Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Status of discussion regarding FOSS4G collaboration with LocationTech and POCs

2014-10-02 Thread Cameron Shorter
I encourage all with an opinion on these topics, and especially those on the conference committee and board to add their votes and reasoning against the 6 options. Gauging opinions will of our community should be helpful for a board when making decisions. Add your opinions here:

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Status of discussion regarding FOSS4G collaboration with LocationTech and POCs

2014-10-01 Thread Jachym Cepicky
I'm, about to port the survey into different survey system to me, (and I already said it), the discussion is not about to locationtech or not to locationtech, but about osgeo itself, what do we want, how do we want it, therefore the survey just my 0.02 Jachym 2014-10-01 18:04 GMT+02:00

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Status of discussion regarding FOSS4G collaboration with LocationTech and POCs

2014-10-01 Thread Jeff McKenna
Hi Gert-Jan, A lot of good topics have been brought up in the last few weeks, and a lot of discussions have occurred, as you mentioned. I feel the whole community recently 'took a breath' about all this. Which of course was needed. I wish I have all the answers for you, but I don't; to be

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Status of discussion regarding FOSS4G collaboration with LocationTech and POCs

2014-10-01 Thread Jody Garnett
The discussion seems to be over. However 2 monuments of this discussion remain 1. A wiki page at http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference_Options_2014 (assembled by Cameron Shorter) 2. A google doc based survey (by Jacky Cepicky) Can someone explain to me (and others) what a) the current