Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ZOO-Project WPS Validity report

2010-09-20 Thread Jody Garnett
Well it is an interesting discussion; and it will be a very important area for all implementations to succeed with (if the vision of process chaining is to proceed). I am especially keen to see both client code appear; and also how the different implementations will act as "clients" when they ar

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ZOO-Project WPS Validity report

2010-09-20 Thread Gérald Fenoy
Hi Jody, thanks for your answer. Indeed we wish to get blog posts about this specifically, I'm hopping than some of this mailing list readers will post on their own blog. Somebody from the ZOO-Discuss mailing list already post the content of the previous mail [1]. Hope to see more blog posts a

Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ZOO-Project WPS Validity report

2010-09-20 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks for following up on what was an excellent series of WPS presentations at foss4g this year. I was amazed to see so many presentations devoted to WPS. One that really stood out as a usage report was the EnviModel presentation. Using WPS, R stats, and numerous other components to get the jo

[OSGeo-Discuss] ZOO-Project WPS Validity report

2010-09-20 Thread Gérald Fenoy
Hi All, Several WPS related presentation at FOSS4G2010 including the one entitled "Compliance testing of Open Source Software for Web Processing Services" took place this year [1]. The presentation above reported about some incorrect results about the ZOO-WPS implementation. So the ZOO-Tribe d