[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-25 Thread MattH
Hi after a bit of a delay I now have a replacement which is build and working fine :-) -- MattH MattH's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3971 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthre

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-19 Thread Siduhe
hdarwen Wrote: > as a (much!) simpler question ... has anybody out there got multiple > values > in genres working? Slightly off topic, but yes, absolutely, and using a single tag. I have Server Settings / Behaviour / Multiple Items In Tags set to ";" and my files are tagged with Tag & Rename

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-18 Thread Michaelwagner
The SB3s were only brought out shortly before the end of last year. I don't work for Slim, but reprising the conversations on this forum at the time: An improperly formed aluminum faceplate together with an incorrect setting on a torqx automatic screwdriver combined to push the back case agains

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-18 Thread CardinalFang
PAUL WILLIAMSON Wrote: > I can't understand why people think plugging in a stereo to some > speakers is so hard That reminds of the attempt in Europe to ban 4mm plugs on speaker leads because someone managed to plug them into the mains outlet when setting up their stereo and electrocuted themsel

Re: [slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-17 Thread Jack Coates
... > I think it's more of an assumption than anything that Sean & Co. have > opted for the "audiophile niche market". I repeatedly see people > assert this but I haven't seen anything from the Slim folks that > confirms or denies it. > I'm guessing that's because they wisely see these discussion

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-17 Thread Michaelwagner
For historical reasons, a bare number in the genre field is interpretated as a short cut for one of a short list of "standard" genres. It isn't clear what semi-colon support (a non-standard Slim thing) has done to this support. You may be tripping over this "feature". In this old standard, 12 w

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-17 Thread PAUL WILLIAMSON
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/16/06 8:17 PM >>> snarlydwarf Wrote: >Interesting. > > Most people I know have hundreds (if not thousands) of CDs and at > least decent stereos. They listen to music all the time. I would love > to see a Squeezebox in all of their homes but it has to be a bit easier

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-17 Thread PAUL WILLIAMSON
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/16/06 11:48 AM >>> > > PAUL WILLIAMSON Wrote: > > >>> > > Who the hell is this guy "Joe 6-Pack" I keep hearing about? > > And why is he concerned about audio quality while he's drunk? > > > > I doubt most Joe 6-Pack's give 2 hoots about audio quality, and > > even less

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread snarlydwarf
Perhaps the people you know aren't.. well.. normal. :) Look at the junk that's circulating on p2p networks.. "oh, yeah, 128k mp3! this will sound great!" (I may not be a total audiophile, but I can still spot a 128k mp3 even on cruddy pc speakers...) (I used to think RIAA should just not care

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread jmpage2
snarlydwarf Wrote: > I agree, Radish. > > I don't know if 'network audio players' will ever be 'mainstream' as > ipods: most people really don't listen to that much music at home. > > Thanks to the old Sony Walkman, people are used to listening to music > while exercising or just 'getting aroun

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread snarlydwarf
I agree, Radish. I don't know if 'network audio players' will ever be 'mainstream' as ipods: most people really don't listen to that much music at home. Thanks to the old Sony Walkman, people are used to listening to music while exercising or just 'getting around'. Thanks to car stereos they're

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread Wirrunna
Down under in Oztralia, the high end audio retailers have a thriving installation business for home theatre, home automation etc. As Cardinal Fang said -"The same people typically get the person who sold it to set it up for them" applies here to high end audio. Perhaps we will see Slim Devices sol

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread radish
When I look at SlimDevices I see a small but thriving company which has been around longer than (or simply outlived) pretty much all it's competitors, and that is continuing to bring out new innovative products which have built them a healthy (and at times rabid) fan base. That's far more than mos

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread CardinalFang
jmpage2 Wrote: > I think it's more of an assumption than anything that Sean & Co. have > opted for the "audiophile niche market". I repeatedly see people > assert this but I haven't seen anything from the Slim folks that > confirms or denies it. Quite. It happens to be well designed and sound go

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread Fifer
I was very careful not to say they had. No assumption on my part. -- Fifer Fifer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=639 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=21126 __

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread jmpage2
Fifer Wrote: > Again, if you want to run a successful mass market consumer products > business, that might have an element of truth in it but you can run a > highly profitable business catering to tech-savvy audiophiles without > giving a second thought to such concerns. It all depends on the > b

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread Fifer
CardinalFang Wrote: > but if you actually want to run a successful consumer products business > you have to take into account that people in general don't like wiring > up electronic equipment. Again, if you want to run a successful mass market consumer products business, that might have an elem

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread CardinalFang
kdf Wrote: > Must be nice to not have to hook up someone else's tv, sattelite dish, > surround sound or program the VCR becuase they are too intimidated. > None of this is new, and certainly didn't stop such equipment from > becoming mainstream. Or, am I misunderstanding the meaning of > mainst

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread jmpage2
kdf Wrote: > Quoting CardinalFang forums.slimdevices.com>: > > > I was explaining my SB setup to someone I work with who loves music > and > > has tons of CDs. She wanted to get one when she saw how good looking > it > > was and when I told hert how much I liked it. Her comment was "my > > son-

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread jmpage2
CardinalFang Wrote: > I was explaining my SB setup to someone I work with who loves music and > has tons of CDs. She wanted to get one when she saw how good looking it > was and when I told hert how much I liked it. Her comment was "my > son-in-law will have to set this up for me if it involves i

Re: [slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread kdf
Quoting CardinalFang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I was explaining my SB setup to someone I work with who loves music and has tons of CDs. She wanted to get one when she saw how good looking it was and when I told hert how much I liked it. Her comment was "my son-in-law will have to set this up for me i

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread jmpage2
snarlydwarf Wrote: > And some of us drunken porn loving slobbish morons enjoy great music, > too. Ya! :) .. -- jmpage2 jmpage2's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=41 View this

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread CardinalFang
jmpage2 Wrote: > You'd probably be rather astounded then by the number of "normal Joes" > who have marvelled at my Squeezebox setup only to be intimidated by > what it takes to get the whole thing set up and working. I was explaining my SB setup to someone I work with who loves music and has ton

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread snarlydwarf
> a drunken porn loving slobbish moron. And some of us drunken porn loving slobbish morons enjoy great music, too. -- snarlydwarf snarlydwarf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1179 View this threa

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread jmpage2
PAUL WILLIAMSON Wrote: > >>> > Who the hell is this guy "Joe 6-Pack" I keep hearing about? > And why is he concerned about audio quality while he's drunk? > > I doubt most Joe 6-Pack's give 2 hoots about audio quality, and > even less about a computer. Unless a squeezebox can be used > to pl

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread Michaelwagner
jmpage2 Wrote: > How you extract that by selling to the masses Slim Devices is somehow > selling to "stupid americans" is beyond belief. >From this line: > > it will require much dumbing down of software and installation for that > to happen And, you misunderstood my point. I'm not against

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread PAUL WILLIAMSON
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/15/06 7:52 PM >>> radish Wrote: > Well, yes, and you could also get 400 candy bars or 20 CDs - but I fail > to see the comparison. If I wanted a PC running Linux that's what I > would have bought... > I think that Sean and company have done quite well catering to > th

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread Fifer
jmpage2 Wrote: > The point is that the Slim box fits into the general computing category. > In whose opinion? jmpage2 Wrote: > I think that Sean and company have done quite well catering to the > geeks, tweakers and audio nuts, but at some point to keep selling > equipment they will have to cat

Re: [slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread Ben Sandee
On 2/16/06, MattH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am just disappointed that manufactoring defects we not picked.Maybe I was just unlucky...You were unlucky.  I hope you took the time to ask SlimDevices to fix the problem -- which we all know they will, promptly. Ben ___

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread jonheal
jmpage2 Wrote: > The point is that the Slim box fits into the general computing category. > How many network appliances fetch $300 (answer, not too many). Whether > it is "expensive" or a "bargain" is obviously in the eye of the > individual consumer. Personally I think that the Squeezebox is >

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-16 Thread MattH
Robster Wrote: > > Expensive? you are joking right?...for what it does it's a stone > cold bargain. > > Rob UK price is £220 which is approx $380. I personally think this is expensive, compared to the Soundbridge, but agree that it(Squeezebox) is the superior product. I am just disappoi

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-15 Thread jmpage2
Michaelwagner Wrote: > I think the quote we're looking for is: > > > http://www.quotedb.com/quotes/2199 > > I guess it's up to Sean & Dean (gee, a California beach band) if they > want to go that way or not. How you extract that by selling to the masses Slim Devices is somehow selling to "stu

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-15 Thread MrC
Michaelwagner Wrote: > I think the quote we're looking for is: > > > http://www.quotedb.com/quotes/2199 Mencken did have a sharp tongue! I think the quote was: H.L. Mencken Wrote: > No one in this world, so far as I know ... has ever lost money by > underestimating the intelligence of the g

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-15 Thread Michaelwagner
I think the quote we're looking for is: > No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American > people http://www.quotedb.com/quotes/2199 I guess it's up to Sean & Dean (gee, a California beach band) if they want to go that way or not. -- Michaelwagner

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-15 Thread jmpage2
radish Wrote: > Well, yes, and you could also get 400 candy bars or 20 CDs - but I fail > to see the comparison. If I wanted a PC running Linux that's what I > would have bought... The point is that the Slim box fits into the general computing category. How many network appliances fetch $300 (a

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-15 Thread radish
jmpage2 Wrote: > For not much more than $300 you can get an actual PC running Linux. Well, yes, and you could also get 400 candy bars or 20 CDs - but I fail to see the comparison. If I wanted a PC running Linux that's what I would have bought... -- radish -

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-15 Thread jmpage2
Robster Wrote: > I'm getting back to the UK reseller, but it pretty dissapointing that > something this cool (and expensive) is let down by poor build quality > and/or quality assurance. > > MattH Expensive? you are joking right?...for what it does it's a stone cold bargain. Rob "stone c

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-15 Thread Robster
I'm getting back to the UK reseller, but it pretty dissapointing that something this cool (and expensive) is let down by poor build quality and/or quality assurance. MattH Expensive? you are joking right?...for what it does it's a stone cold bargain. Rob -- Robster So much music, so li

[slim] Re: SB3 Build Quality

2006-02-15 Thread Millwood
I just got two from Slim and both seem perfect. -- Millwood Millwood's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3600 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=21126 _