And mine
http://howardbutler.com/pdal-paris-sprint-recap.html
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>
> Here's mine
>
> http://blog.cleverelephant.ca/2016/03/paris-code-sprint-postgis-recap.html
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>> Taking this out to a sepe
> On Nov 14, 2015, at 5:36 PM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
>
> Hi Helmut,
>
> On Sat, 14. Nov 2015 at 23:18:36 +0100, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
>> Is OSGeo4W orphaned?
>
> No. But it's mostly only getting updates on GRASS (but only 32bit) and QGIS.
> Dependencies are usually only updated if req
> On Mar 3, 2015, at 12:13 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
>
> Hi Cameron,
>
>> It is difficult for OSGeo to stop a vendor from promoting their product,
>> or promoting a specific lock in strategy.
>
> Of course. That was exactly my point.
OSGeo can wag its finger at people and say "drugs are bad" al
On Jun 23, 2014, at 10:13 AM, P Kishor wrote:
> Membership dues for OSGeo could very well work, but they would change the
> nature of the organization.
Yes, that may be true, however it is also true that OSGeo as an organization
has significantly evolved significantly two or three times since
On Jun 23, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
> I’ve not been following this issue closely, so I just went back through the
> old mails and I’m still left with this rather basic question:
>
> What is the problem that we are trying to solve?
OSGeo's membership process is completely ad
On Jun 23, 2014, at 9:25 AM, Bart van den Eijnden wrote:
> Good food for thought Howard, can’t say I disagree with anything you say here.
>
> The only thing we need to consider is that for some countries 50 or 70 USD
> can still be a lot of money
Yes. Something equitable could be arrived at.
On Jun 20, 2014, at 7:38 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> Thanks Paul, Dimitris and Peter for your thoughts.
>
> Comments inline.
>
> On 20/06/2014 4:31 am, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>> http://www.aag.org/cs/membership/individual_membership
>> http://www.aag.org/cs/membership/individual_membership/dues
>
On Oct 31, 2013, at 2:38 AM, andrea antonello
wrote:
> Hi everyone, I hope this is not OT.
> I wanted to ask a short advice on a las file content problem.
>
> I wanted to get a short comment about how GPS Week Time is seen in the
> las format.
>
> Let's assume the las file format is prior to
On Sep 18, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Richard Greenwood
wrote:
> I agree that this is the first year that nominations have been
> publicly discussed and it is a departure from previous years. I
> followed Jeff's lead when I nominated Chris.
>
> But hey, we're an open community, I think it's even in the
> On 2012/07/24, at 13:48, Ravi Kumar wrote:
>
>> Please consider changing the rule that only One vote for one candidate (by
>> the charter member) in the Board election.
>>
>> Advantages:
>> The only way to show that you prefer a candidate is by voting to him / her
>> more than once.
Disadva
;
> On 12-06-28 8:48 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I have the honor to nominate Michael Smith for OSGeo Charter membership.
>>
>> Mike is with the US Army Corps of Engineers, Remote Sensing GIS Center,
>> and has been a longtime supporter of
On Jan 23, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Volker Mische wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as many of you probably know, I was strongly against having a North
> American FOSS4G, as it might draw the attention away from the
> international one, and I vaporise the yearly gathering of the
> (developer) tribe.
I never unders
On Jul 5, 2011, at 7:47 AM, Ari Jolma wrote:
> Folks,
>
> spatialreference.org (which is a great service) reports the proj4 text for
> for example 3067 without the towgs84 parameters when they are all zeros. IMHO
> they should be reported as proj4 nowadays requires them to work correctly.
> T
On Aug 12, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Ari Jolma wrote:
> Landon Blake wrote:
>>
>> I’m just curious, because I didn’t see there names listed on the nominations
>> list.
>>
>
> Landon,
>
> AFAIK, nobody have submitted nominations for me or Howard. On the wiki there
> are four nominations and I've se
On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:17 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> - (sorry if I'm rude, but) are we sure we can't do better to manage a vital
> infrastructure? More than 10 days on a backup server does not sound very good
> to me;
> weren't the blades new?
The support of OSGeo's system infrastructure is a
On Jun 7, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Bob Basques wrote:
> Wouldn't it seem prudent to classify the projects before trying to compare
> them?
/me screams into a room that no one can hear. Stop it!
This whole exercise is quite frankly, masturbatory, and does nothing to help
the projects who would be r
On Jun 1, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Stefan Steiniger wrote:
>> On 06/01/2010 10:00 AM, Daniel Ames wrote:
>>> Do any of you have a preferred open source help authoring tool? We're
>>> looking for something to document our projects on web pages - something
>>> better than wiki - and also to download and
On Jan 3, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Dave Sampson wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> I am wondering what, if any, projects are preparing or planning for a
> move to support python 3.x.
>
> Due to it being a major release I understand it does not come with
> backwards compatibility, however there are some tools ou
On Sep 14, 2009, at 4:01 PM, Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) wrote:
Hi everyone, a recent chat I was asked about our vision for OSGeo over
the next 3 and 5 years. I'd really like to hear thoughts on the
matter
and pool a few of the ideas together for further discussions amongst
committees, projects,
On Jun 19, 2009, at 6:35 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Hi all.
Are there any plans to solve the horrible slowness and tendency to
return errors of the trac? We are working a lot on the qgis trac,
but it
is a real pain, to the point that we are kind of thinking to write an
interface to the trac
On Dec 9, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS) wrote:
Hi list,
today I was in a meeting about GeoExt, and the following question
came up:
"Is it possible for OsGeo to take copyright for a project which yet
has to form and has not passed incubation as such?"
It's certainly muc
I would inform you that there will be a scheduled OSGeo web server
service outage on Dec 6 at 1700 UTC. It is expected to last 3 hours
until 2000 UTC. The lights will probably flicker a bit during that
time as we work through some svn/trac authentication issues.
Howard
__
tment of Natural Resources, and its primary developers are Howard
Butler and Mateusz Loskot. Special features of libLAS include:
- C, C++, and Python APIs -- embed libLAS in your own programs or use
the Python bindings for a one-off processing script
- Spatial Reference System support -- th
On May 6, 2008, at 3:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the past i've heard it suggested that really successful open source
projects now need serious organisational backing. They can't be built
by a network of partly-funded enthusiast contributors alone.
I think really successful open source
think any
real effort to progress on this should involve understanding what is
already there at gispython.org. It might be fruitful to discuss the
idea with Sean Gilles or Howard Butler who are knowledgable about
the existing python interfaces.
PCL is actually moving the other way. Rather than a
On Jan 17, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
If you were to lead the development of this material and put it into
the Open Source (with your name attached) this would give you extra
credibility and marketing reach.
Why? Why must OTG put their hard earned training materials in the
On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:33 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
Despite that, user must first and foremost understand they are not
the driver.
... unless they pony up with money and/or time. As Tim said, you are
either a sink or a source. As an open source developer, I invest in
you the user (in money
On Sep 30, 2007, at 4:10 PM, Paul Spencer wrote:
What do others think about this? Should OSGeo be in the business
of helping new OSGeo projects get off the ground?
I don't think OSGeo should generally be in the business of getting
new projects off the ground. I think a project should esta
Open source software works because people acting in their own self
interest have the auxiliary benefit of helping everyone in the
project. Report your pet bug, file a patch, add a new feature -- all
of these things immediately help you, but ultimately help the
project. This activity also
29 matches
Mail list logo