UMP for vector GIS. Ravi Kumar
>
> --- On Sat, 22/8/09, Daniel Ames wrote:
>
>> From: Daniel Ames Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss]
>> Open Source Lurkers To: "OSGeo Discussions"
>> Date: Saturday, 22 August, 2009, 10:24 AM
>> Landon, et al.
>>
>
g OpenJUMP for vector GIS.
Ravi Kumar
--- On Sat, 22/8/09, Daniel Ames wrote:
> From: Daniel Ames
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open Source Lurkers
> To: "OSGeo Discussions"
> Date: Saturday, 22 August, 2009, 10:24 AM
> Landon, et al.
>
> I'm aware of this p
iscussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open Source Lurkers
Evening Landon:
As you have gathered from the responses thus far that lurkers are
actually the larger part of the user community - and do not really
represent an opportunity to acquire new developers for your project.
The point is
Evening Landon:
As you have gathered from the responses thus far that lurkers are
actually the larger part of the user community - and do not really
represent an opportunity to acquire new developers for your project.
The point is that they are part of the user community; and are
probably
Landon Blake ha scritto:
> Is OpenJUMP the only community with these open source lurkers? How many
> of these companies do you think there are? (I’m not talking about one
> guy who downloads an open source app and uses it. I’m talking about
> actual companies with more than one employee.)
I know t
On 2009/08/21 11:55 AM, Landon Blake wrote:
I would like to get some comments on a phenomenon I have discovered
among the OpenJUMP community. I know for sure of one (1) company that
maintains a separate fork of OpenJUMP, but which monitors our mailing
list and likely grabs patches form our source
Hi Landon,
What I feel it is also part of "Me-too" effect when such a event happens.
for eg.
If a person from X company is using any of the "Open Source Intiative".
His/Her collegue from their own or some other division/company find out they
start there own endavour to get to it without any cont
Landon, et al.
I'm aware of this phenomenon in the MapWindow community as well. It is
particularly prominent with non-English speaking folks who, for a number of
reasons (mostly described by Bill below) don't feel comfortable joining the
conversation and openly participating in the project.
I thi
I've been a moderator for a commercial desktop mapping forum for more
than 10 years and this behavior is quite common. I think it has more to
do with how people adapt to a social network than it has to do with
anything unique in the Open Source world. Like Chris mentioned, the
majority of subsc
-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 1:49 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open Source Lurkers
Landon Blake wrote:
> What do you think? Send an e-mail to the project list with an
> invitation to contact me privately about getting more in
Landon Blake wrote:
> What do you think? Send an e-mail to the project list with an
> invitation to contact me privately about getting more involved? Are
> these lurkers worth the time?
I would write a post on my blog:
***
Wow! This is a fantastic news!
I've just been told that the big company X
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open Source Lurkers
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:55:30AM -0700, Landon Blake wrote:
> Is OpenJUMP the only community with these open source lurkers?
No.
> How many of these companies do you think there are? (I'm not talking
about
> one guy who downloads
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:55:30AM -0700, Landon Blake wrote:
> Is OpenJUMP the only community with these open source lurkers?
No.
> How many of these companies do you think there are? (I'm not talking about
> one guy who downloads an open source app and uses it. I'm talking about
> actual compa
I would like to get some comments on a phenomenon I have discovered
among the OpenJUMP community. I know for sure of one (1) company that
maintains a separate fork of OpenJUMP, but which monitors our mailing
list and likely grabs patches form our source code repository. They
never participate in th
14 matches
Mail list logo
