Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-29 Thread SJobson
BlueScreenJunky;389900 Wrote: That's a matter of personal taste I guess : The SB3 has a slightly larger display and a full-sized remote. But you should indeed take it into account.Indeed - and I prefer the SB3's display, and occasionally use the SB3's remote with my Boom. However, the

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-28 Thread Mark Lanctot
Labarum;389820 Wrote: I had noted your point, and I am at a disadvantage in not having heard even a Boom. It does have a plastic case, and I expect chucks out highly processed sound which can be very convincing, as with the Bose radios. Not highly processed at all. Instead the DSP is

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-28 Thread Labarum
I am trying to locate a supplier in Cyprus, but it looks s if I will end up taking what I need with me. http://www.technica.com.cy/cyprus/logitech Is as close as I have got. Interestingly it is just up the hill from where I will be living. But no Slim Devices. -- Labarum Brian Squeezebox 3

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-27 Thread hardflipman
how about something like a set of acoustic energy aego M speakers with an SB3? they're apprently excellent speakers. although if you got them new it would take you over the cost of a Boom. the creative labs T20s are also supposed to be very good and can be had for about £50 -- hardflipman

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-27 Thread Labarum
iPhone;389695 Wrote: I think maybe you missed one of my points. That point being that to equal the sound of the Boom, your going to end up spending two to three times the Boom to get it with powered speakers and a Classic. There is NO WAY a pair of speakers costing £30 is going to sound

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-27 Thread Trevor
I purchased a Squeeze box duet about a year ago with AudioEngine speakers. A few months later, I purchased a Boom for a different room when it first came out. I think the sound quality from both is very good. However, if I was to have the choice now that both products are available, I'd

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-27 Thread BlueScreenJunky
Or if you're ready to spend more than the price of the boom, maybe you could buy a Boom and a cheap Subwoofer, which from what I heard drastically improves the sound quality of the boom. So you have the advantages of both solutions : a better sound quality than just a Boom, and the Nicer and

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-27 Thread SJobson
There's been no mention of the slight functional differences of the Boom - having buttons on the front, and a big knob which you can use as a volume control, makes it far easier for non-geeks to turn on and use. My wife doesn't touch my SB3, but she loves the Boom in the kitchen. Although in

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-27 Thread BlueScreenJunky
That's a matter of personal taste I guess : The SB3 has a slightly larger display and a full-sized remote. But you should indeed take it into account. -- BlueScreenJunky BlueScreenJunky's Profile:

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-27 Thread Labarum
What does the Boom weigh? Specs only have Dimensions: 13W x 5H x 3.1D I would take one to Cyprus by air in my luggage if it was not too heavy. -- Labarum Brian Squeezebox 3 Classic and Virgin Cable Box Beresford DAC TC-7510 MK6/4 - Quad 405-2 refurbished by 405man Quart 980s German Tower

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-27 Thread Pat Farrell
BlueScreenJunky wrote: Or if you're ready to spend more than the price of the boom, maybe you could buy a Boom and a cheap Subwoofer, which from what I heard drastically improves the sound quality of the boom. I disagree. For my tastes, the Boom has all the bass that I'd ever want it to have.

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-27 Thread Gazjam
Acoustic Energy Aego Ms are fantastic little speakers that can fill a room convincingly. A Sub/sat system, the sat's weigh a ton (made from metal) and are very solid. Good quality cabling provided too. I use a set in my Study hooked up to a Mk6/3 Beresford Dac playing Flacs and it makes for a

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-27 Thread Labarum
Gazjam;389913 Wrote: Acoustic Energy Aego Ms are fantastic little speakers that can fill a room convincingly. £107 - £109 now http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=SP-000-AEutm_source=froogle -- Labarum Brian Squeezebox 3 Classic and Virgin Cable Box Beresford DAC TC-7510

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-27 Thread MeSue
Labarum;389904 Wrote: What does the Boom weigh? Amazon.com says the shipping weight is 8 pounds. I'm not sure how accurate that is but it weighs more than it looks like it would weigh. -- MeSue Sue http://www.last.fm/user/MeSue

[slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-26 Thread Labarum
Has anyone made such a comparison? The items I have in mind on the UK market have a wood, well particle board, cabinets, and are £30 from Maplin http://www.maplin.co.uk/Module.aspx?ModuleNo=27962 Can others recommend other active speakers that would produce a system about or below the price of

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-26 Thread Peter
Labarum wrote: Has anyone made such a comparison? The items I have in mind on the UK market have a wood, well particle board, cabinets, and are £30 from Maplin http://www.maplin.co.uk/Module.aspx?ModuleNo=27962 Can others recommend other active speakers that would produce a system about

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-26 Thread aubuti
The comparison most often made between Boom and SB+active speakers is the 'Audioengine A2' (http://www.audioengineusa.com/a2_home.php). Search the forums for what various listeners have to say. Most say the A2s are comparable to the Boom in sound quality, but they're a lot more than GBP 30. For

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-26 Thread Labarum
aubuti;389435 Wrote: The comparison most often made between Boom and SB+active speakers is the 'Audioengine A2' (http://www.audioengineusa.com/a2_home.php). Search the forums for what various listeners have to say. Most say the A2s are comparable to the Boom in sound quality, but they're a

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-26 Thread iPhone
Labarum;389429 Wrote: Has anyone made such a comparison? The items I have in mind on the UK market have a wood, well particle board, cabinets, and are £30 from Maplin http://www.maplin.co.uk/Module.aspx?ModuleNo=27962 Can others recommend other active speakers that would produce a

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-26 Thread morsejeff
I have a Boom in the kitchen and an SB3 Classic with Audioengine A5's in the bedroom. I purchased the Boom for the bedroom, but moved it to the kitchen because even though it sounded very good, IMO it lacked stereo separation. So if you want stereo separation, go for the Classic and powered

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-26 Thread Labarum
morsejeff;389580 Wrote: So if you want stereo separation, go for the Classic and powered speakers (or receiver/speakers). . . it will cost a couple hundred dollars more. Depends on the cost of the speakers, and if the £30 Maplin speakers better the Boom output, I'm ahead. Best UK price for

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-26 Thread fredbloggs
to be honest, if you're happy with the suond quailty from a couple of 30 quid speakers then i'd imagine stereo seperation wouldn't be too high on the list of concerns. I prefer the boom, don't have to go hunting for the remote all the time and can just do stuff on the box. -- fredbloggs

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-26 Thread iPhone
Labarum;389593 Wrote: Depends on the cost of the speakers, and if the £30 Maplin speakers better the Boom output, I'm ahead. Best UK price for an SB3 seems here at the moment http://www.cooltopia.com/product.php/6/30 SB3 £130 Maplin Speakers £30 Boom £170 Portability might be a

Re: [slim] Boom versus SB3 cheap acive speakers

2009-01-26 Thread DeVerm
A happened to have a $30.- Logitech X-230 2.1 speaker system in the pilothouse aboard Jedi. This set has so much base that I stuffed it's reflex-port with a piece of cloth even after turning the sub's volume as low as possible. I recently connected an additional SBR to it and it sounds quite