Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-05 Thread pski
radish;287129 Wrote: That's only because Apple keep ALAC locked up. That's obviously not in your best interest, because it made your life difficult, and there's no technical reason for it, so why do it? I don't see why you'd continue to support a company who intentionally made it harder than

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-04 Thread Peter
amey01 wrote: bpa;287110 Wrote: SC lets you choose - Apple does not. Why won't Apple support Flac or WMA Lossless ? On the Audiophile forum there are a group of users who insist that server decoder Flac sounds better than SB decoded Flac. Why is it necessary to have ALAC decoder in the

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-04 Thread Anne
Well, can just add, that with this page open, and SqueezeCenter running and music transmitting wirelessly my computer runs a steady 602 MB usage in memory. I have upgraded to 2GB a year ago. But, at the same time, just 2 minuttes ago I experienced the music stopped for a second twice, (playing a

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-03 Thread Peter
bpa wrote: This describes the issue and fix. http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5521 I'm no Apple fan, but with their market position it would be nice to have lossless files that work natively on the iPod and the SB range. Not if it would mean ditching FLAC though... Regards,

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-03 Thread jaffacake
peter;287098 Wrote: bpa wrote: This describes the issue and fix. http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5521 I'm no Apple fan, but with their market position it would be nice to have lossless files that work natively on the iPod and the SB range. Not if it would mean

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-03 Thread bpa
SC lets you choose - Apple does not. Why won't Apple support Flac or WMA Lossless ? On the Audiophile forum there are a group of users who insist that server decoder Flac sounds better than SB decoded Flac. Why is it necessary to have ALAC decoder in the SB ? The decoders required in the SB

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-03 Thread radish
jaffacake;287104 Wrote: If I need to convert to something else, a couple of clicks in iTunes and I can convert my entire library to AIFF and onwards to FLAC etc. Going the other way FROM FLAC isn't so easy at all. That's only because Apple keep ALAC locked up. That's obviously not in your

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-03 Thread amey01
bpa;287110 Wrote: SC lets you choose - Apple does not. Why won't Apple support Flac or WMA Lossless ? On the Audiophile forum there are a group of users who insist that server decoder Flac sounds better than SB decoded Flac. Why is it necessary to have ALAC decoder in the SB ? The

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-02 Thread amey01
didjean;286256 Wrote: Maybe this thread can help you: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38082 Brilliant thread - thank you! I'll download what they mention and try it NOW! -- amey01 amey01's Profile:

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-02 Thread bpa
AMey01, That fix was for pre 6.5.4 systems - it has been included into SC. Also it sounds unlike the problem you're having. What version of SC/SS do you have ? What are the values for Server Setting/Advanced/Filetypes for Apple Lossless (assuming SC7) ? What security s/w are you using ? --

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-02 Thread amey01
FIXED - yes, the upgraded ALAC.exe fixed the issue. I am running SS 6.5.4. ALAC files now skip instantly. Out of interest, what was wrong with the original ALAC.exe file? -- amey01 amey01's Profile:

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-02 Thread bpa
This describes the issue and fix. http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5521 -- bpa bpa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1806 View this thread:

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-01 Thread jaffacake
funkstar;285617 Wrote: Yes in theory ALAC could be decoded in the SB3, but there are several issues to that. Memory is limited in the SB3, with MP3, FLAC, Ogg and WMA (lossy) already in there there probably isn't enough space for anything else (I seem to remember reading that Ogg was the

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-01 Thread funkstar
jaffacake;286012 Wrote: Interesting thread, I didn't realise transcoding was required for ALAC sources. No legal complication, ALAC is in the firmware for Sonos devices without any issues...they don't use a server. That may be so, but they may have licensed the software. I don't know the

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-01 Thread jaffacake
funkstar;286047 Wrote: That may be so, but they may have licensed the software. I don't know the ins and outs of it, I'm just guessing here. It may be the case that the SB/Transporter could easily have in built playback of ALAC if it just had a little more flash memory. Again, only guessing

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-01 Thread funkstar
Yeah sounds about right. Like I said, all speculation on my part :) -- funkstar funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2335 View this thread:

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-01 Thread bpa
Beware of the troll. -- bpa bpa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1806 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=45563 ___

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-01 Thread amey01
funkstar;286086 Wrote: Yeah sounds about right. Like I said, all speculation on my part :) Thinking about this a little more. ALAC decoding in the device is more important for Sonos _because_ they don't have a server to do the grunt work. With the Logitech products, the firmware has all

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-04-01 Thread didjean
Maybe this thread can help you: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38082 -- didjean didjean's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2900 View this thread:

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-03-31 Thread funkstar
amey01;285494 Wrote: 1: Is there any way to speed up the ALAC processing? Sounds like It is the speed of your server slowing things down. I've not used ALAC files or any other transcoding really. Someone else should be better placed to answer that. amey01;285494 Wrote: 2: I don't quite

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-03-31 Thread moley6knipe
Agreed - it's almost certainly your PC that's causing the bottle-neck. My library is almost all ALAC and it plays/pauses/skips the same speed as mp3, which is native to the SB3. With only 512Mb RAM perhaps (if you haven't done so already) you could cut out uneccesary running services? Worth an

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-03-31 Thread amey01
Thanks for the replies - it looks like I'll be upgrading memory as the server is SS only - runs nothing else, and I've already tried to reduce as many services as possible. At least computer upgrades are cheap - unlike audio upgrades! -- amey01

Re: [slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-03-31 Thread moley6knipe
Cool, I found when running 6.5.4 on my old 1.7 Ghz Celeron that performance improved noticeably when I stuck more memory in. Here's a link for some more XP memory saving/performance enhancing tweaks... http://www.xpmaximized.com/ Also, it's worth cleaning out the registry if you haven't done

[slim] ALAC and FLAC

2008-03-30 Thread amey01
I can't find anything in searching, but maybe I'm just searching for the wrong thing - I find it hard to believe nobody's raised this. (Sorry if it's been raised before)! Anyway - the bulk of my library is in ALAC, but some music is in FLAC. I've noticed that the FLAC files start and skip