed rasdaman at some time in the past". Claimed how/where/in what way? As far as I know, rasdaman is

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

Hi Peter, I think your request to have ownership of Rasdaman "corrected" to be owned by GmbH is reasonable, especially since the license of code I assume shows reference to GmbH? I also assume this could be confirmed if someone were to check the lineage of code commits? I'd hope that this

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

I am having a hard time seeing how this is a CoC matter. Camille On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote: > Hi Peter, > > It may be early here at FOSS4G-Seoul, but I am finding it hard to > understand your full issue. Can you please explain here to