Jody Garnett wrote:
Thanks for the link
I am really looking forward to the code sprint; it is going to be very
hard to pick what topics to work on :-D
Heh, may be it won't turn into a huge cherry pie battle ;-)
Cheers
--
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net
Paulo Marcondes wrote:
On another related point, I am always careful with corporate
workshops/lectures/whatever, as they too often tend to be more of the
advertising than the technical type.
There is going to be a demo pit for such things - and hopefully a wide
range of products from all walks
As Jody points out, isn't the OTN Development License only useful for
creating prototypes and doing development?
We grant you a nonexclusive, nontransferable limited license to use the
programs only for the purpose of developing a single prototype of your
application, and not for any other
I am just in favor of Paul supplying free beer...
++
Aaron Racicot - GIS Programmer
360.221.2441 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
++
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Or just say OSI-compliant -- since that's what OSGeo's charter says..?
-mpg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ned Horning
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 12:12 PM
To: 'OSGeo Discussions'
Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Free
Paul
Ned Horning wrote:
Paul Ramsey wrote:
The term free as used by this community is jargon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jargon, plain and simple, completely
transparent to those in-the-know, opaque to outsiders. The workshop
submission is just a clear example of that.
Would dropping Free and
I agree that it is an OSGeo conference and OSGeo promotes free and open
source software. If Oracle can demonstrate how their product
works/integrates with open source geospatial software then I don't have
a problem with that.
-Perry
Jason Birch wrote:
You know, I'd actually be in favour of
