Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-29 Thread wotuzu17
I haven't read all the post, but I remember having a similar problem. It turned out that on my IR remote one solder pad of the LED was broken. That bad contact caused the Squeezebox not accepting commands from the remote sometimes. I opened the remote, resoldered the LED, and I'm happy ever

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-27 Thread RonBor
I recently purchased a Duet for outside use and yesterday was really the first day I was able to use it for any length of time. Like you, I use SqueezeNetwork exclusively. All day I had problems similar to yours (drop outs, rebuffering, dead air = massive frustration and embarrassment).

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-23 Thread funkstar
izzym;417546 Wrote: And now for the weirdest partit SOUNDS better. The same stations that used to have a slight digital flanging type of artifact don't have it now. Imaging is better too. bits is bits?..hmmm Other than a lack of decompression errors due to insuficient data, the sound

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-23 Thread toby10
izzym;417546 Wrote: It turns out there's a built-in utility in my wireless driver that does what netstumbler does. Here's the weird part -- of about 2 dozen signals out there, the 10 next strongest to mine are ALL set to the SAME channel as mine! (#1). Most any WiFi device or

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-22 Thread izzym
toby10;417039 Wrote: Yup, it could be that simple. :) You may have had interfering ch #'s as most routers are set to ch 6 at the factory and many (most?) users do not ever change from the default ch #. Did you ever try NetStumbler to see what the neighbors ch #'s were? It turns out

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-21 Thread toby10
izzym;416969 Wrote: I forced my router to stay on channel 1. For the last few days, I've seen MUCH better response from the remote. It responds instantly now. I've only had 1 minor timeout in 3 days, and no rebufferings. To all that responded, thanks for all the help. I consider this

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-21 Thread lanierb
This is a very common problem with a simple solution (for now -- until some neighbors start clogging up the other channels too). More good news is you just made your home wifi network way more robust for other purposes as well -- you will likely get much better video throughput, better laptop

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-20 Thread izzym
I forced my router to stay on channel 1. For the last few days, I've seen MUCH better response from the remote. It responds instantly now. I've only had 1 minor timeout in 3 days, and no rebufferings. To all that responded, thanks for all the help. I consider this resolved unless something

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-17 Thread Mnyb
Have you tried to ping Squeezenetwork ? You could have a latency problem even if your internet is fast. They are some kinds of internet that simply do not work for this reason, often these bizarre satellite kind of isp. Example I can ping the US SqueezeNetwork with circa 200ms from Sweden and

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-17 Thread toby10
izzym;416028 Wrote: 1) I'm pretty sure my firmware is current. (See my previous post) 2) Never heard of Netstumbler...where can I get it? How does one go about changing the channels on a router? Ugh...I'll have to take a very close look at that router manual software. 3) SC...you mean

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-17 Thread izzym
Mnyb;416044 Wrote: Have you tried to ping Squeezenetwork ? You could have a latency problem even if your internet is fast. They are some kinds of internet that simply do not work for this reason, often these bizarre satellite kind of isp. Example I can ping the US SqueezeNetwork with

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-17 Thread izzym
toby10;416080 Wrote: http://www.netstumbler.com/downloads/ When you go to available WiFi networks from any of your wireless computers do you see networks other than yours? It would be best to do this with a laptop at the same location as your SB3. What you are looking for is a strong

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-17 Thread Peter
izzym wrote: Mnyb;416044 Wrote: Have you tried to ping Squeezenetwork ? You could have a latency problem even if your internet is fast. They are some kinds of internet that simply do not work for this reason, often these bizarre satellite kind of isp. Example I can ping the US

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-17 Thread toby10
izzym;416097 Wrote: Oh yes, there are several available wifi networks (all security enabled) with much lower signal strength. But my laptops SB3 don't even try to connect to them. But you're saying that because they're out there, it could be interfering? I might try forcing the router to

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-16 Thread izzym
seanadams;415531 Wrote: To rule out network or server issues, try navigating the firmware setup menu. Just use the up and down arrows within a menu. If the setup menu is responsive then you can be certain that the IR hardware is OK, otherwise it is certainly defective. Also note that an IR

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-16 Thread izzym
snarlydwarf;415620 Wrote: That implies to me that it is a network reliability issue. The usage of a slim device is different than a PC: PC's usually have tons of RAM to buffer things, so a short dropout on a wireless network just means a short dropout on keeping the buffer full.. there is

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-16 Thread izzym
OK, the router's channel is set to automatic...I can choose manually any number from 1 to 11 if needed. SSID enabled, MAC authentication disabled. The software reports normal, connected, GO status. Don't know if any of this helps. -- izzym

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-15 Thread ModelCitizen
I guess you've tried new batteries? :-) MC -- ModelCitizen On average people have fewer than two feet. http://www.last.fm/user/ModelCitizen ModelCitizen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=446

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-15 Thread Michael Herger
I've had a squeezebox 3 since Christmas. I use it almost all the time as an internet radio player through the squeezenetwork What you see might be the latency between your house and the SN servers. Where do you live? Where is your player connecting to (Settings/Information)? What kind of

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-15 Thread Peter
Mick Seymour wrote: It sounds like the remote might be faulty. Why not call Logitech support. To me it sounds more like the problem is in his network (internet) connection. Regards, Peter ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-15 Thread seanadams
izzym;415514 Wrote: I've had a squeezebox 3 since Christmas. I use it almost all the time as an internet radio player through the squeezenetwork (ie, the computer is usually turned off, or not running squeezecenter). My wireless router is connected via a FIOS fiber optic connection up to

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-15 Thread snarlydwarf
izzym;415514 Wrote: Aside from the annoying buffering, this thing fails to respond to the remote FAR too often... That implies to me that it is a network reliability issue. The usage of a slim device is different than a PC: PC's usually have tons of RAM to buffer things, so a short dropout

[slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-14 Thread izzym
I've had a squeezebox 3 since Christmas. I use it almost all the time as an internet radio player through the squeezenetwork (ie, the computer is usually turned off, or not running squeezecenter). My wireless router is connected via a FIOS fiber optic connection up to the side of the house...I

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-14 Thread Mick Seymour
It sounds like the remote might be faulty. Why not call Logitech support. -- Mick Seymour Mick Seymour's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21137 View this thread:

Re: [slim] why is the sb3 remote SO unreliable?

2009-04-14 Thread Phil Leigh
How is the SB connected to the router? -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... SB3 (wired) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods) - Linn 5103 - Aktiv 5.1 system (6x