Hmmm,
Very thoughtful reply. :c)
I wasn't trying to incite a riot or anything, it just seemed a bit vague
on the press release page about what was appropriate (or not).
bobb
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Bob Basques wrote:
Whoa,
So a press release can only be passed through for an existing OS
Bob Basques wrote:
Whoa,
So a press release can only be passed through for an existing OSGEO
project? What good is that to the wider community?
Or should there be another example added to the "Conception" section of
the "press Release" page?
That part on the bottom about costs for distrib
Allan Doyle wrote:
+1 on no "advertising" or "announcements" on this list. I agree that it
may sound churlish to stop good organizations from sending good
information to good people; I also agree that allowing it would diminish
the usefulness of this list. If the web page of offerings is not en
Mike Adair wrote:
I'd like to follow up on a conversation that took place at FOSS4G in
Victoria regarding a gathering of the open source projection clan under
the OSGeo umbrella. Frank can probably expand on the idea more, but the
idea being that it would be an opportunity to build up a commun
Mike Adair wrote:
I'd like to follow up on a conversation that took place at FOSS4G in
Victoria regarding a gathering of the open source projection clan under
the OSGeo umbrella. Frank can probably expand on the idea more, but the
idea being that it would be an opportunity to build up a commun
Bob Basques wrote:
Whoa,
So a press release can only be passed through for an existing OSGEO
project? What good is that to the wider community?
I think that OSGeo press release are an official thing so we need to pass it
through somewhere before publishing. Do you think we should not?
Wa
Arnulf Christl wrote:
[snip a bunch of really good stuff - thanks Arnulf]
Does this mean that all businesses providing this kind of service should
now spam this list with their latest announcements?
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo
OSGeo-Announce:
OSGeo Announcements and News
OSGeo-Di
Whoa,
So a press release can only be passed through for an existing OSGEO
project? What good is that to the wider community?
Or should there be another example added to the "Conception" section of
the "press Release" page?
That part on the bottom about costs for distribution is an interest
Another good place to introduce OSGeo to NASA is the ESIP Federation,
where I think a number of OSGeo folks are already active. Their next
meeting is in July in New Hampshire. http://esipfed.org/events (ignore
the date typo, the 2007 there should be 2008...)
Allan
On Jan 18, 2008,
+1 on no "advertising" or "announcements" on this list. I agree that
it may sound churlish to stop good organizations from sending good
information to good people; I also agree that allowing it would
diminish the usefulness of this list. If the web page of offerings is
not enough, then mayb
I'd like to follow up on a conversation that took place at FOSS4G in
Victoria regarding a gathering of the open source projection clan under
the OSGeo umbrella. Frank can probably expand on the idea more, but the
idea being that it would be an opportunity to build up a community
around the var
Greetings -
I'll give the “standard process” for announcing possible OSGeo events
suggested by Arnulf a try. If there is interest I'll create a Proposed
Event Wiki page.
NASA is holding their bi-annual Carbon Cycle and Ecosystem Joint Science
Workshop April 28-May 2 in College Park Maryland:
Le Friday 18 January 2008 14:05:49 Arnulf Christl, vous avez écrit :
> Yves Jacolin wrote:
> > Le jeudi 17 janvier 2008 19:07, Arnulf Christl a écrit :
> >>> I also noticed (ok, so at this point I was going on the hunt for what
> >>> else we might want to revisit) that we have no "media centre" lin
Yves Jacolin wrote:
Le jeudi 17 janvier 2008 19:07, Arnulf Christl a écrit :
I also noticed (ok, so at this point I was going on the hunt for what
else we might want to revisit) that we have no "media centre" links from
the front page. Do we have a place where we put all our press releases?
He
Howard Butler wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
If you were to lead the development of this material and put it into
the Open Source (with your name attached) this would give you extra
credibility and marketing reach.
Why? Why must OTG put their hard earned training
Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) wrote:
On 17-Jan-08, at 11:51 AM, Howard Butler wrote:
I applaud OTG for developing a curriculum and providing training
services to serve this market, and I think the osgeo-discuss is a
perfect place for an announcement like this.
I encouraged them to post here so oth
16 matches
Mail list logo
