Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Recent comparison of desktop GIS and image processing capability?

2016-05-16 Thread Markus Neteler
Hi Bruce, On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Bruce Bannerman wrote: > @Markus, > > Your spreadsheet comparison shows a lot of potential, but I can see that it > will take a lot of effort to keep it current. > > Is this something that projects are doing currently? to my knowledge the effort is stal

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Recent comparison of desktop GIS and image processing capability?

2016-05-16 Thread Bruce Bannerman
Hi Paolo, Markus, Tom and Till, You have provided some good links there that will be sufficient for my immediate need. Many thanks for your help. @Markus, Your spreadsheet comparison shows a lot of potential, but I can see that it will take a lot of effort to keep it current. Is this somethin

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Tales from a Benevolent Dictator

2016-05-16 Thread Cameron Shorter
Hi Marco, I assert that the incubation checklist is pretty good, but could still be tweaked. The question to ask is: "Is anyone up to the challenge of refining the checklist, and then rallying the incubation community to agree on an improved checklist?" Warm regards, Cameron On 16/05/2016 8

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Tales from a Benevolent Dictator

2016-05-16 Thread Markus Neteler
Hi, concerning Software Quality Assurance Metrics, some notes on the GRASS GIS project on which such software metrics were applied in the past. Here some selected papers which we published on the matter: * Di Penta, M, M. Neteler, G. Antoniol, E. Merlo, 2005: A Language-Independent Software Renov

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Tales from a Benevolent Dictator

2016-05-16 Thread Marco Afonso
Thanks Cameron, CMMI is vast and easily one can get lost on it, losing focus on the pratical side of software that we use daily. In CMMI area of Software Quality Assurance Metrics [1], I found a very limited number of metrics compared to the ones that we can found in here [2] [3], namely reliabil

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Tales from a Benevolent Dictator

2016-05-16 Thread Cameron Shorter
Hi Marco, You have suggested that the OSGeo Incubation Graduation Checklist has zero software quality criteria? I respectfully disagree. It doesn't go down to the detail of "what UI tests exist?" Such criteria are project specific, and different for each project. You might be interested to do

[OSGeo-Discuss] remove from mailing list

2016-05-16 Thread Oshani Singapuliarachchi
remove from mailing list ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] remove from mailing list

2016-05-16 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 16 May 2016 at 10:13, oshanisinga wrote: > Please be kind enough to take me off the mailing list Please, you can do it yourself here https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss At the bottom, follow "To unsubscribe from Discuss, " Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.los

[OSGeo-Discuss] remove from mailing list

2016-05-16 Thread oshanisinga
Please be kind enough to take me off the mailing list  Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss