slartibartfast wrote:
> I am still considering doing this. Did you choose -18 as the target
> level for EBU R128?
Yes, default setting in dbPoweramp.
DrMatt, I have my "master" music library on a windows box where I rip,
tag etc, and use Vortexboxes as servers for pCp payers. (I have 2 SB3
and
Stratmangler wrote:
> At least you can set things going, turn around, and walk away from it
> while the process runs.
> Can you imagine how stressful things would be if you had to supervise
> things every step of the way? :eek:True but it doesn't help when someone
> unplugs the laptop instead of
slartibartfast wrote:
> Finally decided to convert all my replaygain tags to EBU R128. It would
> take around 18 hours of continuous processing for 46000 tracks. Twice
> that including the backup drive but probably still quicker than
> resynchronizing the files. Sometimes you start something and
Finally decided to convert all my replaygain tags to EBU R128. It would
take around 18 hours of continuous processing for 46000 tracks. Twice
that including the backup drive but probably still quicker than
resynchronizing the files. Sometimes you start something and wish you
hadn't bothered.
Sent
Wirrunna wrote:
> Interesting thread. First I have heard of EBU R128. A quick google
> brings up the details, so I thought I would compare calculated Replay
> Gain (RPG) from some music ripped in 2009 with dbPoweramp 13.2
> (presumably using Peak algorithm) and RPG re calculated using dbPoweramp
Wirrunna wrote:
> re-calculate RPG for my whole library, and for DrMatt I use
> BulkFileChanger to manipulate the file Modified Time to preserve the New
> Music order.
I'm on Linux, I'd script it myself. But then, I'm not going to be using
dbpoweramp either!
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Ta
Wirrunna wrote:
> Interesting thread. First I have heard of EBU R128. A quick google
> brings up the details, so I thought I would compare calculated Replay
> Gain (RPG) from some music ripped in 2009 with dbPoweramp 13.2
> (presumably using Peak algorithm) and RPG re calculated using dbPoweramp
Interesting thread. First I have heard of EBU R128. A quick google
brings up the details, so I thought I would compare calculated Replay
Gain (RPG) from some music ripped in 2009 with dbPoweramp 13.2
(presumably using Peak algorithm) and RPG re calculated using dbPoweramp
15.3 which uses the new E
bakker_be wrote:
> As far as I can see, metaflac is still using standard replaygain.
Yes, the code calculates levels still the same. The only thing changed a
while back was the support for higher samplerates.
Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA
monoblocks -> Sommer
drmatt wrote:
> I've always used metaflac but never investigated the algorithm in
> detail. I took the view as long as it was consistent I didn't care
>
>
> -Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
As far as I can see, metaflac is still using standard replaygain.
Main System: Touch; M
I've always used metaflac but never investigated the algorithm in
detail. I took the view as long as it was consistent I didn't care
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 45
If you use foobar to calculate replaygain, you've been using R128 since
v1.1.6 (http://www.foobar2000.org/changelog#section41), which to the
best of my knowledge is ±7 years old.
Main System: Touch; Marantz SR-5004 + TMA Premium 905 + TMA Premium 901
+ Teufel Ultima 20 Mk 2 + BK Monolith+ FF +
Well, off topic, but, dither is the reason. Applied correctly or not.
Argue at length..
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albu
slartibartfast wrote:
> I've never noticed any deterioration of sound quality with it on.
Why would there be? It's a simple amplification factor applied
uniformly to every audio sample. The only issue is when a RG tag drives
a sample into clipping, but LMS is designed to avoid that.
-
drmatt wrote:
> I've not noticed any either tbh, but I leave it off because then I have
> to blame the mastering engineers not replaygain for the sound being not
> to my satisfaction, and like the OP, I'm ok with operating my volume
> control about once every 45 minutes... :)
>
>
> -Transcoded
I've not noticed any either tbh, but I leave it off because then I have
to blame the mastering engineers not replaygain for the sound being not
to my satisfaction, and like the OP, I'm ok with operating my volume
control about once every 45 minutes... :)
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk
drmatt wrote:
> True, but personally I have more than one player and tend to leave it
> off on the players I care about and on everywhere else.
>
>
> -Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-I've never noticed any
> deterioration of sound quality with it on. Maybe
I'm not listening carefully
Mnyb wrote:
> Some tagging software has options to not touch the timestamps .Yeah and you
> can record mtime and set it back manually after the
retagging via a script or a short program but you can't fix the ctime,
which some programs use instead of mtime to determine what's new and
what's not (
slartibartfast wrote:
> It would be nice if an on/off switch for replaygain was available on
> players and control apps and not just hidden away in player settings of
> the web GUI.
>
> Sent from my SM-G900F using TapatalkTrue, but personally I have more than one
> player and tend to leave it
o
drmatt wrote:
> I don't see the downside.. for non critical listening replaygain in
> album mode is perfectly good, and when you feel like properly listening
> to something, turn replaygain off. Bingo the music data is the same and
> sounds the same as it did before the file was tagged.
>
> The
drmatt wrote:
> I don't see the downside.. for non critical listening replaygain in
> album mode is perfectly good, and when you feel like properly listening
> to something, turn replaygain off. Bingo the music data is the same and
> sounds the same as it did before the file was tagged.
>
> The
I don't see the downside.. for non critical listening replaygain in
album mode is perfectly good, and when you feel like properly listening
to something, turn replaygain off. Bingo the music data is the same and
sounds the same as it did before the file was tagged.
The one and only pain in the as
slartibartfast wrote:
> It is only a tag and EBU R128 tags are the same as Replaygain tags, just
> calculated differently. By apply I meant the tag.
>
> Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
I was just seeking clarification regarding the tags.
My experience with Replaygain tags, and LMS using t
Stratmangler wrote:
> I wouldn't be applying anything that irrevocably changes anything with
> the music files in my library.
> All of the files in my library have Replaygain *tags*, but there's been
> nothing applied to the files.
>
> Why the question about EBU R128 - does LMS handle the EBU R1
I wouldn't be applying anything that irrevocably changes anything with
the music files in my library.
All of the files have Replaygain *tags*, but there's been nothing
applied to the files.
Why the question about EBU R128 - does LMS handle the EBU R128 tags now?
Chris :)
--
cd /music
find . -type f -exec applygain {} \;
.. wait ..
It's just tagging, tags can be removed just as easily.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs.
pinkdot wrote:
> Why would you not apply this to all your files. Consistency is key here
> imo.Purely because of the hassle of actually doing it. I know I could set up
a batch convert but it would still take a long time.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
--
Stratmangler wrote:
> I find use of the term "apply it to all of their files" alarming.Why? Only
> audio files obviously.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
slartibartfast's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/mem
Why would you not apply this to all your files. Consistently is key here
imo.
-LMS on Raspian Stretch -> 2x Radio
-RPI 3 ('Mopidy' (https://www.mopidy.com/)), Aune S6 - Exposure 3010S2
- PMC FB1i
pinkdot's Profile: http:/
I find use of the term "apply it to all of their files" alarming.
Chris :)
Stratmangler's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20387
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=1089
Does anyone have any preference for Replaygain or EBU R128? If anyone is
using EBU R128 did they bother to apply it to all of their files or just
change over to it from a point in time? I am considering the changeover
but not entirely sure it is worth doing.
-
31 matches
Mail list logo
