Il 17/09/2014 22:42, P Kishor ha scritto:
also in this thread) is like waking up at night to find a bunch of strangers
chatting
in your living room.
Definitely, involving Charter Members would be a very sound and nice thing to
do.
+1
I share Puneet feelings.
All the best.
--
Paolo
+1 for involving charter members
Maria
Prof. Maria Antonia Brovelli
Vice Rector for Como Campus - Politecnico di Milano
ISPRS WG IV/5 Web and Cloud Based Geospatial Services and Applications -
Co-chair - OSGeo Charter Member - ICA - OSGeo Advisory Board Member - SIFET
Scientific Commitee
This ' LocationTech and OSGeo collaboration ', appears to be some thing that
the OSGeo Charter should involve and motivate opinion etc. Those at the helm
may pl post a summary of the, 'storey so far'.
On Thursday, September 18, 2014 2:23 AM, Jachym Cepicky
jachym.cepi...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Jachym Cepicky jachym.cepi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just noting,
discussion about relationship between LocationTech and OSGeo is here
since 2012 (IIRC). That many people did not pain attention to it
(actually including myself up to certain time), is
Hello,
well said Gert-Jan.
I would like to say that I feel that the Board is responsible to provide
decision proposals, giving the full meaning / goals of each decision proposed
(this is really important to me to be also more open in this part), clarifying
the proposals may help for better
Dear All
I agree completely with Margherita. The most of people are asking themselves
what it is happening.
Please who was and is involved, please write the history of what has happened
on a wiki page. When the plot is finalised the charter members vote.
Maria
Prof. Maria Antonia Brovelli
Hi all,
sorry for coming so late in this thread but I would like to try rephrase what
Bart said to the following:
On one hand you have a Foundation, let’s name it OSGeo, which is willing to be
more professional at organizing the FOSS4G and searching for the help of a
professional organization
HI all,
As there is a request for Charter Members to chime in, here my 2 cents:
The issue on hand is highlighting excellently the need for effective and
efficient decision procedures based on mandates.
OSGeo has but embarked on establishing these, currently discussions are driven
more by gut
I second Jachym and Peter.
Peter Baumann:
HI all,
As there is a request for Charter Members to chime in, here my 2 cents:
The issue on hand is highlighting excellently the need for effective and
efficient decision procedures based on mandates.
OSGeo has but embarked on establishing these,
Hi,
great mails after FOSS4G. I wish, we had chance to talk about stuff
openly face2face on FOSS4G, but there was no timeslot, nor members
(not so many).
If you agree, I (any help welcomed) volunteer for creating
questionnaire (using google forms) with questions to our charter
members. The
I didn't actually test conference events specifically, and it's only a
correlation (not causation). But it would be easy to if there's a good
list somewhere of events by country (might have to be by region
analysis). And of course as I mentioned in the talk testing local
chapter activity too.
I'll volunteer to start a wiki collating options for the FOSS4G future,
with sections that people can add comments into.
I should have something up for review and contributions within 24 hours.
On 18/09/2014 7:04 PM, Maria Antonia Brovelli wrote:
Dear All
I agree completely with Margherita.
It will be clear to most charter members if some one helps
summarise LocationTech and OSGeo proposed collaboration
Ravi Kumar
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
13 matches
Mail list logo
