[OSGeo-Discuss] OGC compliance of WMS client
Hi, is a WMS-Client using REQUEST=getcapabilities instead of REQUEST=GetCapabilities still in compliance with OGC standard (VERSION1.1.1 as well as 1.3.0)? I don't think so, but I'm unsure. Marco -- + FOSSGIS 2013, Die Konferenz für Open Source GIS mit OpenData und OpenStreetMap erstmals in der Schweiz! 12.-14. Juni, HSR, Rapperswil, http://www.fossgis.de/konferenz/2013/ + FOSSGIS e.V. die unabhängige Hilfe bei freier GIS-Software und freien Geodaten http://www.fossgis.de + ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OGC compliance of WMS client
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marco, it should be. There is a requirement within the WMS specification that defines REQUEST=GetCapabilities to be supported by a WMS Server. But it is not forbidden to have support for REQUEST=getcapabilities on the server side, too. For WMS clients, this means, requests shall use REQUEST=GetCapabilities because this is the only typing defined within the specification. Regards Sebastian - -- l a t / l o n GmbH Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany phone ++49 +228 18496-0 fax ++49 +228 18496-29 http://www.lat-lon.dehttp://www.deegree.org Am 22.04.2013 11:04, schrieb Marco Lechner - FOSSGIS e.V.: Hi, is a WMS-Client using REQUEST=getcapabilities instead of REQUEST=GetCapabilities still in compliance with OGC standard (VERSION1.1.1 as well as 1.3.0)? I don't think so, but I'm unsure. Marco -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlF0/hIACgkQq1hDh4aJykIovACgzJ2X2cEm1tSMhzIAOv1/Vhvl SokAnjpnEhjRB7x2/DaEITMdfXI2NWUr =8t+v -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OGC compliance of WMS client
The WMS client should use GetCapabilities, parameter values are case-sensitive. Parameter names are not case-sensitive. Best regards, Bart -- Bart van den Eijnden OSGIS - http://osgis.nl On Apr 22, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Marco Lechner - FOSSGIS e.V. marco.lech...@fossgis.de wrote: Hi, is a WMS-Client using REQUEST=getcapabilities instead of REQUEST=GetCapabilities still in compliance with OGC standard (VERSION1.1.1 as well as 1.3.0)? I don't think so, but I'm unsure. Marco -- + FOSSGIS 2013, Die Konferenz für Open Source GIS mit OpenData und OpenStreetMap erstmals in der Schweiz! 12.-14. Juni, HSR, Rapperswil, http://www.fossgis.de/konferenz/2013/ + FOSSGIS e.V. die unabhängige Hilfe bei freier GIS-Software und freien Geodaten http://www.fossgis.de + ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OGC compliance of WMS client
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, yes Andrea, but in my opinion it is not forbidden to have additional support for the other alternative. You have to implement the case sensitive KVP but it is not forbidden to implement the other additionally. Regards Sebastian - -- l a t / l o n GmbH Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany phone ++49 +228 18496-0 fax ++49 +228 18496-29 http://www.lat-lon.dehttp://www.deegree.org Am 22.04.2013 11:25, schrieb Andrea Aime: 2013/4/22 Marco Lechner - FOSSGIS e.V. marco.lech...@fossgis.de Hi, is a WMS-Client using REQUEST=getcapabilities instead of REQUEST=GetCapabilities still in compliance with OGC standard (VERSION1.1.1 as well as 1.3.0)? I don't think so, but I'm unsure. My understanding is that it's not. All OGC KVP protocols are based on the following (stated in the common ows spec): the key is case insensitive, the value is case sensitive So, something like ReQueSt=GetCapabilities is valid, but request=getcapabilities is not Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer training in Milan, 6th 7th June 2013! Visit http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlF1BFAACgkQq1hDh4aJykL7NACgo9QVxQUqlHe8p+SgGZC2QAVL cAwAoIDemfjwpKnXaAiyaf7OQSda8CN2 =s/wV -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OGC compliance of WMS client
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Sebastian Goerke goe...@lat-lon.dewrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, yes Andrea, but in my opinion it is not forbidden to have additional support for the other alternative. You have to implement the case sensitive KVP but it is not forbidden to implement the other additionally. That's a grey area in the spec indeed. There are CITE tests checking that the key is treated as case insensitive, but I don't remember one checking for case sensitive values. It would be interesting to see if there is anything in the WMS client CITE test suite? Was it made public, by the way? Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer training in Milan, 6th 7th June 2013! Visit http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it --- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OGC compliance of WMS client
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, all those posts confirm my understanding. @sebastian, of course its not a problem to make a server more tolerant (as many wms-servers are) to make it working with non-compliant clients, but the client has to use the correct request to stay in compliance. No dissent here. Marco Am 22.04.2013 11:35, schrieb Sebastian Goerke: Hi, yes Andrea, but in my opinion it is not forbidden to have additional support for the other alternative. You have to implement the case sensitive KVP but it is not forbidden to implement the other additionally. Regards Sebastian ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss - -- + FOSSGIS 2013, Die Konferenz für Open Source GIS mit OpenData und OpenStreetMap erstmals in der Schweiz! 12.-14. Juni, HSR, Rapperswil, http://www.fossgis.de/konferenz/2013/ + FOSSGIS e.V. die unabhängige Hilfe bei freier GIS-Software und freien Geodaten http://www.fossgis.de + -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlF1BvsACgkQq90xqWow83PQ1ACg4rY/VJR66H4c+pAxKFVS/pHg gnIAoLvC+Vs2pem+zMhHYQ4yY7+2KBTZ =6k+e -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OGC compliance of WMS client
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey, CITE WMS Client test suite is available through the current Beta release of TEAM Engine: http://cite.opengeospatial.org/te2/ I think, the WMS Client test suite covers this. Regards Sebastian Am 22.04.2013 11:43, schrieb Andrea Aime: On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Sebastian Goerke goe...@lat-lon.dewrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, yes Andrea, but in my opinion it is not forbidden to have additional support for the other alternative. You have to implement the case sensitive KVP but it is not forbidden to implement the other additionally. That's a grey area in the spec indeed. There are CITE tests checking that the key is treated as case insensitive, but I don't remember one checking for case sensitive values. It would be interesting to see if there is anything in the WMS client CITE test suite? Was it made public, by the way? Cheers Andrea - -- l a t / l o n GmbH Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany phone ++49 +228 18496-0 fax ++49 +228 18496-29 http://www.lat-lon.dehttp://www.deegree.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlF1CEIACgkQq1hDh4aJykJAMQCggxQ1s/T2I4bzDgWMAtNUMiNF WFEAn3Ssn83AhyaY0j5pzCCXkxUCfACU =nYw4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
