[slim] Re: Audible difference? Transporter versus SB

2006-12-16 Thread tomjtx
nicoff;162861 Wrote: First post here so if I am asking for something that has been covered at length elsewhere please excuse. I have what many would consider a high-end audio system. I bought a SB recently and love the idea transferring my entire CD collection to the computer. I am using

[slim] Re: Audible difference? Transporter versus SB

2006-12-16 Thread stinkingpig
I'd ask in the Audiophiles forum. Personally, I don't hear any difference between SB3 and Transporter. -- stinkingpig That which does not kill you makes you bitter and cynical. -- Too Much Coffee Man stinkingpig's

[slim] Re: Audible difference? Transporter versus SB

2006-12-16 Thread Mark Lanctot
nicoff;162861 Wrote: I am going to assume that if I am streaming digital data to a digital preamp the SB and the Transporter should sound the same. Am I correct? There is a difference, but it's small (smaller than analog anyway) and only your equipment and ears will be able to say for sure.

[slim] Re: Audible difference? Transporter versus SB

2006-12-16 Thread ModelCitizen
In my system the difference between the Transporter and the SB3 analogue outs is very obvious and I much prefer the Transporter. However, with the Transporter you get the sound it gives, but with an SB3 you can add a DAC to suit your own taste (and add a linear PSU for more optimum output). PS.

[slim] Re: Audible difference? Transporter versus SB

2006-12-16 Thread mr_bill
ModelCitizen;162870 Wrote: In my system the difference between the Transporter and the SB3 analogue outs is very obvious and I much prefer the Transporter. However, with the Transporter you get the sound it gives, but with an SB3 you can add a DAC to suit your own taste (and add a linear PSU

[slim] Re: Audible difference? Transporter versus SB

2006-12-16 Thread Skunk
Don't forget to disable replay gain and set digital volume to fixed in Player SettingsAudio. It may be so by default, but I can't remember. -- Skunk Skunk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2685

[slim] Re: Audible difference? Transporter versus SB

2006-12-16 Thread ModelCitizen
mr_bill;162872 Wrote: If I caught your meaning MC, the Naim CDX you have sounds better than your Transporter? Thanks, Bill Yup, I think so (others probably don't!). The NAIM CDX just has more weight than anything I've tried. The sound seems to be more solid, deep, punchier and just

[slim] Re: Audible difference? Transporter versus SB

2006-12-16 Thread Skunk
ModelCitizen;162876 Wrote: And if skunk's post is referring to my comment (I'm not too sure), yes, I have everything set up for audiophile listening Apologies for ambiguity. I meant to suggest it to the OP. I'm wondering if the Inguz eq might help to recreate some of the lower end weight

[slim] Re: Audible difference? Transporter versus SB

2006-12-16 Thread adamslim
Peter;162877 Wrote: IANAA (I Am Not An Audiophile), but I understand the attraction of tubes is that they colour the sound. You won't get this colourization from the SB or the Transporter so if that's what you prefer you'll have to wait for the tube version of the Transporter. (well, if they

[slim] Re: Audible difference? Transporter versus SB

2006-12-16 Thread mkozlows
nicoff;162861 Wrote: I am transferring the digital data from the SB to a digital preamp (Lexicon MC-1) which does the digital/analog conversion. My first impression is that I sort of prefer the sound of my standalone CD player (by a tiny margin)than when using the SB. (BTW, my CD player is

Re: [slim] Re: Audible difference? Transporter versus SB

2006-12-16 Thread Peter
adamslim wrote: Peter;162877 Wrote: IANAA (I Am Not An Audiophile), but I understand the attraction of tubes is that they colour the sound. You won't get this colourization from the SB or the Transporter so if that's what you prefer you'll have to wait for the tube version of the