JimC;207787 Wrote:
With the new local language support, I'm not sure how much room is left
for storage in FW. It's also a bit inconsistent with the idea of the
renderer being slim (or server-driven). And, yes, it opens a box I'm
not sure we can or want to open.
Without having read the
Ted Cabeen;208208 Wrote:
JimC wrote:
peterw;207760 Wrote:
...Slimserver 7.0 will allow us to connect to SqueezeNetwork through
our
local Slimservers, so that third party plugins like IR Blaster will
work
-- as well as also allowing direct connections to SN as in the
current
model.
peterw;207848 Wrote:
I'd rather see Logitech port IRBlaster to SN if there's really much
customer demand. Keep that relatively heavy logic on the server side.
I can't even imagine the hit to responsiveness you'd see when mapping
remote keypresses via a server residing on the Internet.
--
I can't even imagine the hit to responsiveness you'd see when mapping
remote keypresses via a server residing on the Internet.
Just connect to SQN right now - you'll see it immediately (or not!). All
IR commands are handled by the server already.
Michael
)p(;207813 Wrote:
Why not just a simple ir-repeater option in the firmware. And very
useful for a lot of people. I know I would love ti see that happen :)
peter
Hmmm... perhaps I'm missing something, but how will that solve the
problem? The request is for IR blaster plug-in functionality
How exactly will the Squeezebox-SlimServer-SqueezeNetwork connection
SlimServer should work as kind of proxy who's requesting the information
from SQN. In fact that's already the case today for most of the radio
stations: when you browse eg. Shoutcast, SlimServer will fetch the list of
If you want to get an idea of how SN services will work via SS7, try a
recent trunk build. MP3tunes and most of Rhapsody Direct are already
working.
--
andyg
andyg's Profile:
)p(;207813 Wrote:
Why not just a simple ir-repeater option in the firmware. And very
useful for a lot of people. I know I would love ti see that happen :)
I'd rather see Logitech port IRBlaster to SN if there's really much
customer demand. Keep that relatively heavy logic on the server
Hello,
I noticed that when the SqueezeBox is connected to SqueezeNetwork, the
IRBlaster plugin is not operating. Is there a way to change that? I
have the SqueezeBox turning my amp on and off, which I find quite
useful, but that doesn't work when it's connected to SqueezeNetwork
8-(.
Thanks,
That would mean that you would need to be upload your specific IRBlaster
codes to your personal settings on the Squeezenetwork site. This would
require an addition to the plugin (generating a file ready for upload,
and logging on to Squeezenetwork for doing so), and an extension to the
services
I'd noticed this too.. would be great if it did work.. as I've pretty
much shied away from using SqueezeNetwork due to it..
--
realityloop
realityloop's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11508
View
peterw;207760 Wrote:
...Slimserver 7.0 will allow us to connect to SqueezeNetwork through our
local Slimservers, so that third party plugins like IR Blaster will work
-- as well as also allowing direct connections to SN as in the current
model.
-Peter
Peter is correct, the current plan
How exactly will the Squeezebox-SlimServer-SqueezeNetwork connection
work and what are the advantages over just using the capabilities of
SlimServer? I thought the plans were more along the lines of having
SlimServer sync with SqueezeNetwork settings and favorites, so the SB
isn't actually
JJZolx;207769 Wrote:
How exactly will the Squeezebox-SlimServer-SqueezeNetwork connection
work and what are the advantages over just using the capabilities of
SlimServer? I thought the plans were more along the lines of having
SlimServer sync with SqueezeNetwork settings and favorites, so
14 matches
Mail list logo
