garym;533654 Wrote:
This is incorrect. Google for lots of discussion/ explicit tests of
this. I think you are thinking about an older problem related to mixing
b/g (NOT mixing g/n)
No, g/n 'has issues'
(http://smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30224/100/). It's not a
simplistic drops down to
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:42 PM, mkozlows
mkozlows.49dxvb1271209...@no-mx.forums.slimdevices.com wrote:
garym;533654 Wrote:
This is incorrect. Google for lots of discussion/ explicit tests of
this. I think you are thinking about an older problem related to mixing
b/g (NOT mixing g/n)
No,
A test of reading abilities.
P
--
pski
real stereo doesn't wake neighbors (it enrages them)
.
pski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15574
View this thread:
Wigster;533558 Wrote:
On the other hand, there is a penalty associated with mixing g and n
clients on an n router: whenever it is communicating with the g client
it drops down to g for all the n clients too. If you are actually
streaming audio, this will mean that most of the time your
pfarrell;533092 Wrote:
bertdoozer wrote:
Does anyone know when squeezebox will start to support the latest
802.11N wireless standard?
I am holding off purchasing until they do.
SlimDevices and Logitech never talk about future products, dates, etc.
If anyone claims they know, they
bertdoozer;533247 Wrote:
Pat even if you are steaming your music in FLAC 24bit at 192KHz?
Correct, N still not needed.
I can stream full WAV's to three wireless SB players using a G router
without a hiccup.
I think where N might be a benefit to G devices (like SB players) is if
you have
bertdoozer wrote:
BTW: There is zero need for 11n for audio wireless.
Pat even if you are steaming your music in FLAC 24bit at 192KHz?
Yes, even if.
And of course, there is no real reason to use 192khz, since there is no
information there. Ill agree that 88.2 or 94 x 24 can be better than
Perfect answer, Pat. I feel like I can put my coffee cup down, secure
in the knowledge that I've actually learned something today. Thanks
for that.
--
gharris999
gharris999's Profile:
toby10;533258 Wrote:
Correct, N still not needed.
I can stream full WAV's to three wireless SB players using a G router
without a hiccup.
I think where N might be a benefit to G devices (like SB players) is if
you have spotty G WiFi (interference, long distance to players, etc..).
But if
dsdreamer wrote:
The ability of .11n to work reliably over long distances and use
spatial diversity to overcome interference is a very material point.
or more properly, the potential of 11n to do things like use the 5gHz
band in addition to 2.4gHz, and the ability to bond two channels for
pfarrell;533535 Wrote:
dsdreamer wrote:
The ability of .11n to work reliably over long distances and use
spatial diversity to overcome interference is a very material point.
or more properly, the potential of 11n to do things like use the 5gHz
band in addition to 2.4gHz, and the ability
On the other hand, there is a penalty associated with mixing g and n
clients on an n router: whenever it is communicating with the g client
it drops down to g for all the n clients too. If you are actually
streaming audio, this will mean that most of the time your network as a
whole is operating
Does anyone know when squeezebox will start to support the latest
802.11N wireless standard?
I am holding off purchasing until they do.
Stu
--
bertdoozer
bertdoozer's Profile:
bertdoozer wrote:
Does anyone know when squeezebox will start to support the latest
802.11N wireless standard?
I am holding off purchasing until they do.
SlimDevices and Logitech never talk about future products, dates, etc.
If anyone claims they know, they don't.
My bet is that if you are
bertdoozer;533091 Wrote:
Does anyone know when squeezebox will start to support the latest
802.11N wireless standard?
I am holding off purchasing until they do.
Stu
802.11n is a superset of 802.11g. They are the same except 11n works
on 5.8ghz and can bond several channels at once.
15 matches
Mail list logo
