swayzak;407812 Wrote:
Worryingly I rather agree with you.
So I'm making hay with MP3Tunes whilst it's sun shines (works very well
for me at the moment) ... ;)
Actually maybe Logitech should take over MP3Tunes ... the perfect
solution ?
--
swayzak
I have a PC with Windows XP used as a server. It connects to Transporter
via ethernet with switch in between. It also has a wireless card
installed and I want to use it to get my Duet Controller to control
squeezecenter, but how should I set up networking on that computer?
- Static IP or not?
-
My problems is, that the Classic don't respond to the remote. I've
received a new remote, so the problem isn't there. The Classic just
shows the time :-( It is however possible to control the unit via
Squeezecenter!
Any ideas what could be the problem and how to fix it?
--
sd2100
Yes, relative page numbers (A-5) is the way to go I think. You can't do
without page numbering if you plan on an index or any sort of lookup
table.
While I never used it, it looks like PDF-API2 (on CPAN) can be used to
generate a PDF.
--
epoch1970
Thanks for helping! I don't have that folder though. The existing
location in the system is the selected music root folder (where I
deleted the files by accident). Isn't the location configurable? Does
anybody know how to reset Favorites? Is Favorites an addon thing so I
could disable it and
kaja69;407959 Wrote:
Hi, I am new to squeezebox and by accident I deleted the favorites
files. Now I get Unable to open file: '.../favorites.opml' but I can't
see how to reset/regerate new favorites files and I can't see where I
chose the folder location for favorites. Please help, thanks!
You've received a good amount of advice on your other threads regarding
this.
Did you just get the switch? Return it and get a Linksys WRT54GL
router. Install DD-WRT or Tomato firmware, then enable WDS.
--
Mark Lanctot
Current: SB2, Transporter, Boom (PQP3 - late beta), SBC (early beta)
sd2100;407993 Wrote:
My problems is, that the Classic don't respond to the remote. I've
received a new remote, so the problem isn't there. The Classic just
shows the time :-( It is however possible to control the unit via
Squeezecenter!
Any ideas what could be the problem and how to fix
Yes, but I changed the OS and installed Windows. WRT54GL is too pricy
for me it costs 120$ delivered. Anyway, the setup worked out of the box
with XP so yeai!
--
cybervision_
cybervision_'s Profile:
That Napster music cannot be listed Album on the Squeezebox is proving a
bit of a nuisance. Andy has informed us that Napster have chosen to
only use Genre, Artist, Paylist as the basic music sorting options and
that is what we are stuck with.
I've contacted Napster to ask them if by-Album can
Hehe yeah, sorry there is no album listing. The Napster API is too
limited for me to be able to add it myself.
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread:
I appreciate this is off-topic, but after some Googling and failing to
find an answer, I thought I'd ask here in the friendliest forum I
know...
I've long been a user of Firefox, and often have an index page open
in one tab, then drag interesting links to another tab so I can read
them and then
It's very pretty, but for my collection, the printout would be huge (and
my collection is nowhere near as large as some here). I'd be interested
in a more compact presentation, or at least the option to do it a bit
smaller. There's a lot of wasted space on the pages. I do applaud
your effort.
Kyle;408064 Wrote:
It's very pretty, but for my collection, the printout would be huge (and
my collection is nowhere near as large as some here). I'd be interested
in a more compact presentation, or at least the option to do it a bit
smaller. There's a lot of wasted space on the pages. I
BTW I think you're getting it all wrong, on regular basis I just want
the Transporter hooked up via ethernet to my server, and I want to have
a Duet connected to the PC via wireless to control Squeezecenter with
it.
I have now been able to connect to the PC with the Duet controller but
it the
cliveb wrote:
I appreciate this is off-topic, but after some Googling and failing to
find an answer, I thought I'd ask here in the friendliest forum I
know...
I've long been a user of Firefox, and often have an index page open
in one tab, then drag interesting links to another tab so I can
From time to time I suffer from rebuffering :-(
I tried some things and it seems that distance, some settings (dhcp,
encoding etc., mode type b or g) on access point doesnt influence on
it.
So I consider changing my setup and go for wired. The question is : is
only wifi installation affected by
tipsen;408067 Wrote:
The conflict as I see it is the wish for as much information as possible
vs good compact layout. I would also very much like a more compact
design but I fail to see how I can accomplish this - do you have any
ideas?
/Tommy
One way to handle it would be to make the
It's not 100% guaranteed...it is 99.9% guaranteed. :-)
Ethernet has so much more bandwidth, you should never encounter a
rebuffering issue. About the only problem you'd ever encounter is a
bad cable, switch or NIC.
It's not affected by distance (not in a home anyway), interference,
competing
mirhon;408085 Wrote:
From time to time I suffer from rebuffering :-(
I tried some things and it seems that distance, some settings (dhcp,
encoding etc., mode type b or g) on access point doesnt influence on
it.
So I consider changing my setup and go for wired. The question is : is
only
cybervision_;408072 Wrote:
BTW I think you're getting it all wrong
I don't doubt that, I'm getting very confused! :-)
on regular basis I just want the Transporter hooked up via ethernet to
my server, and I want to have a Duet connected to the PC via wireless
to control Squeezecenter with
peter;408077 Wrote:
Hmm, been using FF for ages, but I never tried dragging links to other
tabs. Neat, pity you have to have other tabs open altready. That makes
it a lot less useful... Back to Ctrl-click... ;)
Actually, in FF, you do not need to have a tab open already. Just drag
swayzak;407976 Wrote:
Actually maybe Logitech should take over MP3Tunes ... the perfect
solution ?
I'd rather they look into MusicIP, since that's the real value-add for
me.
Actually I thought about this very issue, before I jumped in all the
way to the Squeeze universe. I really wanted it
sander;408112 Wrote:
I was less concerned about it in the Slimserver 6.x days since you
didn't need a squeezecenter login just to run it like you do now, and
most my devices are dependent on the 7.2 or newer.
I assume you mean SqueezeNetwork, and no you don't need a SN login to
run SC. It's
My main concern is that I'd be able to continue to use the hardware and
software to access my local files, internet radio and last.fm
services..
As things stand at the moment that would appear possible even if
Logitec went tits up.
SqueezeNetwork means very little to me if it didn't I be
Goodsounds;407605 Wrote:
If he still is the boss, one would think there would be better ways to
spend his time.
I've heard he's having lessons in how to park his car correctly.
MC
--
ModelCitizen
On average people have fewer than two feet.
http://www.last.fm/user/ModelCitizen
sander;408112 Wrote:
Has anyone run Squeezecenter on a machine that has no public net access
for a while?
Yes. I have a Ubuntu Server that runs SC 7.3.2 that only feeds my
Transporter. There is no router, no Cable Modem, no Wifi, just a CAT5
cable from the Ethernet port on the Server to the
Not the answer to the exact question, but perhaps close enough:
I can open a link in a new tab in IE7 by clicking the scroll-wheel of
my mouse on the link. I don't recall if I had to change the software
settings on my mouse to do that, but perhaps I did.
Alternatively, you can right-click on
I am a crestron certified programmer, and i own 3 squeezeboxes. I would
like to help if you are still looking for some help.
I am an audio nut, have tons of experience in Crestron.
--
ratscrew
ratscrew's Profile:
radish;408116 Wrote:
I assume you mean SqueezeNetwork, and no you don't need a SN login to
run SC. It's only needed for services (such as Pandora, Rhapsody, etc)
which are provided by SN.
SN is required for use of Live365, ShoutCast, and RadioIO from the SC7
menus as well.
Though I suppose
ModelCitizen;408124 Wrote:
I've heard he's having lessons in how to park his car correctly.
MC
Still?!?!?
(i lol'ed at this)
--
funkstar
funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2335
View
I have after a lot of nagging here decided to get a router and connect
my server-PC to it and connect wirelessly to it with my Transporter and
Controller.
What I was wondering about is this:
I use my other PC for ripping and the server will be standing in
another room without peripherals. Is
Sure - you just need to create a share of some type. What OS are you
running on the server PC? I have a Remote Desktop connection from
my Vista laptop to my XP server, but have it set up the other way with
the share on the laptop. My server is next to my workspace so I use to
rip as well,
There is an add-on for IE7 called IE7Pro which adds a lot of Firefox-y
goodness to IE. I'm not sure if it has this exact feature, but you
might want to look into it.
--
MeSue
Sue
http://www.last.fm/user/MeSue
MeSue's
I highly recommend wired. My SB3 worked fine for a couple of years,
then I began to have dropouts -- probably due to neighbors setting up
wireless networks, but who knows? I paid $100 for an alarm company to
run CAT-5 from my bedroom to my den (other end of the house). It was
money well spent.
Kyle wrote:
I highly recommend wired. My SB3 worked fine for a couple of years,
then I began to have dropouts -- probably due to neighbors setting up
wireless networks, but who knows? I paid $100 for an alarm company to
run CAT-5 from my bedroom to my den (other end of the house). It was
cdmackay;408179 Wrote:
Kyle wrote:
I highly recommend wired. My SB3 worked fine for a couple of years,
then I began to have dropouts -- probably due to neighbors setting
up
wireless networks, but who knows? I paid $100 for an alarm company
to
run CAT-5 from my bedroom to my den
Hi there,
I am VERY excited to see we can finally get a streaming music solution
similar to Rhapsody in Canada (come on Rhapsody, poor).
I fired up Napster tonightand was greeted with muted sounded boomy
music. I've googled around and poked on Napster's site but I can't
find where they
Ive recently discovered the Squeezebox Duet and fell in love with it
(well, on paper anyway) but I have just moved over to an entirely N
network, and Id really rather not run a separate G network too.
Since the new Linksys/Cisco and some of other audio streamers now run
on N networks, any rumors
Evan55 wrote:
any rumors that Squeezebox will be updating their
hardware to support N networks?
SlimDevices/Logitech never comments on future products.
But I would not expect them to support N until its actually released as
a spec. So far, its only a draft. And for some reason, getting it
mirhon;408085 Wrote:
From time to time I suffer from rebuffering :-(
I tried some things and it seems that distance, some settings (dhcp,
encoding etc., mode type b or g) on access point doesnt influence on
it.
So I consider changing my setup and go for wired. The question is : is
only
Duet, and g devices in general, play just fine with n. You won't have
issues as with b+g.
--
seanadams
seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3
View this thread:
Are you serious 32kbps :-)
Wov, have folks been pleading fo ages to logitech to implement a music
service thats streams in 32kbps ROLF .
And they expect money for this service.
It is completely impossible to enjoy any kind of music at that bit
rate.
Napster UK claim that they stream 128kbps ?
43 matches
Mail list logo
